205
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Quantifying the Likelihood of Exceeding a Limit State via the Displacement-based Assessment Approach

& ORCID Icon
Pages 4346-4364 | Received 01 Jul 2020, Accepted 20 Sep 2020, Published online: 07 Mar 2021

References

  • Aschheim, M., and E. F. Black. 2000. Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation. Earthquake Spectra 16 (2): 317–35.
  • Bakalis, K., and D. Vamvatsikos. 2018. Seismic fragility functions via nonlinear response history analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering 144 (10): 04018181.
  • Baker, J. W. 2007. “Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures.”. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (36): 1861–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.700.
  • Baker, J. W. 2015. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–99.
  • Bozorgnia, Y., M. M. Hachem, and K. W. Campbell. 2010. Ground motion prediction Eq. (attenuation relationship) for inelastic response spectra. Earthquake Spectra 26 (1): 1–23.
  • Bradley, B. A. 2010. A Generalized Conditional Intensity Measure Approach and Holistic Ground Motion Selection. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39 (12): 1324–1342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.995
  • Bradley, B. A. 2013. A New Zealand‐specific pseudospectral acceleration ground‐motion prediction Eq. for active shallow crustal earthquakes based on foreign models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103 (3): 1801–22.
  • Bradley, B. A., R. P. Dhakal, M. Cubrinovski, J. B. Mander, and G. A. MacRae. 2007. Improved seismic hazard model with application to probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (14): 2211–25.
  • Calvi, G. M. 1999. A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 3 (3): 411–38.
  • Carr, A. 2000. RUAUMOKO, Software for inelastic dynamic analysis. New Zealand: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury.
  • Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (4): 526–33.
  • Eads, L., E. Miranda, and D. Lignos. 2016. Spectral shape metrics and structural collapse potential. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45 (10): 1643–59.
  • Ebrahimian, H., F. Jalayer, A. Lucchini, F. Mollaioli, and G. Manfredi. 2015. Preliminary ranking of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13: 2805–40.
  • Faggella, M., A. R. Barbosa, J. P. Conte, E. Spacone, and J. I. Restrepo. 2013. Probabilistic seismic response analysis of a 3-D reinforced concrete building. Structural Safety 44: 11–27.
  • Fajfar, P., P. Gašperšič, and D. Drobnič. 1997. A simplified nonlinear method for seismic damage analysis of structures. In Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, ed. P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, 183–94. Rotterdam: Balkema.
  • Gulkan, P., and M. A. Sozen. 1974. Inelastic responses of reinforced concrete structure to earthquake motions. ACI Journal 71 (12): 604–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.14359/17694.
  • Jalayer, F., and C. Cornell. 2009. Alternative non‐linear demand estimation methods for probability‐based seismic assessments. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 38 (8): 951–72.
  • Jalayer, F., and C. A. Cornell (2003). A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor (DCFD) seismic formats. PEER Report 2003/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, College of Engineering, University of California Berkeley.
  • Luco, N., and C. A. Cornell. 2000. Effects of connection fractures on SMRF seismic drift demands. Journal of Structural Engineering 126 (1): 127–36.
  • Mazza, F., and R. Labernarda. 2017. Structural and non-structural intensity measures for the assessment of base-isolated structures subjected to pulse-like near-fault earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 96: 115–27.
  • NZSEE. (2017). The seismic assessment of existing buildings: technical guidelines for engineering assessments. Part C-Detailed Seismic Assessment. Part C8-Unreinforced Masonry Buildings.
  • Pennucci, D., T. J. Sullivan, and G. M. Calvi. 2011. Displacement reduction factors for the design of medium and long period structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15 (Supplement 1): 1–29.
  • Priestley, M. 1997. Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1 (1): 157–92.
  • Priestley, M. N., G. M. Calvi, and M. J. Kowalsky. 2007. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS press.
  • Shibata, A., and M. A. Sozen. 1976. Substitute-structure method for seismic design in R/C. Journal of the Structural Division 102: 1–18. (ASCE# 11824).
  • Stafford, P. J., T. J. Sullivan, and D. Pennucci. 2016. Empirical correlation between inelastic and elastic spectral displacement demands. Earthquake Spectra 32 (3): 1419–48.
  • Sullivan, T. J., D. P. Welch, and G. M. Calvi. 2014. Simplified seismic performance assessment and implications for seismic design. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 13 (1): 95–122.
  • Sullivan, T. J., D. Saborio-Romano, G. J. O’Reilly, D. P. Welch, and L. Landi. 2018. “Simplified Pushover Analysis of Moment Resisting Frame Structures”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Taylor & Francis. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1528911
  • Tothong, P., and C. A. Cornell. 2006. An empirical ground-motion attenuation relation for inelastic spectral displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96 (6): 2146–64.
  • Vamvatsikos, D. 2012. Accurate application and second-order improvement of SAC/FEMA probabilistic formats for seismic performance assessment. Journal of Structural Engineering 140 (2): 04013058.
  • Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31 (3): 491–514.
  • Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2005. Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multidegree-of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation. Journal of Structural Engineering 131 (4): 589–99.
  • Venture, S. J. (2000). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings, FEMA 350. Federal Emergency Management Agency, USA, 13.
  • Welch, D., T. Sullivan, and G. Calvi. 2014. Developing direct displacement-based procedures for simplified loss assessment in performance-based earthquake engineering. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18 (2): 290–322.
  • Yeow, T., A. Orumiyehei, T. Sullivan, G. MacRae, G. Clifton, and K. Elwood. 2018. Seismic performance of steel friction connections considering direct-repair costs. Bull Earthquake Eng 16: 5963–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0421-x.
  • Zareian, F., L. Ibarra, and H. Krawinkler (2004). Seismic demands and capacities of single-story and low-rise multi-story woodframe structures. Paper presented at the Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada,

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.