Seismic Performance of Coupled Shear Walls Designed according to Old and New Codes and Retrofitted with Eb-CFRP Composites

References

• American Concrete Institute (ACI). 2002. Building code requirement for reinforced concrete. ACI 318-02, Farmington Hills, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Antonopoulos, C. P., and T. C. Triantafillou. 2003. Experimental investigation of FRP-strengthened RC beam-column joints. Journal of Composites for Construction 7 (1): 39–49. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:1(39).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabzadeh, H., and K. Galal. 2017. Seismic collapse risk assessment and FRP retrofitting of RC coupled C-shaped core walls using the FEMA P695 methodology. Journal of Structural Engineering 143 (9): 04017096. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 2002. SEI/ASCE 7-02: Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, G. M. 2009. Earthquake time histories compatible with the 2005 National building code of Canada uniform hazard spectrum. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 36 (6): 991–1000. doi: 10.1139/L09-044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benazza, T. 2012. Non-linear behavior of coupled shear wall systems under seismic events. ( PhD thesis), University of Quebec, Montreal,
   Google Scholar
• Boivin, Y. (2006). Assessment of the seismic performance of a 12-storey ductile concrete shear wall system designed according to the NBCC and the CSA A 23. 3 2004 standard. ( Master thesis), Universite´ de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec,
   Google Scholar
• Boivin, Y., and P. Paultre. 2010. Seismic performance of a 12-storey ductile concrete shear wall system designed according to the 2005 National building code of Canada and the 2004 Canadian Standard Association standard A23. 3. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 37 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.1139/L09-115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Standards Association (CSA). 1984. Design of concrete structures for buildings. Standard CAN-A23.3-84, CSA, Rexdale, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Standards Association (CSA). 1994a. Design of concrete structures for buildings. Standard CAN-A23.3-94, CSA, Rexdale, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Standards Association (CSA). 1994b. Limit states design for steel buildings. Standard CAN/CSA S16.1-M94, CSA, Rexdale, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Standards Association (CSA). 2004. Design of concrete structures for buildings. Standard CAN-A23.3-04, CSA, Rexdale, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Standards Association (CSA). 2014. Design of concrete structures for buildings. Standard CAN-A23.3-14, CSA, Rexdale, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. 2004. RUAUMOKO, Computer program library. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Nueva Zelanda.
   Google Scholar
• Chaallal, O., and M.-J. Nollet. 1997. Upgrading the degree of coupling of coupled shear walls. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 24 (6): 986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, I. C. C. 2003. International Code Council. Inc., Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Computers and Structures, Inc. 2019. CSI analysis reference manual for SAP2000, ETABS, SAFE and CSiBridge, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• El-Tawil, S., K. A. Harries, P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, and Y. Kurama. 2010. Seismic design of hybrid coupled wall systems: State of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering 136 (7): 755–69. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2000a. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2000b. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Building Seismic Safety Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, B., and B. M. Shahrooz. 2001a. Steel-concrete composite coupling beams—behavior and design. Engineering Structures 23 (11): 1480–90. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00042-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, B., and B. M. Shahrooz. 2001b. Concrete-steel composite coupling beams. I: Component testing. Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (6): 625–31. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:6(625).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi, M. N., and T. M. Tran. 2016. Seismic rehabilitation of reinforced concrete beam–column joints by bonding with concrete covers and wrapping with FRP composites. Materials and Structures 49 (1–2): 467–85. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0511-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harries, K. A. 1995. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Coupled Walls Using Structural Steel. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hiotakis, S. 2004. Repair and strengthening of reinforced concrete shear walls for earthquake resistance using externally bonded carbon fibre sheets and a novel anchor system. (Master thesis), Carleton University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Honarparast, S., and O. Chaallal. 2015. Seismic upgrading of RC coupled shear walls: State of the art and research needs. Global Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Sciences 2 (12): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Imbsen Software Systems. 2004. XTRACT Cross Sectional Xs Structural Analysis of Components. v 2.6.0. Computer Program
   Google Scholar
• International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). 2003. International Building Code 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeyasawa, T., H. Shiohara, S. Otani, and H. Aoyama. 1983. Analysis of the full-scale seven-story reinforced concrete test structure. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering 37 (2): 431–78.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, A., and A. Ghobarah. 2005. Behaviour of rehabilitated structural walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 9 (3): 283–93. doi: 10.1080/13632460509350547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, L., and J. Teng. 2003. Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Construction and Building Materials 17 (6–7): 471–89. doi: 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W., R. K.-L. Su, and H.-J. Pam. 2005. Experimental study on embedded steel plate composite coupling beams. Journal of Structural Engineering 131 (8): 1294–302. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1294).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, A. 2001. Seismic assessment and retrofit of pre-1970s reinforced concrete frame structures.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, J., D. T. Lau, J. L. Humar, S. Foo, and M. S. Cheung. 2000. Seismic strengthening and repair of reinforced concrete shear walls. Paper presented at the Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zeland.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., M. J. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering 114 (8): 1804–26. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeice, D. S. 2004. Performance Based Design of a 30 Story Coupled Core Wall Structure. University of South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., P. Paultre, R. Tinawi, M. Saatcioglu, R. Tremblay, K. Elwood, J. Adams, and R. DeVall. 2010. Evolution of seismic design provisions in the national building code of Canada. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 37 (9): 1157–70. doi: 10.1139/L10-054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motter, C., J. Wallace, R. Klemencic, J. Hooper, and D. Fields (2012). Large-scale testing and analysis of concrete encased steel coupling beams under high ductility demands. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference of EarthquaNe Engineering, Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). 1941. Institute for research in construction, National research council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). 2005. Institute for research in construction, National research council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). 2010. Institute for research in construction, National research council of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
   Google Scholar
• National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). 2015. Institute for research in construction, National research council of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
   Google Scholar
• Otani, S. 1974. SAKE: A computer program for inelastic response of R/C frames to earthquakes. Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Otani, S. 1980. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete building structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 7 (2): 333–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, J., and D. Mitchell. 2003. Seismic retrofit of shear walls with headed bars and carbon fiber wrap. Journal of Structural Engineering 129 (5): 606–14. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:5(606).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana-Gallo, P. I. 2014. The nonlinear dynamics involved in the seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Saiidi, M., and M. A. Sozen. 1979. Simple and complex models for nonlinear seismic response of reinforced concrete structures. University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station. College of Engineering. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford Smith, B., and A. Coull. 1991. Tall building structures: Analysis and design. Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Su, R. K. L., and B. Cheng. 2011. Plate-strengthened deep reinforced concrete coupling beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings 164 (1): 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Su, R., and Y. Zhu. 2005. Experimental and numerical studies of external steel plate strengthened reinforced concrete coupling beams. Engineering Structures 27 (10): 1537–50. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, J., J. Chen, and Y. Lee. 1999. Concrete-filled steel tubes as coupling beams for RC shear walls. In Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS '99) Proceedings of The Second International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures 15–17 December 1999, Hong Kong, China, 391–99. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, R., G. M. Atkinson, N. Bouaanani, P. Daneshvar, P. Léger, and S. Koboevic. 2015. Selection and scaling of ground motion time histories for seismic analysis using NBCC 2015. Paper presented at the Proceeding 11th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Victoria, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• UBC. 1935. Uniform building code 1935. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), Long Beach, California.
   Google Scholar
• Xuan, G. 2006. Performance-based design of a 15-story reinforced concrete coupled core wall structure. University of Cincinnati,
   Google Scholar