Experimental Investigation on the Possible Effect of Previous Damage, Workmanship and Test Setup on the Out-of-plane Behaviour of Masonry Infill Walls

References

• Akhoundi, F., G. Vasconcelos, and P. Lourenço. 2018. Experimental out-of-plane behavior of brick masonry infilled frames. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (2): 221–37. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2018.1529207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angel, R., D. Abrams, D. Shapiro, J. Uzarski, and M. Webster. 1994. Behavior of reinforced concrete frames, with masonry infills, Civil Engineering Studies, Reserach Series No. 589, UILU-ENG. 94–2005. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ilinois.
   Google Scholar
• Anić, F., D. Penava, L. Abrahamczyk, and V. Sarhosis. 2020. A review of experimental and analytical studies on the out-of-plane behaviour of masonry infilled frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (5): 2191–246. doi: 10.1007/s10518-019-00771-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris, P. G., L. Cavaleri, F. Trapani, and A. K. Tsaris. 2017. Numerical modelling of out-of-plane response of infilled frames: State of the art and future challenges for the equivalent strut macromodels. Engineering Structures 132: 110–22. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi, G., and D. Bolognini. 2001. Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with weakly reinforced masonry panels. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 5 (2): 153–85. doi: 10.1080/13632460109350390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaleri, L., M. Zizzo, and P. G. Asteris. 2020. Residual out-of-plane capacity of infills damaged by in-plane cyclic loads. Engineering Structures 209: 109957. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2006a. NP EN10002-1 - Tensile testing of mettalic materials - Part 1: Method of test at ambient temperature. European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2006b. EN 196–2006 Methods of testing cement (European Committee for Standardization).
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2016. NP EN 771–1: Especificações para unidades de alvenaria Parte 1: Unidades cerâmicas (tijolos cerâmicos).
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, Á., and E. Caetano. 2006. Experimental modal analysis of civil engineering structures. Sound and Vibration 40 (6): 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Porto, F., G. Guidi, N. Verlato, and C. Modena. 2015. Effectiveness of plasters and textile reinforced mortars for strengthening clay masonry infill walls subjected to combined in-plane/out-of-plane actions/Wirksamkeit von Putz und textilbewehrtem Mörtel bei der Verstärkung von Ausfachungswänden aus Ziegelmauerwerk, die kombinierter Scheiben- und Plattenbeanspruchung ausgesetzt sind. Mauerwerk 19 (5): 334–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dawe, J., and C. Seah. 1989. Behaviour of masonry infilled steel frames. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 16: 865–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis, A., and M. R. Pecce. 2018. Out-of-plane structural identification of a masonry infill wall inside beam-column RC frames. Engineering Structures 173: 546–58. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Risi, M. T., M. Di Domenico, P. Ricci, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2019. Experimental investigation on the influence of the aspect ratio on the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction for masonry infills in RC frames. Engineering Structures 189: 523–40. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Domenico, M., P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2020. Experimental assessment of the influence of boundary conditions on the out-of-plane response of unreinforced masonry infill walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 24 (6): 881–919. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1453411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., C. Costa, A. Arêde, and H. Rodrigues. 2016a. Geometric characterisation of Portuguese RC buildings with masonry infill walls. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 20 (4): 396–411. doi:10.1080/19648189.2015.1039660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, A. Arêde, and H. Varum. 2016b. Experimental evaluation of out-of-plane capacity of masonry infill walls. Engineering Structures 111: 48–63. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, A. Arêde, and H. Varum. 2017. Modal identification of infill masonry walls with different characteristics. Engineering Structures 145: 118–34. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, A. Arêde, and H. Varum. 2018a. Out-of-plane behavior of masonry infilled RC frames based on the experimental tests available: A systematic review. Construction and Building Materials 168: 831–48. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, A. Arêde, and H. Varum. 2020. Effect of the panel width support and columns axial load on the infill masonry walls out-of-plane behavior. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 24 (4): 653–81. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1453400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziotti, F., U. Tomassetti, S. Sharma, L. Grottoli, and G. Magenes. 2019. Experimental response of URM single leaf and cavity walls in out-of-plane two-way bending generated by seismic excitation. Construction and Building Materials 195: 650–70. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, M., J. Vaculik, N. Lam, J. Wilson, and E. Lumantarna. 2007. Cyclic testing of unreinforced masonry walls in two-way bending. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (6): 801–21. doi: 10.1002/eqe.654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidi, G., F. da Porto, M. Benetta, N. Verlato, and C. Modena. 2013. Comportamento Sperimentale nel Piano e Fuori Piano di Tamponamenti in Muratura Armata e Rinforzata. In Presented at the XV Convegno Nazionale ANIDIS - “L’INGEGNERIA SISMICA IN ITALIA. Padova, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Hak, S., P. Morandi, and G. Magenes. 2014. Out-of-plane experimental response of strong masonry infills. In Presented at the Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology - 2ECEES. Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Mazza, F. 2019. In-plane–out-of-plane non-linear model of masonry infills in the seismic analysis of r.c.-framed buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 48 (4): 432–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanesi, R., G. Magenes, P. Morandi, and S. Hak. 2020a. The interaction between in-plane and out-of-plane seismic response of modern strong masonry infills. In 17th International Brick/Block Masonry Conference (17thIB2MaC 2020). Krakow, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Milanesi, R., P. Morandi, C. F. Manzini, L. Albanesi, and G. Magenes. 2020b. Out-of-plane response of an innovative masonry infill with sliding joints from shaking table tests. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–35. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2020.1739173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Herrera, J., J. Varela-Rivera, and L. Fernandez-Baqueiro. 2016. Out-of-plane design procedure for confined masonry walls. Journal of Structural Engineering 142 (2): 04015126. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NI. 2016. National instruments. http://www.ni.com/.
   Google Scholar
• NP EN206. 2000. Concrete - Specification, performance, production and conformity (Portuguese version).
   Google Scholar
• Palieraki, V., C. Zeris, E. Vintzileou, and C.-E. Adami. 2018. In-plane and out-of plane response of currently constructed masonry infills. Engineering Structures 177: 103–16. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, P., M. Pereira, J. Ferreira, and P. Lourenço. 2012. Behavior of masonry infill panels in RC frames subjected to in plane and out of plane loads. In Presented at the 7th Conference on on Analytical Models and New Concepts in Concrete and Masonry Structure Cracow. Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, S., F. Magalhães, J. P. Gomes, Á. Cunha, and J. V. Lemos. 2018. Dynamic monitoring of a concrete arch dam during the first filling of the reservoir. Engineering Structures 174: 548–60. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, P., M. Di Domenico, and G. M. Verderame. 2018. Experimental investigation of the influence of slenderness ratio and of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction on the out-of-plane strength of URM infill walls. Construction and Building Materials 191: 507–22. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, P., M. Domenico, and G. M. Verderame. 2018. “Experimental assessment of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in unreinforced masonry infill walls. Engineering Structures 173: 960–78. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SVS. 2012. Structural vibration solution - ARTeMIS Extractor Pro. Release 5.3. ed.
   Google Scholar
• Trapani, F. D., P. B. Shing, and L. Cavaleri. 2018. Macroelement model for in-plane and out-of-plane responses of masonry infills in frame structures. Journal of Structural Engineering 144 (2): 04017198. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar