Collapse Capacity of Ordinary RC Moment Frames Considering Mainshock-Aftershock Effects

References

• ACI. 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318-14. American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Altoontash, A. 2004. Simulation and damage models for performance assessment of reinforced concrete beam-column joints. California: Joints Stanford university California.
   Google Scholar
• Amadio, C., M. Fragiacomo, and S. Rajgelj. 2003. The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non‐linear response of SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 32 (2): 291–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE. 2016. ASCE 7-16: Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Aschheim, M., and E. Black. 1999. Effects of prior earthquake damage on response of simple stiffness-degrading structures. Earthquake Spectra 15 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Di Trapani, F., M. Malavisi. 2019. Seismic fragility assessment of infilled frames subject to mainshock/aftershock sequences using a double incremental dynamic analysis approach. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (1): 211–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, H. Varum, and A. António. 2018. MS-AS damage assessment of infilled RC structures. Engineering Structures 175: 645–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., H. Rodrigues, K. K. Bhetwal, P. Neupane, and Y. Sanada. 2016. Common structural and construction deficiencies of Nepalese buildings. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1 (1): 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, R., L. Yue, and J. van de Lindt. 2014. Assessment of seismic performance of buildings with incorporation of aftershocks. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 29 (3): 04014088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., and A. A. Liolios. 2010. Nonlinear behaviour of RC frames under repeated strong ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30 (10): 1010–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalali, S. A. 2019. Commits to opensees in github repository. Accessed May 19 2019. https://github.com/OpenSees/OpenSees/commits?author=sa-jalali
   Google Scholar
• Jalali, S. A., and E. Darvishan. 2019. Seismic demand assessment of self-centering steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, J. S., R. DesRoches, I. Brilakis, and L. N. Lowes. 2012. Aftershock fragility curves for damaged non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal
   Google Scholar
• Kao, H., and W.-P. Chen. 2000. The Chi-Chi earthquake sequence: Active, out-of-sequence thrust faulting in Taiwan. Science 288 (5475): 2346–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K., Y. Takahashi, G. Hanbin, W. Zhishen, and J. Zhang. 2009. Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 13 (7): 965–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krausmann, E., A. M. Cruz, and B. Affeltranger. 2010. The impact of the 12 may 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 23 (2): 242–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., and D. A. Foutch. 2004. Performance evaluation of damaged steel frame buildings subjected to seismic loads. Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (4): 588–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, M., F. Naeim, S. C. Huang, H. K. Lam, and L. D. Carpenter. 2000. Geotechnical and geological effects of the 21 september 1999 Chi‐Chi earthquake, Taiwan. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings 9 (2): 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2007. Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock–aftershock earthquake sequences. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (3): 405–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., R. Song, and J. W. Van De Lindt. 2014. Collapse fragility of steel structures subjected to earthquake MS-AS sequences. Journal of Structural Engineering 140 (12): 04014095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahin, S. A. 1980. Effects of duration and aftershocks on inelastic design earthquakes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th world conference on earthquake engineering. Istanbul. Turkey
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering 114 (8): 1804–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2004. OpenSees users manual. Berkeley: PEER Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Nazari, N., J. W. Van De Lindt, and Y. Li. 2013. Effect of MS-AS sequences on woodframe building damage fragilities. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 29 (1): 04014036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M., and D. Steenkamp. 2012. The economic impact of the Canterbury earthquakes. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin 75 (3): 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Raghunandan, M., A. B. Liel, and N. Luco. 2015. Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (3): 419–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-García, J., and J. C. Negrete-Manriquez. 2011. Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences. Engineering Structures 33 (2): 621–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz–García, J., and J. D. Aguilar. 2015. Aftershock seismic assessment taking into account postmainshock residual drifts. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (9): 1391–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, H., N. Luco, S. R. Uma, and A. B. Liel. 2011. Developing fragilities for mainshock-damaged structures through incremental dynamic analysis. Paper presented at the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Sunasaka, Y., and A. S. Kiremidjian. 1993. A method for structural safety evaluation under MS-AS earthquake sequences. Report no.105. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center. Stanford University, Stanford, California
   Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., K. Goda, and G. Mondal. 2015. Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame with unreinforced masonry infill due to main shock–aftershock earthquake sequences. Earthquake Spectra 31 (3): 1427–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS. 2018a. M 9.1 - near the east coast of Honshu, Japan. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/official20110311054624120_30#executive
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2018b. M 8.6 - off the west coast of northern Sumatra. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/official20120411083836720_20#executive
   Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., and C. Allin Cornell. 2002. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31 (3): 491–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Lindt, J. W. 2008. Experimental investigation of the effect of multiple earthquakes on woodframe structural integrity. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction 13 (3): 111–17.
   Google Scholar
• Varum, H., R. Dumaru, A. Furtado, A. R. Barbosa, D. Gautam, and H. Rodrigues. 2018. Seismic performance of buildings in Nepal after the Gorkha earthquake. Impacts and Insights of the Gorkha Earthquake, Chapter 3. 47–63. Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y.-J., and L. Yue. 2010. Loss estimation of light-frame wood construction subjected to MS-AS sequences. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 25 (6): 504–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar