Seismic Response of Two Freestanding Statue-Pedestal Systems during the 2014 South Napa Earthquake

References

• Acikgoz, S., and M. J. Dejong. 2013. The rocking response of large flexible structures to earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (2): 875–908. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9538-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Abadi, H., V. Paton-Cole, E. Gad, N. Lam, and V. Patel. 2019. Rocking behavior of irregular free-standing objects subjected to earthquake motion. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 23 (5): 79–809. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1342305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhan, C., and M. Sürmeli. 2015. Necessity and adequacy of near-source factors for not-so-tall fixed-base buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 14 (1): 13–26. doi: 10.1007/s11803-015-0003-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R. H., I. J. Oppenheim, A. R. Parker, and J. Bielak. 1986. On the dynamic response of rigid body assemblies. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 14 (6): 861–76. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290140604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambraseys, N., and I. N. Psycharis. 2011. Earthquake stability of columns and statues. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15 (5): 685–710. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2010.541549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris, P. G., V. Sarhosis, A. Mohebkhah, V. Plevris, L. Papaloizou, P. Komodromos, and J. V. Lemos. 2015. Numerical modeling of historic masonry structures. In Handbook of research on seismic assessment and rehabilitation of historic structures, ed. P. G. Asteris and V. Plevris, 213–56. Hershey PA, USA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Baros, D. K., and A. Papalou. 2019. Parametric analysis of the dynamic response of multi-drum columns. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1657986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berto, L., T. Favaretto, and A. Saetta. 2013. Seismic risk mitigation technique for art objects: Experimental evaluation and numerical modelling of double concave curved surface sliders. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11 (5): 1817–40. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9441-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berto, L., T. Favaretto, A. Saetta, F. Antonelli, and L. Lazzarini. 2012. Assessment of seismic vulnerability of art objects: The ‘Galleria dei Prigioni’ sculptures at the accademia gallery in Florence. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13 (1): 7–21. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2011.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyzaei, C., J. Bray, J. Cohen-Waeber, T. Dawson, L. Harder, K. Hudnut, K. Kelson, T. Kishida, R. Lanzafame, R. Luque, et al. 2014. Geotechnical engineering reconnaissance of the August 24, 2014 M6 South Napa Earthquake [Version 1]. Report No. GEER-037, Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) Association. doi: 10.13140/2.1.1094.7844.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, B. A. 2004. Engineering seismology. In Earthquake engineering from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, ed. Y. Bozorgnia and V. V. Bertero, 2-1–2-35. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, B. A., and N. A. Abrahamson. 2003. Estimation of strong seismic ground motions. In International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology part B, ed. W. H. K. Lee, H. Kanamori, P. C. Jennings, and C. Kisslinger, 983–1001. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Borri, A., and A. Grazini. 2006. Diagnostic analysis of the lesions and stability of Michelangelo’s David. Journal of Cultural Heritage 7 (4): 273–85. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2006.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, J. D., and A. Rodriguez-Marek. 2004. Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24 (11): 815–28. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocher, T. M., A. S. Baltay, J. L. Hardebeck, F. F. Pollitz, J. R. Murray, A. L. Llenos, D. P. Schwartz, J. L. Blair, D. J. Ponti, J. J. Lienkaemper, et al. 2015. The Mw 6.0 24 August 2014 South Napa Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 86 (2A): 309–26. doi: 10.1785/0220150004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD). 2014. South Napa earthquake of 24 Aug 2014. CESMD. Accessed February 07, 2018. https://strongmotioncenter.org.
   Google Scholar
• Cignoni, P., M. Callieri, M. Corsini, M. Dellepiane, F. Ganovelli, and G. Ranzuglia. 2008. MeshLab: An open-source mesh processing tool. In Proc. of the Sixth Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, Salerno, Italy, 129–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cundall, P. A. 1971. A computer model for simulating progressive, large-scale movements in blocky rock systems. In Proc. of the International Symposium on Rock Mechanics, vol. 2, No. 8. Nancy, France.
   Google Scholar
• Cundall, P. A. 1988. Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model – Part I: A scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 25: 107–16. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(88)92293-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundall, P. A., and O. D. L. Strack. 1979. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29 (1): 47–65. doi: 10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Altri, A. M., G. Milani, S. de Miranda, G. Castellazzi, and V. Sarhosis. 2019. On the stability analysis of a geometrically complex leaning historic structure. In Structural analysis of historical constructions, ed. R. Aguilar, D. Torrealva, S. Moreira, M. A. Pando, and L. F. Ramos, 975–82. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dicleli, M., and S. Buddaram. 2007. Equivalent linear analysis of seismic-isolated bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions with forward rupture directivity effect. Engineering Structures 29 (2): 21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.004.
   Google Scholar
• Ducke, B., D. Score, and J. Reeves. 2011. Multiview 3D reconstruction of the archaeological site at Weymouth from image series. Computers & Graphics 35 (2): 375–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2011.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI). 2014. M 6.0 South Napa Earthquake of August 24, 2014. EERI Special Earthquake Report – October 2014, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Erdik, M., and E. Durukal. 2001. A hybrid procedure for the assessment of design basis earthquake ground motions for near-fault conditions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 21 (5): 431–43. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00025-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, R. D., P. A. Cundall, and J. V. Lemos. 1988. Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model – Part II: Mechanical calculations. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 25: 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, W.-L., and A. K. Agrawal. 2008. Analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design and assessment of seismic protective systems. Journal of Structural Engineering 134 (7): 1177–88. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1177).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housner, G. W. 1963. The behaviour of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 53 (2): 403–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, Y. 1982. Motions of rigid bodies and criteria for overturning by earthquake excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 10 (5): 635–50. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290100502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. 2016. 3DEC — three-dimensional distinct element code, Ver. 5.2. Minneapolis: Itasca.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. A., and S. A. Mahin. 2016. The Mw 6.0 South Napa Earthquake of August 24, 2014: A wake-up call for renewed investment in seismic resilience across California. PEER Report No. 2016/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. J. 2013. Bach to Bacchus. Ceja Vineyards. Accessed November 6, 2019. http://bachtobacchus.blogspot.com/2013/07/ceja-vineyards.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kazhdan, M., M. Bolitho, and H. Hoppe. 2006 “Poisson surface reconstruction. In Proc. of the 4th Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, 61–70. Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantinidis, D., and N. Makris. 2005. Seismic response analysis of multidrum classical columns. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34: 1243–70. doi: 10.1002/eqe.478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounadis, A., G. Papadopoulos, and D. Cotsovos. 2012. Overturning instability of a two-rigid block system under ground excitation. ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Mathematik Und Mechanik 92 (7): 536–57. doi: 10.1002/zamm.201100095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, J. V. 2007. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1 (2): 190–213. doi: 10.1080/15583050601176868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, J. V. 2008. Block modelling of rock masses. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 12 (7–8): 915–49. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2008.9693054.
   Google Scholar
• Makris, N. 2014. A half-century of rocking isolation. Earthquakes and Structures 7 (6): 1187–221. doi: 10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makris, N., and Y. Roussos. 2000. Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions. Geotechnique 50 (3): 243–62. doi: 10.1680/geot.2000.50.3.243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papantonopoulos, C., I. N. Psycharis, D. Y. Papastamatiou, J. V. Lemos, and H. P. Mouzakis. 2002. Numerical prediction of the earthquake response of classical columns using the distinct element method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31 (9): 1699–717. doi: 10.1002/eqe.185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, F., F. Prieto, P. B. Lourenço, A. C. Costa, and J. V. Lemos. 2007. On the dynamics of rocking motion of single rigid-block structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36 (15): 2383–99. doi: 10.1002/eqe.739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitilakis, K., G. Tsinidis, and S. Karafagka. 2017. Analysis of the seismic behavior of classical multi-drum and monolithic columns. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (12): 5281–307. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0160-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psycharis, I. N. 1990. Dynamic behaviour of rocking two-block assemblies. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 19 (4): 555–75. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290190407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psycharis, I. N., M. Fragiadakis, and I. Stefanou. 2013. Seismic reliability assessment of classical columns subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 42: 2061–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psycharis, I. N., and P. C. Jennings. 1983. Rocking of slender rigid bodies allowed to uplift. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 11 (1): 57–76. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290110106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psycharis, I. N., J. V. Lemos, D. Y. Papastamatiou, C. Zambas, and C. Papantonopoulos. 2003. Numerical study of the seismic behaviour of a part of the Parthenon Pronaos. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 32 (13): 2063–84. doi: 10.1002/eqe.315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psycharis, I. N., D. Y. Papastamatiou, and A. P. Alexandris. 2000. Parametric investigation of the stability of classical columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 29 (8): 1093–109. doi: 10.1002/1096-9845(200008)29:8<1093::AID-EQE953>3.0.CO;2-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvance, M. D. (2005) “Overturning of slender blocks: Numerical investigation and application to precariously balanced rocks in southern California,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno.
   Google Scholar
• Purvance, M. D., A. Anooshehpoor, and J. N. Brune. 2008. Freestanding block overturning fragilities: Numerical simulation and experimental validation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 37 (5): 791–808. doi: 10.1002/eqe.789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhosis, V., P. Asteris, T. Wang, W. Hu, and Y. Han. 2016. On the stability of colonnade structural systems under static and dynamic loading conditions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14 (4): 1131–52. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9881-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhosis, V., D. Baraldi, J. Lemos, and G. Milani. 2019. Dynamic behaviour of ancient freestanding multi-drum and monolithic columns subjected to horizontal and vertical excitations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 120: 39–57. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenton, H. W., and N. P. Jones. 1991. Base excitation of rigid bodies. I: Formulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 117 (10): 2286–306. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:10(2286).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinopoli, A. 1989. Dynamic evolution by earthquake excitation of multiblock structures. In Proc. of the International Conference on Structural Conservation of Stone Masonry: Diagnosis, Repair and Strengthening, 115–22. Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, P. G. 1998. Development of an improved representation of near fault ground motions. In Proc. of the SMIP98 Seminar on Utilization of Strong Ground Motion Data, 1–20. Sacramento, California.
   Google Scholar
• Sorace, S., and G. Terenzi. 2015. Seismic performance assessment and base-isolated floor protection of statues exhibited in museum halls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (6): 1873–92. doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9680-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorace, S., G. Terenzi, C. Bitossi, and E. Mori. 2016. Mutual seismic assessment and isolation of different art objects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 85: 91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanou, I., I. Psycharis, and I.-O. Georgopoulos. 2011. Dynamic response of reinforced masonry columns in classical monuments. Construction and Building Materials 25 (12): 4325–37. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theoharis, A. P., and G. Deodatis. 1994. Seismic ground motion in a layered half-space due to a Haskell-type source. I: Theory. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 13 (4): 281–92. doi: 10.1016/0267-7261(94)90032-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2014. M6.0 South Napa, California Earthquake – August 24, 2014. Accessed November 6, 2019. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/events/2014napa/
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, T., K. Meguro, and F. Yamazaki. 1995. Response of rigid body assemblies to dynamic excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24 (10): 1389–408. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290241008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittich, C. E., and T. C. Hutchinson. 2015. Shake table tests of stiff, unattached, asymmetric structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 44 (14): 2425–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittich, C. E., and T. C. Hutchinson. 2017. Shake table tests of unattached, asymmetric, dual-body systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 46 (9): 1391–410. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittich, C. E., T. C. Hutchinson, E. Lo, D. Meyer, and F. Kuester. 2014. “The South Napa Earthquake of August 24, 2014: Drone-based aerial and ground-based LiDAR imaging survey. Structure Systems Research Project Report Series Report No. SSRP 14/09, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
   Google Scholar
• Wittich, C. E., T. C. Hutchinson, R. L. Wood, M. Seracini, and F. Kuester. 2016. Characterization of full-scale, human-form, culturally important statues: Case study. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 30 (3): 05015001. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim, C.-S., A. K. Chopra, and J. Penzien. 1980. Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 8 (6): 565–87. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290080606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar