Assessment of the Seismic Performance and the Base Shear Contribution Ratios of the RC Wall-frame Dual System Considering Soil–Structure Interaction

References

• ACI Committee 318. 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318M- 14) and commentary, 503. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Aldaikh, H., N. A. Alexander, E. Ibraim, and O. Oddbjornsson. 2015. Two dimensional numerical and experimental models for the study of structure–soil–structure interaction involving three buildings. Computers and Structures 150: 79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Allotey, N. K., and M. H. El Naggar. 2008. An investigation into the Winkler modeling of the cyclic response of rigid footings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28 (1): 44–57. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosini, R. D., J. D. Riera, and R. F. Danesi. 2000. On the in influence of foundation flexibility on the seismic response of structures. Computers and Geotechnics 27: 179–97. doi: 10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00010-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington D.C: FEMA 356, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI-7-10, Reston, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2017. ASCE 41-17 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Reston, VA, Virginia: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Behnamfar, F., and M. Banizadeh. 2016. Effects of soil-structure interaction on distribution of seismic vulnerability in RC structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 80: 73–86. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulanger, R. W., C. J. Curras, B. L. Kutter, D. W. Wilson, and A. Abghari. 1999. Seismic soil pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 125 (9): 750–59. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, G. A., and J. B. Mander. 1994. Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: Part I –Evaluation of seismic capacity. NCEER Technical Report No. NCEER-94-0006, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., and S. C. ‐. S. Yim. 1985. Simplified earthquake analysis of structures with foundation uplift. Journal of Structural Engineering 111 (4): 906–30. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(906).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, R. W., and J. Penzien. 2003. Dynamics of structures. Third ed. Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Das, B. M. 2010. Geotechnical engineering handbook. Plantation, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Emami, A. R., and A. M. Halabian. 2018. Damage index distributions in RC dual lateral load-resistant multi-story buildings considering SSI effects under bidirectional earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami 12 (1): 1850004. doi: 10.1142/S1793431118500045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eser, M., C. Aydemir, and I. Ekiz. 2011. Effects of soil structure interaction on strength reduction factors. Procedia Engineering 14: 1696–704. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.213.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA P695. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Technical Report P695, Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Filippou, F. C., E. P. Popov, and V. V. Bertero. 1983. Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints. Report EERC 83–19, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA
   Google Scholar
• Ganjavi, B., I. Hajirasouliha, and A. Bolourchi. 2016. Optimum lateral load distribution for seismic design of nonlinear shear-buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 88: 356–68. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazetas, B. 1991. Formulas and charts for impedances of surface and embedded foundations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE 117 (9): 1363–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gazetas, B., and G. Mylonakis. 1998. Settlement and additional internal forces of grouped piles in layered soil. Géotechnique 48 (1): 55–72. doi: 10.1680/geot.1998.48.1.55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghandil, M., and F. Behnamfar. 2017. Ductility demands of MRF structures on soft soils considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 92: 203–14. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halabian, A. M., and A. R. Emami. 2013. Effect of foundation flexibility on inelastic response of 3D R/C frame structures under near‐fault ground motions. Structures and Buildings, ICE 167 (2): 123–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamidi Jamnani, H., J. Vaseghi Amiri, and H. Rajabnejad. 2018. Energy distribution in RC shear wall-frame structures subject to repeated earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 107: 116–28. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, C. W., and T. C. Hutchinson. 2009. Beam-on-nonlinear-Winkler-foundation modeling of shallow, rocking-dominated footinǵs. Earthquake Spectra 25 (2): 277–300. doi: 10.1193/1.3110482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, C. W., T. C. Hutchinson, G. R. Martin, and B. L. Kutter 2005. Numerical modeling of the nonlinear cyclic response of shallow foundations. Rep. No. 2005/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hokmabadi, A., B. Fatahi, and B. Samali. 2014. Assessment of soil-pile-structure interaction influencing seismic response of mid-rise buildings sitting on floating pile foundations. Computers and Geotechnics 55: 172–86. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T. C., P. Raychowdhury, and B. J. Chang 2006. Nonlinear structure and foundation response during seismic loading: Dual lateral load resisting systems. Proceedings of the 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering San Francisco, California
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and J. P. Stewart. 2003. Kinematic soil-structure interaction from strong motion recordings. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129 (4): 323–35. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:4(323).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolozvari, K., K. Orakcal, and J. W. Wallace 2015. Shear-flexure interaction modeling for reinforced concrete structural walls and columns under shear-flexure interaction modeling for reinforced. Rep. No. 2015/12, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., X. Lu, X. Lu, and L. Ye. 2014. Influence of soil–structure interaction on seismic collapse resistance of super-tall buildings. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 6 (5): 477–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.04.006.
   Google Scholar
• Marzban, S., M. Banazadeh, and A. Azarbakht. 2014. Seismic performance of reinforced concrete shear wall frames considering soil-foundation-structure interaction. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 23: 302–18. doi: 10.1002/tal.1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. Scott, and G. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees)-User command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).
   Google Scholar
• Menegotto, M., and E. Pinto. 1973. Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. Proceedings, IABSE Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Mylonakis, G., and G. Gazetas. 2000. Seismic soil-structure interaction: Beneficial or detrimental? Journal of Earthquake Engineering 4 (3): 277–301. doi: 10.1080/13632460009350372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIST GCR 12-917-21. 2012. Soil–Structure interaction for building structures. Prepared by NEHRP consultants joint venture (a partnership of the Applied Technology Council and the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering).
   Google Scholar
• Orakcal, K. 2004. Nonlinear modeling and analysis of slender reinforced concrete walls. Ph.D. Diss., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Orakcal, K., D. Ulugtekin, and L. M. Massone 2012. Constitutive modeling of reinforced concrete panel behavior under cyclic loading. Proceedings, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Petridis, C., and D. Pitilakis. 2020. Fragility curve modifiers for reinforced concrete dual buildings, including nonlinear site effects and soil–structure interaction. Earthquake Spectra 36: 8755293020919430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raychowdhury, P., and T. C. Hutchinson. 2008. Nonlinear material models for Winkler-based shallow foundation response evaluation. In Proceedings of GeoCongress 2008: Characterization, monitoring, and modeling of GeoSystems, ed. A. N. Alshawabkeh, K. R. Reddy, and M. V. Khire, 686–93. New Orleans, LA: ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 179.
   Google Scholar
• Raychowdhury, P. 2009. Effect of soil parameter uncertainty on seismic demand of low-rise steel buildings on dense silty sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 29 (10): 1367–78. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raychowdhury, P., and P. Singh. 2012. Effect of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on seismic response of low-rise SMRF buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 11 (4): 541–51. doi: 10.1007/s11803-012-0140-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raychowdhury, P., and T. C. Hutchinson. 2011. Performance of seismically loaded shearwalls on nonlinear shallow foundations. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 35 (7): 846–58. doi: 10.1002/nag.931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzi, S., C. Madiai, and G. Vannucchi. 2013. A simplified empirical method for assessing seismic soil-structure interaction effects on ordinary shear-type buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 55: 100–07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakib, H., and F. Homaei. 2017. Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of the soil-structure interaction effect on seismic response of mid-rise setback steel buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (7): 2827–51. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0087-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakib, H., and G. R. Atefatdoost. 2011. Effect of soil-structure interaction on torsional response of asymmetric wall type systems. Procedia Engineering 14: 1729–36. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.217.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. P., R. B. Seed, and G. L. Fenves 1998. Empirical evaluation of inertial soil-structure interaction effects. Report No. PEER-98/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 209.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., and J. Zhang. 2011. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of a slender RC shear wall considering soil-structure interaction effects. Engineering Structures 33 (1): 218–29. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toutanji, H. 1997. The effect of foundation flexibility on the interaction between shear walls and frames. Engineering Structures 19 (12): 1036–42. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulugtekin, D. 2010. Analytical modeling of reinforced concrete panel elements under reversed cyclic loading. M.S. Thesis, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Veletsos, A. S., M. A. Prasad, and Y. Tang 1988. Design approaches for soil structure interaction. Technical report NCEER-88-00331, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Vulcano, A., V. V. Bertero, and V. Colotti 1988. Analytical modeling of RC structural walls. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, V.6, 41–46, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. V., and F. E. Richart 1967. Design procedures for dynamically loaded foundations. ASCE 93, Soil Mechanics and Foundations Div., 169–93.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, E. 1868. Die Lehre von der Elasticitaet und Festigkeit: Mitbesonderer Rücksicht aufihre Anwendung in der Technik, für polytechnische Schulen, Bauakademien, Ingenieure, Maschinenbauer, Architekten, etc., 352. Prag: Verlag H. Dominicus.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. P. 1997. Spring-dashpot-mass models for foundation vibrations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 26: 931–49. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199709)26:9<931::AID-EQE686>3.0.CO;2-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L. U., I. Hajirasouliha, and A. M. Marshall. 2016. Performance-based seismic design of flexible-base multi-storey buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Engineering Structures 108: 90–103. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar