Comparing the Observed and Numerically Simulated Seismic Damage: A Unified Procedure for Unreinforced Masonry and Reinforced Concrete Buildings

References

• Alath, S., and S. K. Kunnath. 1995. Modelling inelastic shear deformations in RC beam–column joints. 10th Conference in Engineering Mechanics, Boulder, Colorado, May 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Angiolilli, M., M. Pathirage, A. Gregori, and G. Cusatis. 2021a. Lattice discrete particle model for the simulation of irregular stone masonry. Journal of Structural Engineering 147 (9): 04021123. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angiolilli, M., S. Lagomarsino, S. Cattari, and S. Degli Abbati. 2021b. Seismic fragility assessment of existing masonry buildings in aggregate. Engineering Structures 247: 113218. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthoine, A., G. Magonette, and G. Magenes. 1995. Shear-compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls. Proceeding 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Aslani, H., and E. Miranda. 2005. Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings. Report No. 157, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Augenti, N., and F. Parisi. 2010. Learning from construction failures due to the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 24 (6): 536–55. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, C., A. Bernardini, R. Colozza, S. Coppari, L. Corazza, M. Della Bella, G. Di Pasquale, M. Dolce, A. Goretti, A. Martinelli, et al. 2007. Field manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short term countermeasures (Pinto A, Taucer F eds), Translation from Italian: Goretti A, Rota M. JRC Scientific and technical reports, EUR 22868 EN-2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bazant, Z. P., and J. Planas. 1997. Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials, Vol. 16. New York: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., E. Brunesi, R. Nascimbene, M. Pagani, and P. Riva. 2015a. Seismic performance of precast industrial facilities following major earthquakes in the Italian territory. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 29 (5). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., M. Torquati, P. Riva, and R. Nascimbene. 2015b. Vulnerability assessment and retrofit solutions of precast industrial structures. Earthquakes and Structures 8 (3): 801–20. doi:10.12989/eas.2015.8.3.801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, K., and A. Dazio. 2012. Quasi-static cyclic tests on masonry spandrels. Earthquake Spectra 28 (3): 907–29. doi:10.1193/1.4000063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosio, M., C. Di Salvatore, D. Bellotti, L. Capacci, A. Belleri, V. Piccolo, F. Cavalieri, B. Dal Lago, P. Riva, and G. Magliulo, et al. 2022. Modelling and seismic response analysis of non-residential single-storey existing precast buildings in Italy. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–22. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2033364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bournas, D. A., P. Negro, and F. F. Taucer. 2014. Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in Northern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (5): 2383–404. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9466-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracchi, S., M. Rota, A. Penna, and G. Magenes. 2015. Consideration of modelling uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by equivalent-frame approach. Bullettin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (11): 3423–48. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9760-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, F., V. Manfredi, A. Masi, A. Salvatori, and M. Vona. 2011. Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (1): 307–24. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9205-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, M. E., D. Bellotti, A. Belleri, F. Cavalieri, P. Riva, and R. Nascimbene. 2021. Influence of modelling assumptions on the seismic risk of industrial precast concrete structures. Frontiers in Built Environment 7: 629956. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.629956.
   Google Scholar
• Brunelli, A., F. De Silva, A. Piro, F. Parisi, S. Sica, F. Silvestri, and S. Cattari. 2021. Numerical simulation of the seismic response and soil–structure interaction for a monitored masonry school building damaged by the 2016 Central Italy earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (2): 1181–211. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00980-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casotto, C., V. Silva, H. Crowley, R. Nascimbene, and R. Pinho. 2015. Seismic fragility of Italian RC precast industrial structures. Engineering Structures 94: 122–36. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellazzi, G., B. Pantò, G. Occhipinti, D. A. Talledo, L. Berto, and G. Camata. 2022. A comparative study on a complex URM building: Part II—issues on modelling and seismic analysis through continuum and discrete-macroelement models. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 20 (4): 2159–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., and S. Lagomarsino. 2009. A strength criterion for the flexural behaviour of spandrel in un-reinforced masonry walls. Proceedings of the 14th WCEE, Beijing, China, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., S. Degli Abbati, D. Ferretti, S. Lagomarsino, D. Ottonelli, and A. M. Tralli. 2012. The seismic behaviour of ancient masonry buildings after the earthquake in Emilia (Italy) on May 20 and 29. Ingegneria Sismica 29 (2–3): 87–119.
   Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., and S. Lagomarsino. 2013a. Analisi non lineari per la simulazione del danno di un fabbricato in San Felice sul Panaro (Emilia, 2012), in italian. Proceedings of XV Convegno ANIDIS “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Padova, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., and S. Lagomarsino. 2013b. In Masonry structures: In developments in the field of displacement-based seismic assessment, ed., T. Sullivan and G. Calvi. IUSS PRESS and EUCENTRE.
   Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., D. Camilletti, S. Lagomarsino, S. Bracchi, M. Rota, and A. Penna. 2018. Masonry Italian code-conforming buildings. Part 2: Nonlinear modelling and time-history analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22 (sup2): 2010–40. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1541030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., and G. Magenes. 2022. Benchmarking the software packages to model and assess the seismic response of unreinforced masonry existing buildings through nonlinear static analyses. Bull Earthquake Eng (2021) 20 (4): 1901–36. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01105-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., M. Angiolilli, S. Alfano, A. Brunelli, and F. De Silva. 2022. Investigating the combined role of the structural vulnerability and site effects on the seismic response of a URM school hit by the Central Italy 2016 earthquake. Structures 40: 386–402. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., and M. Angiolilli. 2022. Multiscale procedure to assign structural damage levels in masonry buildings from observed or numerically simulated seismic performance. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. under review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2008. Modeling beam-column joints in fragility assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12 (3): 357–81. doi:10.1080/13632460701457215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosenza, E., C. Del Vecchio, M. Di Ludovico, M. Dolce, C. Moroni, A. Prota, and E. Renzi. 2018. The Italian guidelines for seismic risk classification of constructions: Technical principles and validation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16: 5905–35. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0431-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croci, G., A. Viskovic, A. Herzalla, M. Erdik, M. Akdoğan, G. de Canio, and L. Antonelli. 2010. Seismic assessment by numerical analyses and shaking table tests for complex masonry structures: The Hagia Irene case study. Advanced Materials Research 133: 777–82. www.scientific.net/AMR.133-134.777.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ayala, D. F., and S. Paganoni. 2011. Assessment and analysis of damage in L’Aquila historic city centre after 6th April 2009. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (1): 81–104. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9224-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Felice, G. 2011. Out-of-plane seismic capacity of masonry depending on wall section morphology. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5 (4–5): 466–82. doi:10.1080/15583058.2010.530339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Risi, M. T., P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2017. Modelling exterior unreinforced beam-column joints in seismic analysis of non-ductile RC frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (6): 899–923. doi:10.1002/eqe.2835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Risi, M. T., M. Di Domenico, P. Ricci, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2019. Experimental investigation on the influence of the aspect ratio on the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction for masonry infills in RC frames. Engineering Structures 189: 523–40. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Risi, M. T., M. Di Domenico, V. Manfredi, M. Terrenzi, G. Camata, F. Mollaioli, F. Noto, P. Ricci, P. Franchin, A. Masi, Spacone, E., and Verderame, G.M. 2022. Modelling and seismic response analysis of pre-code and low-code reinforced concrete buildings in Italy. Part I: Bare frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–32. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2074919.
   Google Scholar
• Decanini, L. D., and G. E. Fantin. 1986. Modelos simplificados de la mampostería incluidas en porticos. Características de rigidez y resistencia lateral en estado límite. Actas de las VI Jornadas Argentinas de Ingenieria Estructural, Buenos Aires, Argentina, October 1–3. (in Spanish)
   Google Scholar
• Decanini, L., De Sortis, A., Goretti, A., Langenbach, R., Mollaioli, F., and Rasulo, A. 2004. Performance of masonry buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 20: 191–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decanini, L. D., L. Liberatore, and F. Mollaioli. 2014. Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 13 (3): 437–54. doi:10.1007/s11803-014-0254-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degli Abbati, S., P. Morandi, S. Cattari, and E. Spacone. 2022. On the reliability of the equivalent frame models: The case study of the permanently monitored Pizzoli’s town hall. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 20 (4): 2187–217. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01145-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gaudio, C., P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2018. A class-oriented mechanical approach for seismic damage assessment of RC buildings subjected to 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16: 4581–605. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0365-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gaudio, C., M. T. De Risi, P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2019. Empirical drift-fragility functions and loss estimation for infills in reinforced concrete frames under seismic loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (3): 1285–330. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0501-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gaudio, C., M. T. De Risi, and G. M. Verderame. 2021. Seismic loss prediction for infilled RC buildings via simplified analytical method. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 1–34. (in press). doi:10.1080/13632469.2021.1875940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demartino, C., I. Vanzi, G. Monti, and C. Sulpizio. 2018. Precast industrial buildings in Southern Europe: Loss of support at frictional beam-to-column connections under seismic actions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (1): 259–94. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0196-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Domenico, M., P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2021a. Empirical calibration of hysteretic parameters for modelling the seismic response of reinforced concrete columns with plain bars. Engineering Structures 237: 112120. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Domenico, M., P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2021b. Floor spectra for bare and infilled reinforced concrete buildings designed according to Eurocodes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 50 (13): 3577–601. doi:10.1002/eqe.3523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Domenico, M., M. T. De Risi, P. Ricci, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2021d. Empirical prediction of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction effects in clay brick unreinforced masonry infill walls. Engineering Structures 227: 111438. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Domenico, M., M. T. De Risi, V. Manfredi, M. Terrenzi, G. Camata, F. Mollaioli, F. Noto, P. Ricci, P. Franchin, A. Masi, Spacone, E., and Verderame, G.M. 2022. Modelling and seismic response analysis of pre-code and low-code reinforced concrete buildings in Italy. Part II: Infilled frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–31. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2086189.
   Google Scholar
• Di Ludovico, M., A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2017a. Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside historical centres after the L’Aquila earthquake: Part I —”light damage” reconstruction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (2): 667–92. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9877-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Ludovico, M., A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2017b. Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside historical centres after the L’Aquila earthquake: Part II —“heavy damage” reconstruction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (2): 693–729. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9979-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. 30/05/1972. 1972. Decreto Ministeriale 30 maggio 1972. Norme tecniche alle quali devono uniformarsi le costruzioni in conglomerato cementizio, normale e precompresso ed a struttura metallica. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 190 del 22 luglio.
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., E. Speranza, F. Giordano, B. Borzi, F. Bocchi, C. Conte, A. Di Meo, M. Faravelli, and V. Pascale. 2019. Observed damage database of past Italian earthquakes: The Da. DO WebGIS. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 60 (2): 141–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DT212. 2013. Technical documentation of the National Research Council (CNR). Guide for the Probabilistic assessment of the seismic safety of existing buildings. https://www.cnr.it/en/node/2643.
   Google Scholar
• Ercolino, M., G. Magliulo, and G. Manfredi. 2016. Failure of a precast RC building due to Emilia-Romagna earthquakes. Engineering Structures 118: 262–73. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, R., F. Messali, G. J. P. Ravenshorst, H. R. Shipper, and J. G. Rots. 2019. Seismic assessment of a lab-tested two-storey unreinforced masonry Dutch terraced house. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17: 4601–23. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00572-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eteme Minkada, M., S. Labò, A. Marini, and A. Belleri. 2021. Preliminary considerations on the loss of support for precast beam elements. COMPDYN 2021, Athens, Greece. 27–30 June.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode 2. 2004. Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode 8. 2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1-1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, L., S. Del Gaudio, C. Smerzini, A. d’Onofrio, G. Festa, I. Iervolino, L. Landolfi, R. Paolucci, A. Santo, and F. Silvestri. 2017. Physics-based seismic input for engineering applications: A case study in the Aterno river valley, Central Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15: 2645–71. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0089-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, A. Arêde, H. Varum, M. Grubišić, and T. K. Šipoš. 2018. Prediction of the earthquake response of a three-storey infilled RC structure. Engineering Structures 171: 214–35. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajera, K., B. Dal Lago, L. Capacci, and F. Biondini. 2021. Multi-Stripe seismic assessment of precast industrial buildings with cladding panels. Frontiers in Built Environment 7: 631360. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.631360.
   Google Scholar
• Graziotti, F., G. Magenes, and A. Penna. 2012. Experimental cyclic behaviour of stone masonry spandrels. Proceeding of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa. PT.
   Google Scholar
• Graziotti, F., G. Guerrini, A. Rossi, G. Andreotti, and G. Magenes. 2018. Proposal for an improved procedure and interpretation of ASTM C1531 for the in situ determination of brick-masonry shear strength. Masonry.
   Google Scholar
• Grünthal, G. 1998. Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie: Volume 15–European Macroseismic Scale 1998. European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, C. B., and G. G. Deierlein. 2005. Benchmarking seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Structures Congress, April 20-24, New York, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, C. B., A. B. Liel, S. Taylor-Lange, and G. G. Deierlein. 2008. Beam-column element model calibrated for predicting flexural response leading to global collapse of RC frame buildings. PEER Report No. 2007/03. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., A. Spillatura, and P. Bazzurro. 2018. Seismic reliability of code-conforming Italian buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22 (sup2): 5–27. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1540372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., R. Baraschino, and A. Spillatura. 2022. Evolution of seismic reliability of code-conforming Italian buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2087801. In press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indirli, M., L. A. S. Kouris, A. Formisano, R. P. Borg, and F. M. Mazzolani. 2013. Seismic damage assessment of unreinforced masonry structures after the Abruzzo 2009 Earthquake: The case study of the historical centers of L’Aquila and Castelvecchio Subequo. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 7 (5): 536–78. doi:10.1080/15583058.2011.654050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajiwara, K., Y. Tosauchi, J.-D. Kang, K. Fukuyama, E. Sato, T. Inoue, T. Kabeyasawa, H. Shiohara, T. Nagae, and T. Kabeyasawa, et al. 2021. Shaking-table tests of a full-scale ten-story reinforced-concrete building (FY2015). Phase I: free-standing system with base sliding and uplifting. Engineering Structures 233: 111848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., A. Penna, A. Galasco, and S. Cattari. 2013. TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Engineering Structures 56: 1787–99. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., S. Cattari, M. Angiolilli, S. Bracchi, M. Rota, and A. Penna. 2022. Modelling and Seismic Response Analysis of Existing URM Structures. Part 2: Archetypes of Italian Historical Buildings. Journal earthquake engineering 1–26. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2087800.
   Google Scholar
• Law n. 1684 25/11/1962. 1962. Gazzetta Ufficiale delLa Repubblica Italiana 22 dicembre 1962, n. 326. (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Liberatore, L., F. Noto, F. Mollaioli, and P. Franchin. 2018. In-plane response of masonry infill walls: Comprehensive experimentally-based equivalent strut model for deterministic and probabilistic analysis. Engineering Structures 167: 533–48. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., J. M. Leite, M. F. Paulo-Pereira, A. Campos-Costa, P. X. Candeias, and N. Mendes. 2016. Shaking table testing for masonry infill walls: Unreinforced versus reinforced solutions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45: 2241–60. doi:10.1002/eqe.2756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., A. Penna, A. Galasco, and M. da Pare´. 2010. In-plane cyclic shear tests of undressed double leaf stone masonry panels. 8th International Masorny Conference, Dresden, Germany, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., A. Penna, I. E. Senaldi, M. Rota, and A. Galasco. 2014. Shaking table test of a strengthened full-scale stone masonry building with flexible diaphragms. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 8 (3): 349–75. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.826299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., M. Ercolino, C. Petrone, O. Coppola, and G. Manfredi. 2014. The Emilia earthquake: Seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra 30 (2): 891–912. doi:10.1193/091012EQS285M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., C. Di Salvatore, and M. Ercolino. 2021. Modeling of the beam-to-column dowel connection for a single-story RC precast building. Frontiers in Built Environment 7: 627546. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.627546.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredi, G., A. Prota, G. M. Verderame, F. De Luca, and P. Ricci. 2014. 2012 Emilia Earthquake, Italy: Reinforced concrete buildings response. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12: 2275–98. 1570-761x. doi:10.1007/S10518-013-9512-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masi, A., L. Chiauzzi, G. Santarsiero, V. Manfredi, S. Biondi, E. Spacone, C. Del Gaudio, P. Ricci, G. Manfredi, and G. M. Verderame. 2019. Seismic response of RC buildings during the Mw6.0 August 24, 2016 Central Italy earthquake: The Amatrice case study. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17: 5631–54. 1570-761x. doi:10.1007/S10518-017-0277-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, F., G. L. Fenves, and M. H. Scott. 2000. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, N., A. A. Costa, P. B. Loureno, R. Bento, K. Beyer, G. de Felice, M. Gams, M. Griffith, J. M. Ingham, S. Lagomarsino, et al. 2017. Methods and approaches for blind test predictions of out of-plane behavior of masonry walls: A numerical comparative study. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 11 (1): 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghini, F., E. Ongaretto, V. Ligabue, M. Savoia, and N. Tullini. 2016. Observational failure analysis of precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Earthquakes and Structures 11 (2): 327–46. doi:10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIT. 2019. Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation, Circ. C.S.Ll.PP. No. 7 of 21/1/2019. Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’aggiornamento delle norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al Decreto Ministeriale 17 Gennaio 2018, Technical Document, in italian.
   Google Scholar
• Morandi, P., C. F. Manzini, and G. Magenes. 2019. Application of seismic design procedures on three modern URM buildings struck by the 2012 Emilia earthquakes: Inconsistencies and improvement proposals in the European codes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18: 547–80. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00650-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastri, E., M. Vergato, and M. Latour. 2017. Performance evaluation of a seismic retrofitted R.C. precast industrial building. Earthquakes and Structures 12: 1. doi:10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh, N. M., L. Liberatore, F. Mollaioli, and S. Tesfamariam. 2017. Modelling of masonry infilled RC frames subjected to cyclic loads: State of the art review and modelling with OpenSees. Engineering Structures 150: 599–621. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTC. 2018. Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Technical Document, in italian.
   Google Scholar
• Ottonelli, D., S. Cattari, and S. Lagomarsino. 2020. Displacement-Based simplified seismic loss assessment of masonry buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 24 (sup1): 23–59. doi:10.1080/13632469.2020.1755747.
   Google Scholar
• Ottonelli, D., C. Marano, C. Manzini, B. Calderoni, and S. Cattari. 2022. A comparative study on a complex URM building. Part I: Sensitivity of the seismic response to different modelling options in the equivalent frame models. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 20 (4): 2115–58. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01128-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanci, M., S. M. Senel, and A. Kalkan. 2017. Assessment of one story existing precast industrial buildings in Turkey based on fragility curves. Bull Earthquake Engineering 15 (1): 271–89. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9956-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisse, F., S. Cattari, R. Marques, P. B. Lourenço, G. Magenes, K. Beyer, B. Calderoni, G. Camata, E. A. Cordasco, M. A. Erberik, et al. 2021. Benchmarking the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings from a blind prediction test. Structures 31: 982–1005. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, A., P. Morandi, M. Rota, C. F. Manzini, F. Da Porto, and G. Magenes. 2014. Performance of masonry buildings during the Emilia 2012 earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (5): 2255–73. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9496-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, A., M. Rota, S. Bracchi, M. Angiolilli, S. Cattari, and S. Lagomarsino. 2022. Modelling and seismic response analysis of existing URM structures. Part 1: archetypes of Italian modern buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2095060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaie, A., M. Godio, and K. Beyer. 2020. Experimental investigation of strength, stiffness and drift capacity of rubble stone masonry walls. Construction and Building Materials 251: 118972. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, P., F. De Luca, and G. M. Verderame. 2011. 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: Reinforced concrete building performance. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (1): 285–305. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9204-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, P., M. Di Domenico, and G. M. Verderame. 2018. Empirical-based out-of-plane URM infill wall model accounting for the interaction with in-plane demand. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (3): 802–27. doi:10.1002/eqe.2992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, P., M. Di Domenico, and G. M. Verderame. 2018b. Experimental assessment of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in unreinforced masonry infill walls. Engineering Structures 173: 960–78. 2018a. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, P., M. Di Domenico, and G. M. Verderame. 2022. Effects of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in URM infills on the seismic performance of RC buildings designed to Eurocodes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 26 (3): 1595–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, B., P. Martinelli, F. Voldoire, T. Chaudat, S. Abouri, and N. Bonfils. 2016. SMART 2008: Overview, synthesis and lessons learned from the International Benchmark. Engineering Structures 106: 166–78. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rota, M., A. Penna, and C. L. Strobbia. 2008. Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28: 933–47. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoia, M., C. Mazzotti, N. Buratti, B. Ferracuti, M. Bovo, and V. Ligabue. 2012. Damages and collapses in industrial precast buildings after the Emilia earthquake. Ingegne Sismi 29: 120–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schoettler, M. J., A. Belleri, Z. Dichuan, J. I. Restrepo, and R. B. Fleischman. 2009. Preliminary results of the shake-table testing for the development of a diaphragm seismic design methodology. PCI Journal 54 (1): 100–24. doi:10.15554/pcij.01012009.100.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaldi, I. E., G. Guerrini, P. Comini, F. Graziotti, A. Penna, K. Beyer, and G. Magenes. 2020. Experimental seismic performance of a half-scale stone masonry building aggregate. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (2): 609–43. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00631-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SERA Project – Seismic Testing of Adjacent Interacting Masonry Structures. 2017. Blind prediction of a shake table test on a masonry building aggregate. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3445391
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, L., S. Cattari, F. Da Porto, G. Magenes, and A. Penna. 2019. Seismic behaviour of ordinary masonry buildings during the 2016 central Italy earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (10): 5583–607. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0370-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, R., N. Batalha, V. Silva, and H. Rodrigues. 2020. Seismic fragility functions for Portuguese RC precast buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-01007-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spina, D., G. Acunzo, N. Fiorini, F. Mori, and M. Dolce. 2019. A probabilistic simplified seismic model of masonry buildings based on ambient vibrations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (2): 985–1007. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0481-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toniolo, G., and A. Colombo. 2012. Precast concrete structures: The lessons learned from the L’Aquila earthquake. Structural Concrete 13 (2): 73–83. doi:10.1002/suco.201100052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnšek, V., and P. Sheppard. 1980. The shear and flexural resistance of masonry walls. Proceedings of the International Research Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Skopje, Japan, 517–73.
   Google Scholar
• Vanin, F., D. Zaganelli, A. Penna, and K. Beyer. 2017. Estimates for the stiffness, strength and drift capacity of stone masonry walls based on 123 quasi-static cyclic tests reported in the literature. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15: 5435–79. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0188-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verderame, G. M., F. De Luca, P. Ricci, and G. Manfredi. 2011. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics. Preliminary Analysis of a soft-storey Mechanism after the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake 40: 925–44. John Wiley & Sons, 0098-8847. doi:10.1002/Eqe.1069.
   Google Scholar
• Verderame, G. M., and P. Ricci. 2018. An empirical approach for nonlinear modelling and deformation capacity assessment of RC columns with plain bars. Engineering Structures 176: 539–54. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, R. S., H. Rodrigues, H. Varum, A. Costa, and J. A. R. Mendes da Silva. 2012. Performance of masonry enclosure walls: Lessons learned from recent earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 11 (1): 23–34. doi:10.1007/s11803-012-0095-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., T. L. Pham, and T. Ding. 2015. Shake table test on seismic response of a precast frame with recycled aggregate concrete. Advances in Structural Engineering 18 (9): 1517–34. doi:10.1260/1369-4332.18.9.1517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeow, T. Z., K. Kusunoki, I. Nakamura, Y. Hibino, T. Ohkubo, T. Seike, S. Yagi, T. Mukai, P. Calvi, M. Moustafa, et al.2020. The 2019 Tokyo metropolitan resilience project E-Defense test of a 3-story disaster management center. Proceedings of the 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 17WCEE. Sendai, Japan, September 13th-18th.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., R. B. Fleischman, M. J. Schoettler, J. I. Restrepo, and M. Mielke. 2019. Precast diaphragm response in half-scale shake table test. Journal of Structural Engineering 145 (5): 04019024. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar