Seismic Performance of a New Capacity Design Scheme for RC Framed Building

References

• ACI 318. 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Allam, S. M., H. M. Elbakry, and I. S. Arab. 2018. Exterior reinforced concrete beam column joint subjected to monotonic loading. Alexandria Engineering Journal 57 (4): 4133–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATC 58. 2012. Guidelines for Seismic performance assessment of buildings. Redwood City, CA, USA: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bal, I. E., H. Crowley, and R. Pinho. 2008. Detail assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC buildings stock for loss assessment models. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering 28: 914–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhosale, A. S., R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2017. Vertical irregularity of buildings: Regularity index versus seismic risk. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 3 (3): 04017001.
   Google Scholar
• Celarec, D., P. Ricci, and M. Dolšek. 2012. The sensitivity of seismic response parameters to the uncertain modelling variables of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames. Engineering Structure 35: 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2010. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames–Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Structural Safety 32 (1): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (4): 526–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R., D. Menon, and M. Prasad. 2010. Earthquake-resistant design of open ground storey RC framed buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering(Chennai) 37 (2): 117–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dhir, P. K., R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2018. Safety assessment of gravity load–designed reinforced concrete–framed buildings. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 4 (2): 04018004.
   Google Scholar
• ElSayed, M., M. Campidelli, W. El-Dakhakhni, and M. Tait. 2015. Simplified framework for blast-risk-based cost-benefit analysis for reinforced concrete-block buildings. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 30 (4): 04015077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 1998. 2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA P695. 2012. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Redwood City: California: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. J., T. J. Sullivan, and K. Beyer. 2014. Capacity design of coupled RC walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18 (5): 735–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, D., Z. Zhou, X. Zhou, and K. Hai Tan. 2018. Seismic behavior tests of square reinforced concrete–filled steel tube columns connected to RC beam joints. Journal of Structural Engineering 145 (3): 04018267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haran, P. D. C., A. Bhosale, R. P. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2016. Multiplication factor for open ground storey buildings – A reliability based evaluation. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 15 (2): 283–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H. P., E. N. Allouche, and M. Trivedi. 2006. Optimal scheduling of replacement and rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 12 (3): 184–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IS 13920. 2016. Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces–code of practice. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, R. N., R. K. Chadha, K. B. Rao, and S. T. G. Raghukanth. 2010. Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India.” Final Rep. New Delhi, India: National Disaster Management Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Li, B., and C. L. Leong. 2014. Experimental and numerical investigations of the seismic behavior of high-strength concrete beam-column joints with column axial load. Journal of Structural Engineering 141 (9): 04014220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M., R. Beckman, and W. Conover. 2000. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 42 (1): 55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, F., and G. L. Fenves. 2018. Open system for earthquake simulation framework (OpenSees). ver 8.6.9, University of California. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).
   Google Scholar
• Mistri, A., P. Sarkar, and R. Davis. 2019. Column–beam moment capacity ratio and seismic risk of reinforced concrete frame building. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings 172 (3): 189–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitropoulou, C. C., N. D. Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis. 2011. Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96 (10): 1311–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, B., F. Zhao, Q. Qiao, L. Wang, H. Li, B. He, and Z. Hao. 2019. Flexural behavior of beam to column joints with or without an overlying concrete slab. Engineering Structures 199: 109616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S., and V. K. Gupta. 2002. Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time-histories. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22 (9–12): 799–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murty, C. V., R. Goswani, A. Vijayanarayanan, and V. V. Mehta. 2012. Some concepts in earthquake behaviour of buildings. Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority, Gujarat.
   Google Scholar
• Nahar, M., A. M. Billah, H. R. Kamal, and K. Islam. 2019. Numerical seismic performance evaluation of concrete beam-column joint reinforced with different super elastic shape memory alloy rebars. Engineering Structures 194: 161–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NZS 3101. 2006. Concrete structures standard part 1, the design of concrete structures. Wellington: New Zealand Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, P. 2018. Reliability based seismic behaviour of beam-column joints in multi-storeyed RC framed structure. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, West Bengal.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeev, P., and S. Tesfamariam. 2012. Seismic fragilities for reinforced concrete buildings with consideration of irregularities. Structural Safety 39 (Nov): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sasmal, S., and S. Voggu. 2019. Performance evaluation of differently designed beam-column joints under cyclic shear-torsion loading. Engineering Structures 197: 109447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, J., L. D. Osorio, J. I. Craig, and B. J. Goodno. 2012. Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events. Engineering Structures 45: 585–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shome, N. (1999). “Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures.” Rep. No. RMS-35, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sunayana, S. (2014). “Moment capacity ratio at beam – Column joint in a regular RC framed building.” MTech Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha.
   Google Scholar
• Uma, S. R., and S. K. Jain. 2006. Seismic design of beam-column joints in RC moment resisting frames – Review of codes. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 23(5), 579–597.
   Google Scholar
• Val, D. V., and R. E. Melchers. 1997. Reliability of deteriorating RC slab bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 123 (12): 1638–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D. 2013. Derivation of new SAC/FEMA performance evaluation solutions with second‐order hazard approximation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (8): 1171–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31 (3): 491–514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar