Post-Earthquake Functionality Assessment of Urban Road Network Considering Emergency Response

References

• Adachi, T., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2009. Serviceability assessment of a municipal water system under spatially correlated seismic intensities. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 24 (4): 237–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00583.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Mamun, A., and M. Saatcioglu. 2017. Seismic fragility curves for reinforced concrete frame buildings in Canada designed after 1985. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 44 (7). doi: 10.1139/cjce-2016-0388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alipour, A., and B. Shafei. 2016. Seismic resilience of transportation networks with deteriorating components. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States) 142 (8): 1–12. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyroudis, S., J. Selva, P. Gehl, and K. Pitilakis 2015. Systemic seismic risk assessment of road networks considering interactions with the built environment. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30 (7): 524–40. doi: 10.1111/mice.12136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berche, B., C. Von Ferber, T. Holovatch, and Y. Holovatch. 2009. Resilience of public transport networks against attacks. European Physical Journal B 71 (1): 125–37. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00291-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boakye, J., R. Guidotti, P. Gardoni, and C. Murphy. 2022. The role of transportation infrastructure on the impact of natural hazards on communities. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 219 (June 2021): 108184. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108184.
   Google Scholar
• Bocchini, P., and D. M. Frangopol. 2012. Restoration of bridge networks after an earthquake: Multicriteria intervention optimization. Earthquake Spectra 28 (2): 427–55. doi: 10.1193/1.4000019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2008. NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s. Earthquake Spectra 24 (1): 139–71. doi: 10.1193/1.2857546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L., A. M. Asce, F. Peng, Y. Ouyang, A. M. Asce, A. S. Elnashai, B. F. S. AscesJr, and F. Asce. 2012. Bridge seismic retrofit program planning to maximize postearthquake transportation network capacity. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 18 (June): 75–88. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000082.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, L., A. S. Elnashai, B. F. Spencer, J. Song, and Y. Ouyang (2010). Transportations Systems Modeling and Applications in Earthquake Engineering Transportations Systems Modeling and Applications in Earthquake. In Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Mid-America Earthquake Center Report No. 10–03, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. E., and N. Nojima. 2001. Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: The 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35 (6): 475–94. doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00003-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. E., M. Shinozuka, and J. E. Moore. 2000. Probabilistic earthquake scenarios: Extending risk analysis methodologies to spatially distributed systems. Earthquake Spectra 16 (3): 557–72. doi: 10.1193/1.1586127.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., S. Mangalathu, and J. S. Jeon. 2021. Bridge fragilities to network fragilities in seismic scenarios: An integrated approach. Engineering Structures 237 (March): 112212. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112212.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A., C. Yang, S. Kongsomsaksakul, and M. Lee. 2007. Network-based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 7 (3): 241–56. doi: 10.1007/s11067-006-9012-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., K. Zheng, W. Zhuang, H. Ma, and J. Zhang. 2012. Analytical investigation of bridge seismic vulnerability in Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University 47 (4): 558–66. doi: 10.3969/j.0258-2724.2012.04.004.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Y. J. Lee, S. M. Lee, K. H. Song, and W. Suh. 2021. Analysis of macroscopic traffic network impacted by structural damage to bridges from earthquakes. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 11 (7). doi: 10.3390/app11073226.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, S. S., T. Dillon, M. M. Bilec, and V. Khanna. 2016. A network-based framework for assessing infrastructure resilience: A case study of the London metro system. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 13 (118): 20160113. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J. C., and S. C. Chen. 2016. Optimization of transportation-infrastructure-system protection considering weighted connectivity reliability. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 22 (1): 1–9. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., V. Arcidiacono, and A. M. Reinhorn. 2018. Disaster resilience assessment of building and transportation system. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2469. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1531090.
   Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., C. Renschler, L. Arendt, M. Bruneau, and A. M. Reinhorn 2011. Community resilience index for road network systems. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2011, Leuven, Belgium, July, 370–76.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, H., and J. J. Bommer. 2006. Modelling seismic hazard in earthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposure. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4 (3): 249–73. doi: 10.1007/s10518-006-9009-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E. W. 1959. A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1 (1): 269–71. doi: 10.1007/BF01386390.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2017. Probabilistic assessment of an interdependent healthcare–bridge network system under seismic hazard. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 13 (1): 160–70. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2016.1198399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., D. M. Frangopol, and D. Saydam. 2014. Sustainability of highway bridge networks under seismic hazard. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18 (1): 41–66. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.841600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueñas-osorio, L. A. (2005). Interdependent response of networked systems to natural hazards and intentional disruptions interdependent response of networked systems to natural hazards and intentional disruptions. PhD, Public Policy.December 215. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=Interdependent+Response+of+Networked+Systems+to+Natural+Hazards+and+Intentional+Disruptions&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartech.gatech.edu%2Fjspui%2Fbitstream%2F1853%2F7546%2F1%2Fduenasosorio_le
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2012. Multi-Hazard loss estimation methodology (HAZUS-MH 2.1). Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, K., Q. Li, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2020. Post-earthquake modelling of transportation networks using an agent-based model. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 1–15. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1713170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. W. 1962. Algorithm 97: Shortest path. Communications of the ACM 5 (6): 345. doi: 10.1145/367766.368168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchin, P., A. Lupoi, and P. E. Pinto. 2006. On the role of road networks in reducing human losses after earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10 (2): 195–206. doi: 10.1080/13632460609350593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangopol, D. M., and P. Bocchini. 2012. Bridge network performance, maintenance and optimisation under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 8 (4): 341–56. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2011.563089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardoni, P., K. M. Mosalam, and A. Der Kiureghian. 2003. Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 7 (sup001): 79–106. doi: 10.1080/13632460309350474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovinazzi, S., and A. Nicholson 2010. Transport network reliability in seismic risk analysis and management. 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, June 2014. 933.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, L. A. P. J., and P. J. G. Ribeiro. 2020. Resilience of urban transportation systems: Concept, characteristics, and methods. Journal of Transport Geography 85 (April): 102727. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102727.
   Google Scholar
• Goretti, A., and V. Sarli. 2006. Road network and damaged buildings in urban areas: Short and long-term interaction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4 (2): 159–75. doi: 10.1007/s10518-006-9004-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., P. Gardoni, and Y. Chen. 2017. Network reliability analysis with link and nodal weights and auxiliary nodes. Structural Safety 65: 12–26. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günneç, D., and F. S. Salman. 2011. Assessing the reliability and the expected performance of a network under disaster risk. OR Spectrum 33 (3): 499–523. doi: 10.1007/s00291-011-0250-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, A., Z. Liu, S. Li, and H. Li. 2017. Seismic performance assessment of highway bridge networks considering post-disaster traffic demand of a transportation system in emergency conditions. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 13 (12): 1523–37. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2017.1299770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C. H., and C. M. Feng. 2020. The highway resilience and vulnerability in Taiwan. Transport Policy 87 (July 2018): 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.08.010.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y. 1986. The attenuation relationship of ground motions in North China based on the Tangshan earthquake. China Civil Engineering Journal 19 (3): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.1986.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, R. J., and Y. Fan. 1996. Sample quantiles in statistical packages. American Statistician 50 (4). doi: 10.1080/00031305.1996.10473566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ip, W. H., and D. Wang. 2011. Resilience and friability of transportation networks: Evaluation, analysis and optimization. IEEE Systems Journal 5 (2): 189–98. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2010.2096670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram, N., and J. W. Baker. 2009. Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 38 (15): 1687–708. doi: 10.1002/eqe.922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram, N., and J. W. Baker. 2010. Efficient sampling and data reduction techniques for probabilistic seismic lifeline risk assessment. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 39 (10). doi: 10.1002/eqe.988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenelius, E. 2009. Network structure and travel patterns: Explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability. Journal of Transport Geography 17 (3): 234–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamlou, A., and P. Bocchini. 2016. Sequencing algorithm with multiple-input genetic operators: Application to disaster resilience. Engineering Structures 117: 591–602. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima, K. 2012. Damage of bridges due to the 2011 great East Japan earthquake. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering 12 (December 2014): 4_319–4_338. doi: 10.5610/jaee.12.4_319.
   Google Scholar
• Khademi, N., B. Balaei, M. Shahri, M. Mirzaei, B. Sarrafi, M. Zahabiun, and A. S. Mohaymany. 2015. Transportation network vulnerability analysis for the case of a catastrophic earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 12: 234–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilanitis, I., and A. Sextos. 2019. Integrated seismic risk and resilience assessment of roadway networks in earthquake prone areas. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (1): 181–210. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0457-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurauchi, F., N. Uno, A. Sumalee, and Y. Seto 2009. Network Evaluation Based on Connectivity Vulnerability. Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee 637–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0820-9_31
   Google Scholar
• Latora, V., and M. Marchiori. 2001. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical Review Letters 87 (19). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. G., and A. S. Kiremidjian. 2007. Uncertainty and correlation in seismic risk assessment of transportation systems. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Richmond, California.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., and D. M. Frangopol. 2006. Probability-based bridge network performance evaluation. Journal of Bridge Engineering 11 (5): 633–41. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2006)11:5(633).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., D. M. Frangopol, A. Mondoro, and D. Y. Yang. 2018. Sustainability-informed bridge ranking under scour based on transportation network performance and multiattribute utility. Journal of Bridge Engineering 23 (10): 4018082. doi: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., D. Y. Yang, and D. M. Frangopol. 2020. Network-level risk-based framework for optimal bridge adaptation management considering scour and climate change. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 26 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., C. Zhai, and Y. Dong. 2021. Optimal restoration schedules of transportation network considering resilience. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 17 (8): 1141–54. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1801764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., A. Gupte, and Y. Huang. 2018. A mean-risk mixed integer nonlinear program for transportation network protection. 265: 277–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, J. 1999. Fragility curve development for assessing the seismic vulnerability of highway bridges. Research Progress And, August 1–10. http://www.mceer.buffalo.edu/publications/resaccom/99-SP01/RAfullbook.pdf#page=95
   Google Scholar
• Murachi, Y., M. J. Orikowski, X. Dong, and M. Shinozuka. 2003. Fragility analysis of transportation networks. Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Smart Systems and Nondestructive Evaluation for Civil Infrastructures 5057 (August 2003): 655. doi: 10.1117/12.508501.
   Google Scholar
• Murray-Tuite, P. M., and H. S. Mahmassani. 2004. Methodology for determining vulnerable links in a transportation network. Transportation Research Record 1882 (1): 88–96. doi: 10.3141/1882-11.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 2016. NIST special publication 1190: community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems, volume I. National institute of standards and technology, I, 126. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1190v1
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2011. National earthquake resilience: research, implementation, and outreach. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007. Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States. Earthquake Spectra 23 (3): 615–33. doi: 10.1193/1.2756815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe, A., T. Satoh, T. Furuta, A. Suzuki, and K. Okano. 2008. Generalized network Voronoi diagrams: Concepts, computational methods, and applications. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 22 (9): 965–94. doi: 10.1080/13658810701587891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omer, M., A. Mostashari, and R. Nilchiani. 2013. Assessing resilience in a regional road-based transportation network. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 13 (4): 389–408. doi: 10.1504/IJISE.2013.052605.
   Google Scholar
• Osei-Asamoah, A., and N. E. Lownes 2014. Complex network method of evaluating resilience in surface transportation networks. Transportation Research Record 2467 (2467): 120–28. doi: 10.3141/2467-13.
   Google Scholar
• Rohr, A., P. Priesmeier, K. Tzavella, and A. Fekete. 2020. System criticality of road network areas for emergency management services—spatial assessment using a tessellation approach. Infrastructures 5 (11): 1–29. doi: 10.3390/infrastructures5110099.
   Google Scholar
• Rokneddin, K., J. Ghosh, L. Dueñas-Osorio, and J. E. Padgett. 2013. Bridge retrofit prioritisation for ageing transportation networks subject to seismic hazards. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 9 (10): 1050–66. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2011.654230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuraba, C. S., A. C. Santos, and C. Prins. 2016. Work-troop scheduling for road network accessibility after a major earthquake. Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics 52: 317–24. doi: 10.1016/j.endm.2016.03.042.
   Google Scholar
• San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) (2009). “The Resilient City: Defining what San Francisco Needs from Its Seismic Mitigation Policies.” SPUR Report, SPUR Board of Directors.
   Google Scholar
• Schanack, F., G. Valdebenito, and J. Alvial. 2012. Seismic damage to bridges during the 27 February 2010 magnitude 8.8 Chile earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 28 (1): 301–15. doi: 10.1193/1.3672424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sextos, A., I. Kilanitis, N. Theodoulidis, and G. Mylonakis. 2017. Seismic resilience assessment of the Western. June.
   Google Scholar
• Snelder, M., H. J. van Zuylen, and L. H. Immers. 2012. A framework for robustness analysis of road networks for short term variations in supply. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (5): 828–42. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, J. 2006. Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: An accessibility approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40 (6): 491–506. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns, M., and J. E. Padgett. 2012. Impact of 2008 Hurricane Ike on bridge infrastructure in the Houston/Galveston region. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 26 (4): 441–52. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, G., W. Qi, S. Zhang, T. Sim, X. Liu, R. Sun, L. Sun, and Y. Jin. 2015. An integrated method combining remote sensing data and local knowledge for the large-scale estimation of seismic loss risks to buildings in the context of rapid socioeconomic growth: A case study in Tangshan, China. Remote Sensing 7 (3): 2543–601. doi: 10.3390/rs70302543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. L., D. C. Novak, L. Aultman-Hall, and D. M. Scott. 2010. Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: A link-based capacity-reduction approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44 (5): 323–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tak, H., W. Suh, and Y. Lee. 2019. System-level seismic risk assessment of bridge transportation networks employing probabilistic seismic hazard analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Tamima, U., D. Ph, L. Chouinard, D. Sc, and M. Asce. 2017. Systemic seismic vulnerability of transportation networks and emergency facilities. Journal of Infrastructure Systems (4): 1–14. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantala, M. W., G. J. P. Nordenson, G. Deodatis, and K. Jacob. 2008. Earthquake loss estimation for the New York City metropolitan region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28 (10–11): 812–35. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. A. P., and Susilawati. 2012. Remoteness and accessibility in the vulnerability analysis of regional road networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (5): 761–71. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma-Danila, D., I. Armas, and A. Tiganescu. 2020. Network-risk: An open GIS toolbox for estimating the implications of transportation network damage due to natural hazards, tested for Bucharest, Romania. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 20 (5): 1421–39. doi: 10.5194/nhess-20-1421-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twumasi-Boakye, R., and J. O. Sobanjo. 2018. Resilience of regional transportation networks subjected to hazard-induced bridge damages. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems 144 (10): 1–13. doi: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twumasi-Boakye, R., J. O. Sobanjo, S. K. Inkoom, and E. E. Ozguven. 2018. Senior community resilience with a focus on critical transportation infrastructures: An accessibility-based approach to healthcare. Transportation Research Record 2672 (12): 103–15. doi: 10.1177/0361198118793520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaziri, P., R. Davidson, P. Apivatanagul, and L. Nozick. 2012. Identification of optimization-based probabilistic earthquake scenarios for regional loss estimation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16 (2): 296–315. doi: 10.1080/13632469.2011.597486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and G. Jia. 2020. Efficient sample-based approach for effective seismic risk mitigation of transportation networks transportation networks. doi:10.1080/23789689.2019.1598756.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., and T. Takada. 2005. Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 21 (4): 1137–56. doi: 10.1193/1.2083887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., X. Lu, H. Guan, Y. Tian, and A. Ren. 2016. Simulation of earthquake-induced hazards of falling exterior non-structural components and its application to emergency shelter design. Natural Hazards 80 (2): 935–50. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-2005-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Z. 2010. Seismic performance evaluation of existing buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 30 (1): 36–45. https://doi.org/10.13197/j.eeev.2010.01.014
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Y. C., and P. Gardoni. 2022. Predicting road blockage due to building damage following earthquakes. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 219 (July 2021): 108220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108220
   Google Scholar
• Zanini, M. A., F. Faleschini, P. Zampieri, C. Pellegrino, G. Gecchele, M. Gastaldi, and R. Rossi. 2017. Post-quake urban road network functionality assessment for seismic emergency management in historical centres. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 13 (9): 1117–29. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2016.1244211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., and N. Wang. 2016. Resilience-based risk mitigation for road networks. Structural Safety 62: 57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., N. Wang, and C. Nicholson 2017. Resilience-Based post-disaster recovery strategies for road-bridge networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 13 (11): 1404–13. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2016.1271813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Y. Xu, and X. Wen. 2015. Optimal shortest path set problem in undirected graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 29 (3). doi: 10.1007/s10878-014-9766-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., J. Wang, and H. Yang. 2019. Resilience of transportation systems: Concepts and comprehensive review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20 (12): 4262–76. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar