296
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Seismic Loss Prediction for Infilled RC Buildings via Simplified Analytical Method

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 5477-5510 | Received 27 Jul 2020, Accepted 04 Jan 2021, Published online: 07 Mar 2021

References

  • Ahmad, N., H. Crowley, and R. Pinho 2010. Analytical fragility functions for reinforced concrete and masonry buildings and building aggregates. UPAV-Internal Report
  • Aslani, H., and E. Miranda, 2005. Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings. J. A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center. Research report n. 157. California, United States: Stanford.
  • ATC - Applied Technology Council. 2012a. FEMA P-58 next-generation seismic performance assessment for buildings. Vol. 1 - Methodology. Washington, DC: Methodology, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  • ATC - Applied Technology Council. 2012b. FEMA P-58 next-generation seismic performance assessment for buildings. Vol. 2 - Implementation Guide. Washington, DC: Implementation, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  • B.U.R.A. (Official Journal of Regione Abruzzo) (n. 10—08/03/2017—ordinary). 2017. Price list of public works in Abruzzi region. Italy. (in Italian).
  • Baggio, C., A. Bernardini, R. Colozza, S. Coppari, L. Corazza, M. Della Bella, G. Di Pasquale, M. Dolce, A. Goretti, A. Martinelli, et al. (2007) Field manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short-term countermeasures. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 22868 EN-2007. Translation from Italian: Goretti A., Rota M.
  • Bal, I. E., H. Crowley, R. Pinho, and F. G. Gulay, 2007. Structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock in Northern Marmara region for loss assessment applications. ROSE Research Report No. 2007/03. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
  • Bird, J. F., J. J. Bommer, J. D. Bray, R. Sancio, and R. J. S. Spence. 2004. Comparing loss estimation with observed damage in a zone of ground failure: A study of the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2 (3): 329–60. doi: 10.1007/s10518-004-3804-0.
  • Biskinis, D., and M. N. Fardis. 2010. Deformations at flexural yielding of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars. Structural Concrete 11 (3): 128–38.
  • Borzi, B., R. Pinho, and H. Crowley. 2008. Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large scale assessment of RC buildings. Engineering Structures 30 (3): 804–20. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021.
  • Bramerini, F., G. Di Pasquale, G. Orsini, A. Pugliese, R. W. Romeo, and F. Sabetta 1995. Rischio sismico del territorio italiano. In Proceedings 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering in Italy (Vol. 3, pp. 1099–108), Siena: September 1995.
  • Cardone, D. 2016. Fragility Curves and Loss functions for RC structural components with smooth rebars. Earthquakes and Structures 10 (5): 1181–212. doi: 10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1181.
  • Cardone, D., and G. Perrone. 2015. Developing fragility curves and loss functions for masonry infill walls. Earthquakes and Structures 9 (1): 257–79. doi: 10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.257.
  • Cardone, D., and G. Perrone. 2017. Damage and loss assessment of pre-70 RC frame buildings with FEMA P-58. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (1): 23–61. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1149893.
  • Cardone, D., G. Perrone, and A. Flora. 2020. Displacement-based simplified seismic loss assessment of Pre-70S RC buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 24 (sup1): 82–113. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2020.1716890.
  • Cardone, D., T. J. Sullivan, G. Gesualdi, and G. Perrone. 2017. Simplified estimation of the expected annual loss of reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (12): 2009–32.
  • CEN. 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
  • Chioccarelli, E., F. De Luca, and I. Iervolino (2009). Preliminary study of L’Aquila earthquake ground motion records V5. 20. ReLuis Report. http://www.reluis.it
  • Circolare del Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici. n. 617 del 2/2/2009. Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle “Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni” di cui al DM 14 gennaio 2008. (in Italian)
  • Colangelo, F. 2013. Drift-sensitive non-structural damage to masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames designed to Eurocode 8. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11 (6): 2151–76. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9503-y.
  • Colonna, E., C. Molina, and V. Petrini (1994) Criteri di valutazione della vulnerabilità sismica del patrimonio edilizio esistente sul territorio nazionale. Ingegneria Sismica, n. 1. Gen-Apr. 1994.
  • Cornell, C. A., and H. Krawinkler 2000. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER News, April 2000. 3(2).
  • De Martino, G., M. Di Ludovico, A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2017. Estimation of repair costs for RC and masonry residential buildings based on damage data collected by post-earthquake visual inspection. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (4): 1681–706. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-0039-9.
  • De Risi, M. T., C. Del Gaudio, P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2018. In-plane behaviour and damage assessment of masonry infills with hollow clay bricks in RC frames. Engineering Structures 168: 257–75. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.065.
  • De Risi, M. T., C. Del Gaudio, and G. M. Verderame. 2020. A component-level methodology to evaluate the seismic repair costs of infills and services for Italian RC buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (14): 6533–70. doi: 10.1007/s10518-020-00944-7.
  • Del Gaudio, C., M. T. De Risi, and G. M. Verderame, 2020. Toward a simplified evaluation of seismic repair costs for RC buildings with masonry infills. In 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, September 13th to 18th 2020. Sendai, Japan: 17WCEE. Paper N° C003618
  • Del Gaudio, C., P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2018. A class-oriented mechanical approach for seismic damage assessment of RC buildings subjected to the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0365-1.
  • Del Gaudio, C., P. Ricci, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2015. Development and urban-scale application of a simplified method for seismic fragility assessment of RC buildings. Engineering Structures 91: 40–57. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.031.
  • Del Gaudio, C., P. Ricci, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2016. Observed and predicted earth-quake damage scenarios: The case study of Pettino (L’Aquila) after the 6th April 2009 event. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14 (10): 2643–78. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9919-2.
  • Del Gaudio, C., P. Ricci, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2017. Urban-scale seismic fragility assessment of RC buildings subjected to L’Aquila earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 96: 49–63. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.02.003.
  • Del Gaudio, C., A. Rosti, M. Rota, P. Ricci, A. Penna, and G. M. Verderame, 2019a. Derivazione di curve di fragilità empiriche per edifici residenziali in c.a. In Atti del XVIII Convegno Nazionale in Ingegneria Sismica ANIDIS, Settembre 15-19. Ascoli Piceno, Italia.
  • Del Gaudio, M. T., C. De Risi, P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2019b. Empirical drift‑fragility functions and loss estimation for infills in reinforced concrete frames under seismic loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (3): 1285–330. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0501-y.
  • Del Vecchio, C., M. Di Ludovico, S. Pampanin, and A. Prota. 2018. Repair costs of existing RC buildings damaged by the L’Aquila earthquake and comparison with FEMA P-58 predictions. Earthquake Spectra 34 (1): 237–63. doi: 10.1193/122916EQS257M.
  • Del Vecchio, C., M. Di Ludovico, and A. Prota. 2020. Repair costs of RC building components: From actual data analysis to calibrated consequence functions. Earthquake Spectra 36 (1): 353–77.
  • Di Pasquale, G., and G. Orsini 1998. A probabilistic model for the assessment of the earthquake economic losses in Italy. In Proceedings International Conference ‘Risk Analysis 98ʹ, Valencia, Spain, (p. 1998).
  • Di Pasquale, G., G. Orsini, and R. W. Romeo. 2005. New developments in seismic risk assessment in Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 3 (1): 101–28. doi: 10.1007/s10518-005-0202-1.
  • DM n. 40 3/3/1975, Approval of the technical standards for constructions in seismic zones, official gazette n. 93 of 8/4/1975. (in Italian)
  • Dolce, M., B. Borzi, F. da Porto, M. Faravelli, S. Lagomarsino, G. Magenes, C. Moroni, A. Penna, A. Prota, E. Speranza, et al., 2019b. Mappe di rischio sismico per il territorio italiano. In XVIII Convegno ANIDIS 2019 “L’ingegneria sismica in Italia”, 15 settembre – 19 settembre 2019. Ascoli Piceno.
  • Dolce, M., and A. Goretti. 2015. Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (8): 2241–64. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9723-4.
  • Dolce, M., E. Speranza, F. Giordano, B. Borzi, F. Bocchi, C. Conte, A. Di Meo, M. Faravelli, and V. Pascale. 2019a. Observed damage database of past Italian earthquakes: The Da. DO WebGIS. Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata 60 (2): 141–64.
  • Dolšek, M., and P. Fajfar. 2002. Mathematical modelling of an infilled RC frame structure based on the results of pseudo-dynamic tests. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31 (6): 1215–30. doi: 10.1002/eqe.154.
  • Favvata, M. J., M. C. Naoum, and C. G. Karayannis. 2013. Limit states of RC structures with first floor irregularities. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 47 (6): 791–818. doi: 10.12989/sem.2013.47.6.791.
  • Grunthal, G. 1998. Cahiers du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie: Volume 15—European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Luxembourg: European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology.
  • Guagenti, E., C. Molina, and G. Mulas. 1988. Seismic risk analysis with predictable models. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 16 (3): 343–59. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290160305.
  • Health Ministery Decree of 5 July 1975. Amendments to the ministerial instructions of 20 June 1896, related to the minimum interstorey height and to the health and hygiene requirements of dwellings. G.U. n. 190 of 18 July 1975 (in italian).
  • Izzuddin, B. A., C. G. Karayannis, and A. S. Elnashai, Izzuddin et al. 1994. Advanced nonlinear formulation for reinforced concrete beam-columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 120 (10): 2913–34. and (1994). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2913).
  • Kakaletsis, D., and C. Karayannis. 2007. Experimental investigation of infilled R/C frames with eccentric openings. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 26 (3): 231–50. doi: 10.12989/sem.2007.26.3.231.
  • Kakaletsis, D. J., and C. G. Karayannis. 2009. Experimental investigation of infilled reinforced concrete frames with openings. ACI Structural Journal 106 (2): 132–41.
  • Karayannis, C. G., B. A. Izzuddin, and A. S. Elnashai. 1994. Application of adaptive analysis to reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Structural Engineering 120 (10): 2935–57. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2935).
  • Krawinkler, H., and E. Miranda 2004. Performance-based earthquake engineering. In Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering, (pp. 9-1-9-59). Chapter 9.
  • Landi, L., D. Saborio-Romano, D. P. Welch, and T. J. Sullivan. 2020. Displacement-based simplified seismic loss assessment of post-70s RC buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 24 (sup1): 114–45. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2020.1735577.
  • Masi, A., L. Chiauzzi, G. Santarsiero, V. Manfredi, S. Biondi, E. Spacone, C. Del Gaudio, P. Ricci, G. Manfredi, and G. M. Verderame. 2017. Seismic response of RC buildings during the Mw 6.0 August 24, 2016 Central Italy earthquake: The Amatrice case study. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0277-5.
  • Masi, A., and M. Vona. 2009. Estimation of the in-situ concrete strength: Provisions of the European and Italian seismic codes and possible improvements. In E. Cosenza (editor), Eurocode 8 perspectives from the Italian standpoint workshop, (pp. 67–77). Doppiavoce, Naples, Italy.
  • Michelini, A., L. Faenza, V. Lauciani, and L. Malagnini. 2008. ShakeMap implementation in Italy. Seismological Research Letters 79 (5): 688–97. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.79.5.688.
  • Miranda, E. 2001. Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (9): 1005–12. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1005).
  • O’Reilly, G. J., and T. J. Sullivan. 2018. Probabilistic seismic assessment and retrofit considerations for Italian RC frame buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (3): 1447–85. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0257-9.
  • Panagiotakos, T. B., and M. N. Fardis 1996. Seismic response of infilled RC frames structures. In Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Acapulco, México. Paper No. 225.
  • Perrone, G., D. Cardone, G. J. O’Reilly, and T. J. Sullivan. 2019. Developing a direct approach for estimating expected annual losses of Italian buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–32. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1657988.
  • Ramirez, C. M. 2009. Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplifiedperformance-based earthquake engineering. Stanford University, United States, May 2009.
  • Ricci, P. 2010. Seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings. PhD thesis, Naples, Italy: University of Naples Federico II.
  • Ricci, P., M. T. De Risi, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2013. Influence of infill distribution and design typology on seismic performance of low-and mid-rise RC buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11 (5): 1585–616. doi: 10.1007/s10518-013-9453-4.
  • Rosti, A., C. Del Gaudio, M. Rota, P. Ricci, A. Penna, and G. M. Verderame 2019a. Uso di curve di fragilità empiriche per la valutazione del rischio sismico a scala nazionale. In XVIII Convegno ANIDIS 2019 “L’ingegneria sismica in Italia, 15 settembre – 19 settembre 2019. Ascoli Piceno.
  • Rosti, A., M. Rota, G. Magenes, and A. Penna 2019b. Derivazione di curve di fragilità empiriche per edifici residenziali in muratura. In Atti del XVIII Convegno Nazionale in Ingegneria Sismica ANIDIS, Settembre 15-19. Ascoli Piceno, Italia.
  • Sassun, K., T. J. Sullivan, P. Morandi, and D. Cardone. 2016. Characterising the in-plane seismic performance of infill masonry. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 49 (1): 98–115. March 2016. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.49.1.98-115.
  • Silva, V., D. Amo-Oduro, A. Calderon, J. Dabbeek, V. Despotaki, L. Martins, A. Rao, M. Simionato, D. Viganò, C. Yepes, et al. (2018). Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Seismic Risk Map (version 2018.1). doi: 10.13117/GEM-GLOBAL-SEISMIC-RISK-MAP-2018.1
  • Spacone, E., F. C. Filippou, and F. F. Taucer. 1996. Fibre beam–column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames: Part I. Formulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 25 (7): 711–25. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199607)25:7<711::AID-EQE576>3.0.CO;2-9.
  • Stucchi, M., A. Akinci, E. Faccioli, P. Gasperini, L. Malagnini, C. Meletti, V. Montaldo, and G. Valensise, 2004. Mappa di Pericolosità sismica del territorio Nazionale http://zonesismiche.mi.ingv.it/documenti/rapportoconclusivo.pdf, accessed online in March 2020.
  • Stucchi, M., C. Meletti, V. Montaldo, H. Crowley, G. M. Calvi, and E. Boschi. 2011. Seismic hazard assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian building code. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101 (4): 1885–911. doi: 10.1785/0120100130.
  • Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2006. Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35 (9): 1097–117. doi: 10.1002/eqe.573.
  • Verderame, G. M., G. Manfredi, and G. Frunzio. 2001. Le proprietà meccaniche dei calcestruzzi impiegati nelle strutture in cemento armato realizzate negli anni ‘60. In Atti del X congresso nazionale ANIDIS “L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia, September 9- 13.(in Italian). Italy: Potenza-Matera.
  • Verderame, G. M., M. Polese, C. Mariniello, and G. Manfredi. 2010. A simulated design procedure for the assessment of seismic capacity of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Advances in Engineering Software 41 (2): 323–35. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.06.011.
  • Verderame, G. M., P. Ricci, M. Esposito, and G. Manfredi. 2012. STIL v1.0 - Software per la caratterizzazione delle proprietà meccaniche degli acciai da c.a. tra il 1950 e il 2000. ReLUIS, http://www.reluis.it/, accessed online in March 2020.
  • Welch, D. P., T. J. Sullivan, and G. M. Calvi. 2014. Developing direct displacement-based procedures for simplified loss assessment in performance-based earthquake engineering. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18 (2): 290–322. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.851046.
  • Yang, W. S., D. Slejko, and D. Viezzoli. 1989. Seismic risk in Friuli-Venezia Giulia: An approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 8 (2): 96–105. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(89)80016-8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.