Duration Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motions on Structural Seismic Responses

References

• Akkar, S., and Ö. Özen. 2005. Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (13): 1551–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Rodríguez, A., and E. Miranda. 2015. Assessment of building behavior under near-fault pulse-like ground motions through simplified models. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 79: 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. 2007. Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (13): 1861–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, A. R., F. L. A. Ribeiro, and L. A. C. Neves. 2017. Influence of earthquake ground-motion duration on damage estimation: Application to steel moment resisting frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46 (1): 27–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belejo, A., A. R. Barbosa, and R. Bento. 2017. Influence of ground motion duration on damage index-based fragility assessment of a plan-asymmetric non-ductile reinforced concrete building. Engineering Structures 151: 682–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijelic, N., T. Lin, and G. G. Deierlein. 2018. Validation of the SCEC Broadband platform simulations for tall building risk assessments considering spectral shape and duration of the ground motion. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47: 2233–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommer, J. J., and A. Martínez-Pereira. 1999. The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. Journal of Journal of Journal of Earthquake Engineering 3 (2): 127–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bommer, J. J., P. J. Stafford, and J. E. Alarcon. 2009. Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration of earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 99 (6): 3217–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A. 2011. Correlation of significant duration with amplitude and cumulative intensity measures and its use in ground motion selection. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15: 809–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A. 2015. Correlation of Arias intensity with amplitude, duration and cumulative intensity measures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 78: 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun, M., J. M. Reynouard, L. Jezequel, and N. Ile. 2004. Damaging potential of low-magnitude near-field earthquakes on low-rise shear walls. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24 (8): 587–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y. N., G. P. Mavroeidis, K. C. Meza-Fajardo, and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2017. Accidental eccentricity in symmetric buildings due to wave passage effects arising from near-fault pulse-like ground motion. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46: 2185–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y. N., K. C. Meza-Fajardo, G. P. Mavroeidis, and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2016. Effects of wave passage on torsional response of symmetric buildings subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 88: 109–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, Y. H. 2005. Incorporating low-cycle fatigue model into duration-dependent inelastic design spectra. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (1): 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandramohan, R., J. W. Baker, and G. G. Deierlein. 2016. Quantifying the influence of ground motion duration on structural collapse capacity using spectrally equivalent records. Earthquake Spectra 32 (2): 927–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Z. W., F. De Luca, and K. Goda. 2019. Near-Fault acceleration pulses and non-acceleration pulses: Effects on the inelastic displacement ratio. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 48 (11): 1256–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Y. H. Liu, B. P. Zhou, and D. X. Yang. 2020. Seismic response analysis of intake tower structure under near-fault ground motions with forward-directivity and fling-step effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 132: 106098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A. 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58 (5): 1583–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (4): 526–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Biasio, M., S. Grange, F. Dufour, F. Allain, and I. Petre-Lazar. 2015. Intensity measures for probabilistic assessment of non-structural components acceleration demand. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (13): 2261–80. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrakopoulos, E. G., and T. S. Paraskeva. 2015. Dimensionless fragility curves for rocking response to near-fault excitations. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (12): 2015–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X. L., and Y. S. Liu. 1992. Influence of strong motion duration on accumulated seismic damage of RC structures. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 12 (3): 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimian, H., F. Jalayer, A. Lucchini, F. Mollaioli, and G. Manfredi. 2015. Preliminary ranking of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (10): 2805–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elenas, A., and K. Meskouris. 2001. Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures. Engineering Structures 23 (6): 698–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, C., Q. M. Zhong, W. Wang, S. L. Hu, and C. X. Qiu. 2018. Peak and residual responses of steel moment-resisting and braced frames under pulse-like near-fault earthquakes. Engineering Structures 177: 579–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobarah, A. 2001. Performance based design in earthquake engineering: State of development. Engineering Structures 23: 878–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giouvanidis, A. I., and E. G. Dimitrakopoulos. 2018. Rocking amplification and strong-motion duration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47: 2094–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, G. Q., D. X. Yang, and Y. H. Liu. 2018. Duration effect of near-fault pulse-like ground motions and identification of most suitable duration measure. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (11): 5095–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., and J. J. Bommer. 2006. A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong-motion duration on structural damage. Earthquake Spectra 22 (3): 827–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkan, E., and S. K. Kunnath. 2006. Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings. Earthquake Spectra 22 (2): 367–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostinakis, K., I. K. Fontara, and A. M. Athanatopoulou. 2018. Scalar structure-specific ground motion intensity measures for assessing the seismic performance of structures: A review. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22 (4): 630–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnath, S. K., and Y. H. Chai. 2004. Cumulative damage-based inelastic cyclic demand spectrum. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 33 (4): 499–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, W. I., C. H. Loh, and S. Wan. 2001. Earthquake responses of RC moment frames subjected to near-fault ground motions. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings 10 (3): 219–29.
   Google Scholar
• Liapopoulou, M., M. A. Bravo-Haro, and A. Y. Elghazouli. 2020. The role of ground motion duration and pulse effects in the collapse of ductile systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 49: 1051–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liossatou, E., and M. N. Fardis. 2016. Near-Fault effects on residual displacements of RC structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45: 1391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., F. Zhang, J. Q. Wang, M. S. Alam, and J. Zhang. 2017. Effects of near-fault motions and artificial pulse-type ground motions on super-span cable-stayed bridge systems. Journal of Bridge Engineering 22 (3): 04016128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luco, N., and C. A. Cornell. 2007. Structure-Specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 23: 357–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupoi, G., A. Lupoi, and P. E. Pinto. 2002. Seismic risk assessment of RC structures with the “2000 SAC/FEMA” method. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 6: 499–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Málaga-Chuquitaype, C. 2021. Strong‐motion duration and response scaling of yielding and degrading eccentric structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 50 (2): 635–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, P. K. 2002. Cyclic-Demand spectrum. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31 (7): 1441–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marafi, N. A., J. W. Berman, and M. O. Eberhard. 2016. Ductility-Dependent intensity measure that accounts for ground-motion spectral shape and duration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45 (4): 653–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashayekhi, M., M. Harati, A. Darzi, and H. E. Estekanchi. 2020. Incorporation of strong motion duration in incremental-based seismic assessments. Engineering Structures 223: 111144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavroeidis, G. P., G. Dong, and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2004. Near-Fault ground motions and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 33 (9): 1023–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavroeidis, G. P., and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2003. A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93 (3): 1099–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, F., H. Zhang, A. Bockstedte, G. C. Foliente, and P. Paevere. 2004. Parameter analysis of the differential model of hysteresis. Journal of Applied Mechanics 71 (3): 342–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza, F., and R. Labernarda. 2017. Structural and non-structural intensity measures for the assessment of base-isolated structures subjected to pulse-like near-fault earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 96: 115–27. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, M. W., and H. C. Shah. 1979. Determining strong-motion duration of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 69: 1253–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molazadeh, M., and H. Saffari. 2018. The effects of ground motion duration and pinching-degrading behavior on seismic response of SDOF systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 114: 333–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. E., B. G. Nielson, and R. Desroches. 2008. Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (5): 711–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell, R. 2007. On ground motion intensity indices. Earthquake Spectra 23 (1): 147–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell, R., and J. E. Garcia. 2001. Hysteretic energy spectrum and damage control. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 30 (12): 1791–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahi, S. K., and J. W. Baker. 2014. An efcient algorithm to identify strong-velocity pulses in multicomponent ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 104 (5): 2456–66. doi: 10.1785/0120130191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, P. G., N. F. Smith, R. W. Graves, and N. A. Abrahamson. 1997. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters 68 (1): 199–222.
   Google Scholar
• Teran-Gilmore, A., and N. Bahena-Arredondo. 2008. Cumulative ductility spectra for seismic design of ductile structures subjected to long duration motions: Concept and theoretical background. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12: 152–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M. D., and A. G. Brady. 1975. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65 (3): 581–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., A. Shafieezadeh, and A. Ye. 2018. Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading ground. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16: 229–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G. H., Y. X. Wang, W. B. Lu, P. Yan, W. Zhou, and M. Chen. 2016. A general definition of integrated strong motion duration and its effect on seismic demands of concrete gravity dams. Engineering Structures 125: 481–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D. C., and X. G. Ye. 2010. Index selection of strong motion duration for energy analysis. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting 32 (6): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G. H., S. R. Zhang, C. B. Zhou, and W. B. Lu. 2015. Correlation between strong motion durations and damage measures of concrete gravity dams. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 69: 148–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. M., and X. Zhu. 2006. Correlation study between ground motion intensity measure parameters and deformation demands for bilinear SDOF systems. Acta Seismologica Sinica 28 (1): 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., and S. Makaremi. 2017. Development of duration-dependent damage-based inelastic response spectra. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46: 771–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D. X., J. W. Pan, and G. Li. 2009. Non-Structure-Specific intensity measure parameters and characteristic period of near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 38 (11): 1257–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D. X., and J. L. Zhou. 2015. A stochastic model and synthesis for near-fault impulsive ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44 (2): 243–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zengin, E., and A. E. Abrahamson. 2020. A vector-valued intensity measure for near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 49 (7): 716–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, C. H., and L. L. Xie. 2007. A new approach of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design: The most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (8): 1009–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. Y., L. J. Zhang, H. J. Wang, and C. N. Guan. 2018. Influences of the duration and frequency content of ground motions on the seismic performance of high-rise intake towers. Engineering Failure Analysis 91: 481–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, J., J. S. Jeon, Y. H. Shao, and L. Chen. 2019. Optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of cable-stayed bridges subjected to pulse-like ground motions. Journal of Bridge Engineering 24 (2): 04018118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar