Seismic Risk and Finite Element Modelling Influence of an Existing One-Storey Precast Industrial Building

References

• Belleri, A. 2017. Displacement based design for precast concrete frames with not-emulative connections. Engineering Structures 141:228–40. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., F. Cornali, C. Passoni, A. Marini, and P. Riva. 2017. Evaluation of out-of-plane seismic performance of column-to-column precast concrete cladding panels in one-storey industrial buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (2):397–417. doi:10.1002/eqe.2956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., F. Cornali, C. Passoni, A. Marini, and P. Riva. 2018. Evaluation of out-of-plane seismic performance of column-to-column precast concrete cladding panels in one-storey industrial buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47:397–417. doi:10.1002/eqe.2956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., and S. Labò. 2021. Displacement-based design of precast hinged portal frames with additional dissipating devices at beam-to-column joints. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (12):5161–90. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01169-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., and P. Riva. 2012. Seismic performance and retrofit of precast concrete grouted sleeve connections. PCI Journal 57 (1):97–109. doi:10.15554/pcij.01012012.97.109.
   Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., M. Torquati, A. Marini, and P. Riva. 2016. Horizontal cladding panels: In-plane seismic performance in precast concrete Buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14:1103–29. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9861-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleri, A., M. Torquati, P. Riva, and R. Nascimbene. 2015. Vulnerability assessment and retrofit solutions of precast industrial structures. Earthquakes and Structures 8 (3):801–20. doi:10.12989/eas.2015.8.3.801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biondini, F., and G. Toniolo. 2009. Probabilistic calibration and experimental validation of the seismic design criteria for one-storey concrete frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 13 (4):426–62. doi:10.1080/13632460802598610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biondini, F., G. Toniolo, and G. Tsionis. 2010. Capacity design and seismic performance of multi-story precast structures. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 14 (1):11–28. doi:10.1080/19648189.2010.9693198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosio, M., A. Belleri, P. Riva, and A. Marini. 2020. Displacement-based simplified seismic loss assessment of Italian precast buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 24 (sup1):60–81. doi:10.1080/13632469.2020.1724215.
   Google Scholar
• Bosio, M., C. Di Salvatore, D. Bellotti, L. Capacci, A. Belleri, V. Piccolo, F. Cavalieri, B. Dal Lago, P. Riva, G. Magliulo, et al. 2022. Modelling and seismic response analysis of non-residential single-storey existing precast buildings in Italy. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2033364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bournas, D. A., P. Negro, and F. F. Taucer. 2014. Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in North-ern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (5):2383–404. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9466-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, M. E., A. Belleri, P. Riva, G. Magliulo, D. Bellotti, and B. Dal Lago. 2019. Effects of modeling assumptions on the evaluation of the local seismic response for RC precast industrial buildings. In 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering–COMPDYN, Crete, Greece (pp. 24–26).
   Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, M. E., D. Bellotti, A. Belleri, F. Cavalieri, P. Riva, and R. Nascimbene. 2021. Influence of modelling assumptions on the seismic risk of industrial precast concrete structures. Frontiers in Built Environment 7:629956. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.629956.
   Google Scholar
• Casotto, C., V. Silva, H. Crowley, R. Nascimbene, and R. Pinho. 2015. Seismic fragility of Italian RC precast industrial structures. Engineering Structures 94:122–36. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Clementi, F., A. Scalbi, and S. Lenci. 2016. Seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings with dowel pin connections. Journal of Building Engineering 7:224–38. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2016.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNR 10025. 1984. Prefabbricazione e strutture prefabbricate. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche 10025. in Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, A., P. Negro, G. Toniolo, and M. Lamperti. 2016. Design guidelines for precast structures with cladding panels. JRC Technical report, 978-92-79-58534-0.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Lago, B., G. Toniolo, R. Felicetti, and M. Lamperti Tornaghi. 2017. End support connection of precast roof elements by bolted steel angles. Structural Concrete 18 (5):755–67. doi:10.1002/suco.201600218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Lago, B., G. Toniolo, and M. Lamperti Tornaghi. 2016. Influence of different mechanical column-foundation connection devices on the seismic behaviour of precast structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14 (12):3485–508. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-0010-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demartino, C., I. Vanzi, G. Monti, and C. Sulpizio. 2018. Precast industrial buildings in Southern Europe: Loss of support at frictional beam-to-column connections under seismic actions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (1):259–94. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0196-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefani, L., and R. Scotta. 2022. Seismic behavior of precast buildings with dissipative connections. advances in seismic performance and risk estimation of precast concrete buildings. Frontiers in Built Environment 7. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.639777.
   Google Scholar
• DM 108. 1986. Decreto Ministeriale 108 - Norme tecniche relative alle costruzioni antisismiche. In Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Ercolino, M., G. Magliulo, and G. Manfredi. 2016. Failure of a precast RC building due to Emilia-Romagna earthquakes. Engineering Structures 118:262–73. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA P-58-3.1. 2016. Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 3—Performance 567 Assessment Calculation Tool (PACT) Version 2.9.65. Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gajera, K., B. Dal Lago, L. Capacci, and F. Biondini. 2021. Multi-stripe seismic assessment of precast industrial buildings with cladding panels. Frontiers in Built Environment 7:631360. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.631360.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, L., R. Medina, and H. Krawinkler. 2005. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34:1489–511. doi:10.1002/eqe.495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., R. Baraschino, and A. Spillatura. 2022. Evolution of seismic reliability of code-conforming Italian buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2087801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iervolino, I., A. Spillatura, and P. Bazzurro. 2018. Seismic reliability of code-conforming Italian buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22 (sup2):5–27. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1540372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremmyda, G. D., Y. M. Fahjan, and S. G. Tsoukantas. 2014. Nonlinear FE analysis of precast RC pinned beam-to-column connections under monotonic and cyclic shear loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12:1615–38. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9560-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labò, S., E. Casprini, C. Passoni, J. Zanni, A. Belleri, A. Marini, P. Riva. 2018. Application of low-invasive techniques and incremental seismic rehabilitation to increase the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of seismic interventions. Procedia Structural Integrity, 11:185–93. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.025.
   Google Scholar
• Labò, S., M. Eteme, A. Marini, and A. Belleri. 2022. Loss of support assessment for precast portal frames with friction connections and masonry infills. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 20 (15):7983–8009. doi:10.1007/s10518-022-01489-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., D. Bellotti, M. Cimmino, and R. Nascimbene. 2018. Modeling and seismic response analysis of RC precast Italian code-conforming buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 22 (sup2):140–67. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1531093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., V. Capozzi, G. Fabbrocino, and G. Manfredi. 2011. Neoprene–concrete friction relationships for seismic assessment of existing precast buildings. Engineering Structures 33:532–38. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., C. Di Salvatore, and M. Ercolino. 2021. Modeling of the beam-to-column dowel connection for a single-story RC precast building. Frontiers in Built Environment 7:627546. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.627546.
   Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., M. Ercolino, M. Cimmino, V. Capozzi, and G. Manfredi. 2014a. FEM analysis of the strength of RC beam-to-column dowel connections under monotonic actions. Construction and Building Materials 69:271–284. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliulo, G., M. Ercolino, C. Petrone, O. Coppola, and G. Manfredi. 2014b. The Emilia earthquake: Seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra 30 (2):891–912. doi:10.1193/091012EQS285M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, F., and G. Fenves. 2001. The OpenSees Command Language Manual: Version 1.2- Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center. Berkeley: Univ. of Calif.
   Google Scholar
• Menichini, G., E. Del Monte, M. Orlando, and A. Vignoli. 2020. Out-of-plane capacity of cladding panel-to-structure connections in one-story R/C precast structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18:6849–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metelli, G., C. Beschi, and P. Riva. 2011. Cyclic behaviour of a column to foundation joint for concrete precast structures. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 15 (9):1297–1318. doi:10.1080/19648189.2011.9714856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghini, F., E. Ongaretto, V. Ligabue, M. Savoia, and N. Tullini. 2016. Observational failure analysis of precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Earthquakes and Structures 11 (2):327–46. doi:10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastri, E., M. Vergato, and M. Latour. 2017. Performance evaluation of a seismic retrofitted R.C. precast industrial building. Earthquakes and Structures 12 (1). doi:10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osanai, Y., F. Watanabe, and S. Okamoto. 1996. Stress transfer mechanism of socket base connections with precast concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal 93 (3):266–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanci, M., S. M. Senel, and A. Kalkan. 2017. Assessment of one story existing precast industrial buildings in Turkey based on fragility curves. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (1):271–89. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9956-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poiani, M., V. Gazzani, F. Clementi, and S. Lenci. 2020. Aftershock fragility assessment of Italian cast–in–place RC industrial structures with precast vaults. Journal of Building Engineering 29 (101206). doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101206.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, H., H. Vitorino, N. Batalha, R. Sousa, P. Fernandes, and H. Varum. 2021. Influence of beam-to-column connections in the seismic performance of precast concrete industrial facilities. Structural Engineering International 32 (4):507–19. doi:10.1080/10168664.2021.1920082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoia, M., C. Mazzotti, N. Buratti, B. Ferracuti, M. Bovo, and V. Ligabue. 2012. Damages and collapses in industrial precast buildings after the Emilia earthquake. Ingegneria Sismica 29:120–31.
   Google Scholar
• Scotta, R., L. De Stefani, and R. Vitaliani. 2015. Passive control of precast building response using cladding panels as dissipative shear walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:3527–52. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9763-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, R., N. Batalha, V. Silva, and H. Rodrigues. 2020. Seismic fragility functions for Portuguese RC precast buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (15):6573–90. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-01007-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toniolo, G., and A. Colombo. 2012. Precast concrete structures: The lessons learned from the L’Aquila earthquake. Structural Concrete 13 (2):73–83. doi:10.1002/suco.201100052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torquati, M., A. Belleri, and P. Riva. 2018. Displacement-Based Seismic Assessment for Precast Concrete Frames with Non-Emulative Connections. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 24 (10):1624–51. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1475311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoubek, B., Y. Fahjan, M. Fischinger, and T. Isakovic. 2014. Nonlinear finite element modelling of centric dowel connections in precast buildings. Computers and Concrete 14 (4):463–77. doi:10.12989/cac.2014.14.4.463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoubek, B., M. Fischinger, and T. Isakovic. 2015. Estimation of the cyclic capacity of beam-to-column dowel connections in precast industrial buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (7):2145–68. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9711-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoubek, B., M. Fischinger, and T. Isakovic. 2016. Cyclic response of hammer-head strap cladding-to-structure connections used in RC precast building. Engineering Structures 119:135–48. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar