Preference of Hybrid Steel Frame with Exclusive Seismic Performance Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

References

• Abolmaali, A., A. Kukreti, A. Motahari, and M. Ghassemieh. 2009. Energy dissipation characteristics of semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 65 (5):1187–97. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abolmaali, A., M. Razavi, and D. Radulova. 2012. On the concept of earthquake resistant hybrid steel frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 68 (1): 34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE 2006. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-05, including Supplement No. 1, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia
   Google Scholar
• Astaneh, A., M. N. Nader, and L. Malik. 1989. Cyclic behavior of double angle connections. Journal of Structural Engineering 115 (5): 1101–18. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:5(1101).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M., C. M. Uang, and R. Sabelli. 2011. Ductile design of steel structures. Second ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-F., and N. Kishi. 1989. Semirigid steel beam-to-column connections: Data base and modeling. Journal of Structural Engineering 115 (1):105–19. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:1(105).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA, 2000b, State of the art report on system performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking, FEMA 355C Report, prepared by the SAC Joint Venture Partnership for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Ghassemieh, M., and N. Vhedi. Seismic evaluation of Hybrid steel frames with different patterns of semi-rigid connection. The 2015 World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (ASEM15), Incheon, Korea, August 25-29, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., and H. Krawinkler. Seismic demands for the performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures. Report No. 132, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, L. F., and H. Krawinkler. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, L. F., R. A. Medina, and H. Krawinkler. 2005. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (12): 1489–511. doi: 10.1002/eqe.495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., and A. Labib. 2009. Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: Benefits and limitations. OR Insight 22 (4): 201–20. doi: 10.1057/ori.2009.10.
   Google Scholar
• Kasai, K., B. F. Maison, and A. Mayangarum. Effects of partially restrained connection stiffness and strength on frame seismic performance. SAC/BD-99/17, SAC Joint Venture (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-E., and V.-H. Truong. 2020. Reliability evaluation of semirigid steel frames using advanced analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering 146 (5):04020064. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. A database in support of modeling of component deterioration for collapse prediction of steel frame structures. ASCE Structures Congress, Long Beach, California, May 16-19, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. Sidesway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations. Technical Report 172, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. 2010. Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. Journal of Structural Engineering 137 (11): 1291–302. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maison, B. F., C. O. Rex, S. D. Lindsey, and K. Kasai. 2000. Performance of PR moment frame buildings in UBC seismic zones 3 and 4. Journal of Structural Engineering 126 (1): 108–16. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(108).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, user command-language manual. Berkeley (CA): Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• PEER Report 2010/111. Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Radulova, D. 2009. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of hybrid frames. A Thesis submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirement for degree of Master of Science. Arlington: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, M. 2013. On the concept of earthquake resistant hybrid steel frames. PhD diss., University of Texas Arlington. http://hdl.handle.net/10106/11855
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, M., and A. Abolmaali. 2014. Earthquake resistance frames with combination of rigid and semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 98: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1994. Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 74 (3): 426–47. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 2000. Fundamentals of decision ma,king and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Vol. 6. 1st ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Rws Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 2006. Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research 168 (2): 557–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1 (1): 83–98. doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., and A. Astaneh. 2000. Hysteresis model of bolted-angle connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 54 (3): 317–43. doi: 10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00070-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou, E., and S. H. Mann. 1995. Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: Some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice 2 (1): 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• UBC BS. Edition NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., J. Wang, and H. Wang. 2017. Seismic behavior of blind bolted CFST frames with semi-rigid connections. Structures 9: 91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2016.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., and X. Zhu. 2016. Nonlinear dynamic collapse analysis of semi-rigid steel frames based on the finite particle method. Engineering Structures 1 (118):383–93. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.063.
   Google Scholar