Seismic Fragility Assessment of Non-ductile Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Australia

References

• Altheeb, A. H. (2016) “Seismic drift capacity of lightly reinforced concrete shear walls,” PhD Thesis, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE/SEI). 2006. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-06). Reston, Virginia: Americal Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE/SEI). 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Amirsardari, A. (2018) “Seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Australia including the response of gravity frames,” PhD Thesis, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Amirsardari, A., H. M. Goldsworthy, and E. Lumantarna. 2017. Seismic site response analysis leading to revised design response spectra for Australia. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (6): 861–90. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1210058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirsardari, A., P. Rajeev, E. Lumantarna, and H. M. Goldsworthy. 2019. Suitable intensity measure for probabilistic seismic risk assessment of non-ductile Australian reinforced concrete buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi: 10.1007/s10518-019-00632-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirsardari, A., P. Rajeev, H. M. Goldsworthy, and E. Lumantarna (2016) “Modelling non-ductile reinforced concrete columns,” Paper presented at the Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2016 Conference, Melbourne, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council. 2009. FEMA P695: Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council. Seismic performance assessment of buildings (FEMA P-58). Volume 1: Methodology. Washington, D.C, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Aslani, H., and E. Miranda. 2005. Probability-based seismic response analysis. Engineering Structures 27 (8): 1151–63. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, S. K., and J. L. Beck. 2003. Subset simulation and its application to seismic risk based on dynamic analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 129 (8): 901–17. doi: 10.1061//ASCE/0733-9399/2003/129:8/901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W., and C. A. Cornell (2006) “Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis” PEER Report 2006/08: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, K., A. Dazio, and M. J. N. Priestley. 2008. Inelastic wide-column models for U-shaped reinforced concrete walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12 (sup1): 1–33. doi: 10.1080/13632460801922571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, K., S. Simonini, R. Constantin, and A. Rutenberg. 2014. Seismic shear distribution among interconnected cantilever walls of different lengths. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43 (10): 1423–41. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., and G. Gibson. 2004. A multi-tiered earthquake hazard model for Australia. Tectonophysics 390 (1–4): 25–43. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2008. Modeling beam-column joints in fragility assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12 (3): 357–81. doi: 10.1080/13632460701457215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2009. Seismic risk assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames subjected to mid-America ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering 135 (4): 414–24. doi: 10.1061//ASCE/0733-9445/2009/135:4/414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2010. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames – Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Structural Safety 32 (1): 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concrete Institute of Australia. 2007. Recommended practice: Reinforcement detailing handbook for reinforced and prestressed concrete. Based upon the Australian Concrete Structures Standard - AS 3600:2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D., R. Fenwick, and A. Russell (2014) “Amendment 3 to NZS3101,” Paper presented at the The New Zealand Concrete Industry Conference, Taupo, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (8): 526–33. doi: 10.1061//ASCE/0733-9445/2002/128:4/526.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, K. J. 2004. Modelling failures in existing reinforced concrete columns. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 31 (5): 846–59. doi: 10.1139/l04-040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, K. J., and J. P. Moehle (2003) “Shake table tests and analytical studies on the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER Report 2003/01. University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, K. J., and J. P. Moehle. 2005. Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement. Earthquake Spectra 21 (1): 71–89. doi: 10.1193/1.1849774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-356. Washington, D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2010. HAZUS-MH MR5 technical manual - earthquake model. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. J., M. G. Stewart, M. Loo, M. Ahammed, and V. Sirivivatnanon. 2016. Calibration of Australian standard AS3600 concrete structures: Part I statistical analysis of material properties and model error. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 17 (4): 242–53. doi: 10.1080/13287982.2016.1246793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghannoum, W. M., and J. P. Moehle. 2012a. Dynamic collapse analysis of a concrete frame sustaining column axial failures. ACI Structural Journal 109 (3): 403–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghannoum, W. M., and J. P. Moehle. 2012b. Rotation-based shear failure model for lightly confined RC columns. Journal of Structural Engineering 138 (10): 1267–78. doi: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovenale, P., C. A. Cornell, and L. Esteva. 2004. Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 33 (8): 951–79. doi: 10.1002/eqe.386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsworthy, H. M., and G. Gibson (2012) “Changes in seismic design philosophy for RC structures in areas of low to moderate seismicity following the Christchurch earthquake,” Paper presented at the 15th World Coference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, C. B., A. B. Liel, S. C. Taylor-Lange, and G. G. Deierlein. 2016. Calibration of model to simulate response of reinforced concrete beam-columns to collapse. ACI Structural Journal 113: 6. doi: 10.14359/51689245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y. M. A., M. I. Musgrove, J. A. Harmon, D. R. Groholski, C. A. Phillips, and D. Park (2016) DEEPSOIL 6.1.  Accessed December 1, 2016. http://deepsoil.cee.illinois.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, W. M. (2011) “Analytical and experimental assessment of seismic vulnerability of beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement in concrete buildings,” PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R. S. (2013) “Assessment of the minimum vertical reinforcement limits for RC walls,” Paper presented at the New Zealand Society Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Hoult, R., H. Goldsworthy, and E. Lumantarna. 2017. Plastic hinge length for lightly reinforced rectangular concrete walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1286619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoult, R., H. Goldsworthy, and E. Lumantarna. 2018. Plastic hinge length for lightly reinforced C-shaped concrete walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1453419.
   Google Scholar
• Hoult, R. D. (2017) “Seismic assessment of reinforced concrete walls in Australia,” PhD Thesis, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F., H. Ebrahimian, A. Miano, G. Manfredi, and H. Sezen. 2017. Analytical fragility assessment using unscaled ground motion records. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F., P. Franchin, and P. E. Pinto. 2007. A scalar damage measure for seismic reliability analysis of RC frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (13): 2059–79. doi: 10.1002/eqe.704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F., R. De Risi, and G. Manfredi. 2014. Bayesian cloud analysis: Efficient structural fragility assessment using linear regression. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (4): 1183–203. doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9692-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, J.-S., L. N. Lowes, R. DesRoches, and I. Brilakis. 2015. Fragility curves for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames that exhibit different component response mechanisms. Engineering Structures 85: 127–43. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, W. Y., S. Pampanin, and K. Elwood. 2011. Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 february christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 44 (4): 239–78. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.239-278.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, O.-S., and A. Elnashai. 2006. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Engineering Structures 28 (2): 289–303. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, N. T. K. 1999. ““GENQKE” User’s Guide: Program for generating synthetic earthquake accelerograms based on stochastic simulations of seismological models. Australia: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• LeBorgne, M. R., and W. M. Ghannoum. 2014a. Analytical element for simulating lateral-strength degradation in reinforced concrete columns and other frame members. Journal of Structural Engineering 140 (7): 04014038. doi: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBorgne, M. R., and W. M. Ghannoum. 2014b. Calibrated analytical element for lateral-strength degradation of reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures 81: 35–48. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberty OneSteel. (n.d.). History of Australian reinforcing bar standards. 2017. Accessed February 1, 2017. https://www.libertyonesteel.com/resources/content/rebar-standards-history/
   Google Scholar
• Liel, A. B., C. B. Haselton, and G. G. Deierlein. 2011. Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. II: Comparative assessment of nonductile and ductile moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 137 (4): 492–502. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowes, L. N., and A. Altoontash. 2003. Modelling reinforced-concrete beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 129 (12): 1686–97. doi: 10.1061//ASCE/0733-9445/2003/129:12/1686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., R. S. Henry, R. Gultom, and Q. T. Ma. 2016. Cyclic testing of reinforced concrete walls with distributed minimum vertical reinforcement. Journal of Structural Engineering 1–17. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001723.
   Google Scholar
• Maqsood, T., M. Wehner, H. Ryu, M. Edwards, K. Dale, and V. Miller (2014) “GAR15 regional vulnerability functions: Reporting on the UNISDR/GA SE Asian regional workshop On structural vulnerability models for the GAR global risk assessment, 11–14 november, 2013, geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia.” Record 2014/38. Canberra, ACT: Geoscience Australia.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., Scott, M. N. and Jeremic, B. (2000) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES),” (Version 2.4.5, 2013): Pacific earthquake engineering research center, university of california, Berkeley, CA. Accessed December 1, 2016. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Norton, J. A., A. B. King, D. K. Bull, H. E. Chapman, G. H. McVerry, T. J. Larkin, and K. C. Spring. 1994. Northridge earthquake reconnaissance report. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 27 (4): 235–342. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.27.4.235-344.
   Google Scholar
• Pantelides, C. P., J. Hansen, H. Nadauld, and L. D. Reaveley (2002) “Assessment of reinforce concrete building exterior joints with substandard details” PEER 2002/18: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., and K. M. Mosalam. 2013. Simulation of reinforced concrete frames with nonductile beam-column joints. Earthquake Spectra 29 (1): 233–57. doi: 10.1193/1.4000100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessiki, S. P., C. H. Conley, P. Gergely, and R. N. White (1990) “Seismic behavior of lightly-reinforced concrete column and beam-column joint details” Technical Report NCEER-90-0014: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Petrini, L., C. Maggi, M. J. N. Priestley, and G. M. Calvi. 2008. Experimental verification of viscous damping modeling for inelastic time history analyzes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12 (sup1): 125–45. doi: 10.1080/13632460801925822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, K. 2016. A beginner’s guide to fragility, vulnerability, and risk, 92. Denver CO, USA: University of Colorado Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., G. M. Calvi, and M. J. Kowalsky. 2007. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, J. S., L. N. Lowes, and D. E. Lehman. 2015. Nonlinear line-element modeling of flexural reinforced concrete walls. Engineering Structures 104: 174–92. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeev, P., P. Franchin, and P. E. Pinto. 2008. Increased accuracy of vector-IM-based seismic risk assessment? Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12 (sup1): 111–24. doi: 10.1080/13632460801925798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeev, P., P. Franchin, and S. Tesfamariam (2014) “Probabilistic seismic demand model for RC frame buildings using cloud analysis and incremental dynamic analysis,” Paper presented at the Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (NCEE). Anchorage, Alaska.
   Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy, S. K., P. Gardoni, and J. M. Bracci. 2006. Probabilistic demand models and fragility curves for reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Structural Engineering 132 (10): 1563–72. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:10(1563).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy, S. K., P. Gardoni, and J. M. Bracci. 2008. Seismic fragility and confidence bounds for gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames of varying height. Journal of Structural Engineering 134 (4): 639–50. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., G. Fulford, and T. Dbu (2005) “EQRM: geoscience Australia’s earthquake risk model, technical manual version 3.0” Record 2005/01. Canberra, ACT: Geoscience Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. H., and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements. Journal of Structural Engineering 132 (2): 244–52. doi: 10.1061//ASCE/0733-9445/2006/132:2/244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezen, H. (2002) “Seismic behavior and modeling of reinforced concrete columns,” PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Sezen, H., and J. P. Moehle. 2004. Shear strength model for lightly reinforced concrete columns. Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (11): 1692–703. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1692).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shome, N., and C. A. Cornell (2000) “Structural seismic demand analysis: Consideration of collapse,” Paper presented at the 8th ASCE Speciality Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. 1983. Minimum design loads on structures - Wind loads. Sydney, NSW: Standards Association of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. 1988. AS 3600-1988: Concrete structures. Sydney, NSW: Standards Association of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. 1991. AS 1302: 1991Steel reinforcing bars for concrete. Sydney, NSW: Standards Association of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. 2007. AS 1170.4-2007: Structural design actions, Part 4: Earthquake actions in Australia. Sydney, NSW: SAI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. 2009. AS 3600-2009: Concrete structures. Sydney, NSW: SAI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand. 2002. AS/NZS 1170.0-2002: Structural design actions, part 0: General principles. Syndey, NSW, and Wellington: SAI Global and Standards New Zealand.
   Google Scholar