Seismic Vulnerability of Vernacular Residential Buildings in Bhutan

References

• Bayulke, N. 1978. Behavior of brick masonry buildings during earthquakes. In Seminar on Constructions in Seismic Zones. Rome: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Berthet, T., J-F. Ritz, M. Ferry, P. Pelgay, R. Cattin, D. Drukpa, R. Braucher, and G. Hetenyi. 2014. Active tectonics of the eastern Himalaya: New constraints from the first tectonic geomorphology study in southern Bhutan. Geology 42 (5): 427–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessason, B., and J. Ö. Bjarnason. 2016. Seismic vulnerability of low-rise residential buildings based on damage data from three earthquakes (Mw6.5, 6.5 and 6.3). Engineering Structures 111 (June2000): 64–79. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.008.
   Google Scholar
• Bessason, B., J. Ö. Bjarnason, and R. Rupakhety. 2020. Statistical modelling of seismic vulnerability of RC, timber and masonry buildings from complete empirical loss data. Engineering Structures 209: 109969. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilham, R., and P. England. 2001. Plateau 'pop-up' in the great 1897 Assam earthquake 410(6830): 806–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standard. 2002. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part I: General provisions and buildings. New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Chaulagain, H., D. Gautam, and H. Rodrigues. 2018. Revisiting major historical earthquakes in Nepal: Overview of 1833, 1934, 1980, 1988, 2011, and 2015 seismic events. In Impacts and Insights of Gorkha earthquake, ed. H. Gautam and R. Dipendra, Vol. I., 1–17. Boston, MA: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812808-4.00001-8.
   Google Scholar
• Chettri, N., D. Gautam, and R. Rupakhety. in press. From tship chim to pa chim: Seismic vulnerability and strengthening of bhutanese vernacular buildings. In Masonry construction in active seismic Regions, ed. R. Rupakhety and D. Gautam, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, T., J. Singer, G. Hetenyi, D. Grujic, J. Clinton, D. Giardini, E. Kissling, and GANSSER Working Group. 2017. Seismotectonics of Bhutan: Evidence for segmentation of the Eastern Himalayas and link to foreland deformation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 471: 54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Drukpa, D., A. A. Velasco, and D. I. Doser. 2006. Seismicity in the Kingdom of Bhutan (1937–2003): Evidence for crustal transcurrent deformation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 111 (B6): B06301.
   Google Scholar
• EERI. 2012. Learning from earthquakes: The Mw 6.9 Sikkim-Nepal border earthquake of September 18, 2011. California. https://www.eeri.org/wp-content/uploads/Sikkim-EQ-report-FINAL_03-08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elnashai, A. S., B. Borzi, and S. Vlachos. 2004. Deformation-based vulnerability functions for RC bridges. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 17: 215–44. doi: 10.12989/sem.2004.17.2.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnashai, A. S., and L. Di Sarno. 2008. Fundamentals of earthquake engineering. doi: 10.1002/9780470024867.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, D. 2017. Seismic performance of world heritage Sites in Kathmandu valley during Gorkha seismic sequence of April–May 2015. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 31 (5): 06017003. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, D. 2018. Observational fragility functions for residential stone masonry buildings in Nepal. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16: 4661–73. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0372-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., G. Fabbrocino, and F. Santucci de Magistris. 2018. Derive empirical fragility functions for Nepali residential buildings. Engineering Structures 171: 617–28. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., G. Forte, and H. Rodrigues. 2016. Site effects and associated structural damage analysis in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Earthquake and Structures 10 (5): 1013–32. doi: 10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., and H. Chaulagain. 2016. Structural performance and associated lessons to be learned from world earthquakes in Nepal after 25 April 2015 (MW 7.8) Gorkha earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 68. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., and H. Rodrigues. 2018. Seismic vulnerability of urban vernacular buildings in Nepal: Case of Newari Construction. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–22. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1498411.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., R. Adhikari, R. Rupakhety, and P. Koirala. 2020. An empirical method for seismic vulnerability assessment of Nepali school buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18: 5965–82. doi: 10.1007/s10518-020-00922-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geo hazards International [GHI]. 2012. Made in Bhutan: The earthquake desk. Thimpu, Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• Giardini D. 1999. The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP) - 1992/1999. Annals of Geophysics 42(6): 957–974.
   Google Scholar
• Gocer, C. 2020. Field Investigation of the performance of unreinforced masonry building structures during the June 12, 2017, Lesvos earthquake in the Aegean Sea. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 34 (5): 04020095. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goda, K., E. D. Gibson, H. R. Smith, J. Biggs, and M. Hodge. 2016. Seismic Risk Assessment of Urban and Rural Settlements around Lake Malawi. Front. Built Environ. 2: 30.
   Google Scholar
• Grujic, D., L. S. Hollister, and R. R. Parrish. 2002. Himalayan metamorphic sequence as an orogenic channel: insight from Bhutan. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 198 (1–2): 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Grunthal, G. 1998. European macroseismic scale 1998. Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• Hetényi, G., R. Cattin, T. Berthet, N. Le Moigne, J. Chophel, S. Lechmann, P. Hammer, D. Drukpa, S. N. Sapkota, S. Gautier, and K. Thinley. 2016. Segmentation of the Himalayas as revealed by arc-parallel gravity anomalies. Scientific Reports 6: 33866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Htwe Zaw, S., T. Ornthammarath, and N. Poovarodom. 2019. Seismic Reconnaissance and Observed Damage after the Mw 6.8, 24 August 2016 Chauk (Central Myanmar). Earthquake23(2): 284–304.
   Google Scholar
• Maqsood, S. T., and J. Schwarz. 2010. Comparison of seismic vulnerability of buildings before and after 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 81: 85–98. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.81.1.85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, K., R. Hamburger, and R. Kennedy. 2007. Practical development and application of fragility functions. Structural Engineering Research Frontiers 1–16. doi: 10.1061/40944(249)23.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, K., R. Kennedy, and R. Bachman. 2007. Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 471–89. doi: 10.1193/1.2720892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkrishnan R., R. K. Sreevalsa, and T. G. Sitharam. 2019. Development of New Ground Motion Prediction Equation for the North and Central Himalayas Using Recorded Strong Motion Data. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2019.1605318
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, J. E., B. J. Lizundia, S. Yangdhen, Y. Lotay, A. Hortaçsu, and K. D. Tshering. 2014. Post-earthquake safety evaluation procedures for Bhutan buildings. Proceedings of the Tenth U.S. Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska.
   Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., and A. Elnashai. 2003. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures 25 (10): 1241–63. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Government of Bhutan-United Nations Development Program-The world Bank. 2009. Joint Rapid Assessment for Recovery, Reconstruction and Risk Reduction. The Royal Government of Bhutan, Thimpu, Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• Sferrazza Papa, G., and B. Silva. 2018. Assessment of post-earthquake damage: St. salvatore church in acquapagana, central Italy. Buildings 8 (3): 45. doi: 10.3390/buildings8030045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, J. Lee, and T. Naganuma. 2002. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M., and M. Lutman. 1996. Seismic behavior of masonry walls: Modeling of hysteretic rules. Journal of Structural Engineering. doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1996)122:9(1048).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varum, H., R. Dumaru, A. Furtado, A. R. Barbosa, D. Gautam, and H. Rodrigues. 2017. Seismic performance of buildings in Nepal After the Gorkha Earthquake. Impacts and Insights of Gorkha Earthquake 47–63. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812808-4.00003-1.
   Google Scholar