Assessment of Multi-Criteria Evaluation Procedures for Identification of Optimal Seismic Retrofitting Strategies for Existing RC Buildings

References

• Akguzel, U., and S. Pampanin. 2012. Assessment and design procedure for the seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete beam-column joints using FRP composite materials. . Journal of Composites for Construction 16 (1): 21–34. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkar, S., M. A. Sandikkaya, and J. J. Bommer. 2014. Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Earthquake Engineering 12: 359–387. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9461-4.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Report No. FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC) .1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Report No. ATC-40: 1–2, Redwood City, California.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC). 2009a. Engineering guidelines for incremental seismic rehabilitation. Report No. FEMA P-420, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC). 2009b. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Report No. FEMA P695, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC). 2012a. Seismic performance assessment of buildings: Volume 1 – Methodology. Report No. FEMA P58-1, Washington, D.C
   Google Scholar
• Applied Technology Council (ATC). 2012b. Seismic performance assessment of buildings Volume 3—Performance Assessment Calculation Tool (PACT) Version 2.9.65. Report No. FEMA P58-3, Washington, D.C
   Google Scholar
• Aslani, H., and E. Miranda. 2005. Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings, Report No. 157. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. 2015. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–99. doi: 10.1193/021113EQS025M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., and A. Marini. 2016. Does seismic risk affect the environmental impact of existing buildings? Energy and Buildings 110: 149–58. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzi, B., P. Ceresa, M. Faravelli, E. Fiorini, and M. Onida. 2013. Seismic risk assessment of Italian school buildings. Computational methods in earthquake engineering. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences 30: 317–44. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6573-3_16.
   Google Scholar
• Calvi, G. M. 2013. Choices and criteria for seismic strengthening. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 17 (6): 769–802. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.781556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., G. Gesualdi, and G. Perrone. 2017. Cost-benefit analysis of alternative retrofit strategies for RC frame buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 23: 208–41. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1323041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardone, D., and G. Perrone. 2017. Damage and loss assessment of Pre-70 RC frame buildings with FEMA P-58. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (1): 23–61. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1149893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carofilis, W., D. Perrone, G. O’Reilly, R. Monteiro, and A. Filiatrault. 2020. Seismic retrofit of existing school buildings in Italy: Performance evaluation and loss estimation. Engineering Structures 225: 111243. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caterino, N., I. Iervolino, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2008. Multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of RC structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12 (4): 555–83. doi: 10.1080/13632460701572872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caterino, N., I. Iervolino, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2009. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 24 (1): 14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00599.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P. 2013. Resilience-based design (RBD) modelling of civil infrastructure to assess seismic hazards. In Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems, ed. S. Tesfamariam and K. Goda. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing. doi: 10.1533/9780857098986.2.268.
   Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2008. Seismic resilience of a hospital system. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 6 (1–2): 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, M. C., T. T. Soong, and G. F. Dargush. 1998. Monograph No 1. Multidisciplinary center for earthquake engineering research. In Passive energy dissipation systems for structural design and retrofit, ed. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 299. Buffalo: University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cosenza, E., C. Del Vecchio, M. Di Ludovico, M. Dolce, C. Moroni, A. Prota, and E. Renzi. 2018. The Italian guidelines for seismic risk classification of constructions: Technical principles and validation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (12): 5905–35. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0431-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Risi, R., A. Sextos, P. Zimmaro, A. Simonelli, and J. Stewart. 2018. The 2016 Central Italy earthquakes sequence: Observations of incremental building damage. Proceedings of the 11th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Decreto Legislativo 163/2006. 2015. Elenco regionale dei prezzi delle opere pubbliche della regione Emilia-Romagna – 163/2006.
   Google Scholar
• Del Vecchio, C., M. Di Ludovico, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi. 2015. Analytical model and design approach for FRP strengthening of non-conforming RC corner beam–column joints. Engineering Structures 87: 8–20. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Cesare, A., and F. C. Ponzo. 2017. Seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frame buildings with hysteretic bracing systems: Design procedure and behaviour factor. Shock and Vibration 2017: 1–20. doi: 10.1155/2017/2639361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolšek, M., N. L. Sinković, and J. Žižmond. 2017. IM-based and EDP-based decision models for the verification of the seismic collapse safety of buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (15): 2665–82. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurocode 8 (EN 1998–3). 2005. Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and retrofit of buildings. Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. 2000. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra 16 (3): 573–92. doi: 10.1193/1.1586128.
   Google Scholar
• Filippou, F. C., E. P. Popov, and V. V. Bertero. 1983. Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic Behavior of reinforced concrete joints. Report EERC 83-19, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Foo, S., and A. Davenport. 2003. Seismic hazard mitigation for buildings. Natural Hazards 28 (2/3): 517–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1022950629065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, R., and C. Galasso. 2019. Shedding some light on multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of RC buildings. Earthquake risk and engineering towards a resilient world. Greenwich, London.
   Google Scholar
• Geoff, C. 2004. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Practical strategy. Open access material. Pearson Education Limited 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Global Earthquake Model (GEM). 2019. The openquake-engine user manual. Open- Quake Manual for Engine version 3.7.0. 183. 10.13117/GEM.OPENQUAKE.MAN.ENGINE.3.7.0
   Google Scholar
• Hadigheh, S. A., S. S. Mahini, and M. R. Maheri. 2014. Seismic behavior of FRP-retrofitted reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18 (8): 1171–97. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2014.926301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L., and K. Yoon. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 186. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Kadid, A., and D. Yahiaoui. 2011. Seismic assessment of braced RC frames. Procedia Engineering 14: 2899–905. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.365.
   Google Scholar
• Kohrangi, M., P. Bazzurro, D. Vamvatsikos, and A. Spillatura. 2017. Conditional spectrum-based ground motion record selection using average spectral acceleration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (10): 1667–85. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labò, S., C. Passoni, A. Marini, A. Belleri, G. Camata, P. Riva, and E. Spacone. 2017. Prefabricated responsive diagrids for holistic renovation of existing mid-rise RC buildings. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rhodes Island, Greece. https://www.eccomasproceedia.org/conferences/thematic-conferences/compdyn–2017/5719.
   Google Scholar
• Labò, S., E. Casprini, C. Passoni, J. Zanni, A. Belleri, A. Marini, and P. Riva. 2018. Application of low-invasive techniques and incremental seismic rehabilitation to increase the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of seismic interventions. Procedia Structural Integrity 11: 185–93. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.025.
   Google Scholar
• Liel, A. B., and G. G. Deierlein. 2013. Cost-benefit evaluation of seismic risk mitigation alternatives for older concrete frame buildings. Earthquake Spectra 29 (4): 1391–411. doi: 10.1193/030911EQS040M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., E. Karamanci, and G. A. Martin. 2012. Steel database for modelling post-buckling behavior and fracture of concentrically braced frames under earthquakes. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• ORFEUS WG5, Luzi, L., R. Puglia, and E. Russo. 2016. Engineering strong motion database, version 1.0. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia. Observatories & Research Facilities for European Seismology. doi: 10.13127/ESM.
   Google Scholar
• Mahini, S., S. A. Hadigheh, and S. Setunge. 2015. Seismic resilience of retrofitted reinforced concrete buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, A., and A. Tasnimi. 2008. Strengthening of low ductile reinforced concrete frames using steel X-bracings with different details. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzolani, F., A. Formisano, and G. Vaiano. 2018. Adeguamento sismico di edifici in cemento armato: BRB e FRP. Costruzioni Metalliche GEB-FEB2018: 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, F., M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2010. Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 24 (1): 95–107. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meletti, C., F. Galadini, G. Valensise, M. Stucchi, R. Basili, S. Barba, G. Vannucci, and E. Boschi. 2008. A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory. Tectonophysics 450 (1–4): 85–108. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menna, C., C. Del Vecchio, M. Di Ludovico, G. M. Mauro, F. Ascione, and A. Prota. 2021. Conceptual design of integrated seismic and energy retrofit interventions. Journal of Building Engineering. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102190
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Earthquake Commission, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Structural Engineering Society, New Zealand Geotechnical Society. 2017. The seismic assessment of existing building, C5- Concrete buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Mugahed, Y., A. Rayed, S. Raizal, A. Hisham, and C. Hunge. 2018. Properties and applications of FRP in strengthening RC structures: A review. Structures 16: 208–38. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2018.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norme Tecniche Per Le Costruzioni (NTC). 2018. Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G., D. Perrone, M. Fox, R. Monteiro, and A. Filiatrault. 2018. Seismic assessment and loss estimation of existing school buildings in Italy. Engineering Structures 168: 142–62. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. J., and T. J. Sullivan. 2018. Probabilistic seismic assessment and retrofit considerations for Italian RC frame buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (3): 1447–85. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0257-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampanin, S. 2006. Controversial aspects in seismic assessment and retrofit of structures in modern times: Understanding and implementing lessons from ancient heritage. Bulleting of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 39: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, D., G. O’Reilly, R. Monteiro, and A. Filiatrault. 2020. Assessing seismic risk in typical Italian school buildings: From in-situ survey to loss estimation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 44: 101448. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, K. A., J. L. Beck, and R. V. Shaikhutdinov. 2004. Simplified estimation of economic seismic risk for buildings. Earthquake Spectra 20 (4): 1239–63. doi: 10.1193/1.1809129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prebix, T. W., and P. Burke. 1989. Toward a philosophy for seismic retrofit: The Seattle experience. Earthquake Spectra 5 (3): 557–69. doi: 10.1193/1.1585540.
   Google Scholar
• Requena, M., A. Morales, P. Durand, and J. Estêvão. 2019. An index-based method for evaluating seismic retrofitting techniques. Application to a reinforced concrete primary school in Huelva. PLoS ONE 14 (4): e0215120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215120.2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sandikkaya, M., S. Akkar, and P. Bard. 2013. A nonlinear site-amplification model for the next Pan-European ground-motion predictions equations. Bulletin of the Seismology Society of America 130 (1): 1–32. doi: 10.1785/0120120008.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. H., and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam–Column elements. Journal of Structural Engineering 132 (2): 244–52. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:2(244).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira, M., and M. Goldenberg. 2005. AHP-based equipment selection model for construction projects. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 131 (12): 1263–73. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:12(1263).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, L., and R. Monteiro. 2018. Seismic retrofit options for non-structural building partition walls: Impact on loss estimation and cost-benefit analysis. Engineering Structures 161: 8–27. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. P., Z. Paolo, L. Giuseppe, and A. Ernesto. 2018. Reconnaissance of 2016 central Italy earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra 34 (4): 1547–55. doi: 10.1193/080317EQS151M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supplemento ordinario n. 5 alla Gazzeta Ufficiale. 2019. Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Taghavi, S., and E. Miranda. 2003. Response assessment of nonstructural building elements. PEER report 2003/05, Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Tasligedik, S., U. Akguzel, W. Kam, and S. Pampanin. 2018. Strength hierarchy at reinforced concrete beam-column joints and global capacity. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22 (3): 454–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1233916.
   Google Scholar
• Thermou, G. E., and A. S. Elnashai. 2002. Report about SPEAR project. Performance Parameters and Criteria for Assessment and Rehabilitation. A.S., I.C. of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Thermou, G. E., and A. S. Elnashai. 2002. Seismic retrofit schemes for RC structures and local-global consequences. Progress in Structural Engineering and Material 8 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1002/pse.208.
   Google Scholar
• Uriz, P., and S. A. Mahin. 2008. Toward earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures. PEER Report 2008/08, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., P. Gardoni, and J. Bracci. 2009. Decision analysis for seismic retrofit of structures. Structural Safety 31 (2): 188–96. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, X. K., J. G. Teng, L. De Lorenzis, and S. H. Xia. 2007. Optimal performance-based design of FRP jackets for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frames. Composites Part B: Engineering 38 (5–6): 584–97. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar