151
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

PSHA-Based Design Spectrum: An Application of the Design Spectrum Predictive Model for Seismic Regulation Purposes

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 4494-4511 | Received 02 Aug 2022, Accepted 16 Jan 2023, Published online: 09 Feb 2023

References

  • Abarca, A., R. Monteiro, G. O’Reilly, E. Zuccolo, and B. Borzi. 2021. Evaluation of intensity measure performance in regional seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete bridge inventories. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 1–19. doi:10.1080/15732479.2021.1979599.
  • Akkar, S., and J. J. Bommer. 2010. Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East. Seismological Research Letters 81 (2):195–206. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.2.195.
  • Akkar, S. D., J. Douglas, C. Di Alessandro, Campbell, K., Somerville, P., Cotton, F., Silva, W. and Baker, J. 2012. Defining a consistent strategy to model ground motion parameters for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project. 10p.
  • Akkar, S., M. A. Sandıkkaya, and J. J. Bommer. 2014. Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (1):359–87. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9461-4.
  • Andreotti, G., and G. M. Calvi. 2021. Nonlinear soil effects on observed and simulated response spectra. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 50 (14):3831–54. doi:10.1002/eqe.3535.
  • Andreotti, G., A. Famà, and C. G. Lai. 2018. Hazard-dependent soil factors for site-specific elastic acceleration response spectra of Italian and European seismic building codes. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0422-9.
  • Bindi, D., M. Massa, L. Luzi, G. Ameri, F. Pacor, R. Puglia, and P. Augliera. 2014. Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (1):391–430. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9525-5.
  • Boore, D. M. 2010. Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 100 (4):1830–35. doi:10.1785/0120090400.
  • Budnitz, R. J., G. Apostolakis, and D. M. Boore. 1997. Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis : Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts. NUREG/CR-6372, UCRL-ID- 122160. Power 1:998–1006.
  • Calvi, G. M. 2018. Revisiting design earthquake spectra. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (13):2627–43. doi:10.1002/eqe.3101.
  • Calvi, G. M., and G. Andreotti. 2019. Effects of local soil, magnitude and distance on empirical response spectra for design. Journal Earthquake Engineering 00:1–28. doi:10.1080/13632469.2019.1703847.
  • Calvi, G. M., D. Rodrigues, and V. Silva. 2018. Introducing new design spectra derived from Italian recorded ground motions 1972 to 2017. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (13):2644–60. doi:10.1002/eqe.3102.
  • Cauzzi, C., E. Faccioli, M. Vanini, and A. Bianchini. 2015. Updated predictive equations for broadband (0.01–10 s) horizontal response spectra and peak ground motions, based on a global dataset of digital acceleration records. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (6):1587–612. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9685-y.
  • CEN. 2004. EuroCode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance — Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Bruxelles: European Committee for Standardization.
  • Cornell, C. A. 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58 (5):1583–606. doi:10.1785/BSSA0580051583.
  • Danciu, L., S. Nandan, C. Reyes, Basili, R., Weatherill, G., Beauval, C., Rovida, A., Vilanova, S., Sesetyan, K., Bard, P. Y. and Cotton, F. 2021. The 2020 update of the European Seismic Hazard Model - ESHM20: Model Overview. EFEHR Technical Report 001, v1.0.0. doi:10.12686/a15.
  • Douglas, J. 2003. Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: A review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth-Science Reviews 61 (1–2):43–104. doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00112-5.
  • Douglas, J., and B. Edwards. 2016. Recent and future developments in earthquake ground motion estimation. Earth-Science Reviews 160:203–19. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.07.005.
  • Fugro Consultants Inc. 2015. EZ-FRISK 8.06 Software. https://ez-frisk.org/.
  • Giardini, D., J. Woessner, and L. Danciu. 2014. Mapping Europe ’ s Seismic Hazard. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 95 (29):261–62. doi:10.1002/2014EO290001.
  • Lanzano, G., L. Luzi, V. D’Amico, F. Pacor, C. Meletti, W. Marzocchi, R. Rotondi, and E. Varini. 2020. Ground motion models for the new seismic hazard model of Italy (MPS19): Selection for active shallow crustal regions and subduction zones. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (8):3487–516. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00850-y.
  • Luzi, L., R. Puglia, E. Russo, M. D’Amico, C. Felicetta, F. Pacor, G. Lanzano, U. Çeken, J. Clinton, G. Costa, et al. 2016. The engineering strong-motion database: A platform to access pan-European accelerometric data. Seismological Research Letters 87 (4):987–97. doi:10.1785/0220150278.
  • Meletti, C., V. D’Amico, G. Ameri, A. Rovida, and M. Stucchi. 2012. Seismic hazard in the po plain and the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Annals of Geophysics 55 (4):623–29. doi:10.4401/ag-6158.
  • Meletti, C., A. Rovida, V. D. Amico, and M. Stucchi. 2014. Modelli di pericolosità sismica per l ’ area italiana : “MPS04-S1” e “SHARE” Seismic hazard models for the Italian area : “MPS04-S1” and “SHARE. Progrettazione Sismica 5:15–25. doi:10.7414/PS.5.1.15-25.
  • Mori, F., A. Mendicelli, M. Moscatelli, G. Romagnoli, E. Peronace, and G. Naso. 2020. A new Vs30 map for Italy based on the seismic microzonation dataset. Engineering Geology 275:105745. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105745.
  • MPS Working Group. 2004. Redazione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall’Ordinanza PCM 3274 del 20 mazrzo 2003. Rapp conclusivo per Dip della Prot Civile, April 2004, Ist Naz di Geofis e Vulcanol (INGV). Milano-Roma, Italy, Accessed April 2019. http://zonesismiche.mi.ingv.it/ 65 pp. + 5 appendices
  • NTC18. 2018. D.M. 17.01.2018 “Aggiornamento delle «Norme tecniche per le costruzioni»”. G.U. 20.02.2018 n.42
  • NZS. 2004. 1170.5:2004 Structural design actions, Part 5: Earthquake actions – New Zealand. Stand New Zealand, Wellington, NZ
  • Ordaz, M., F. Martinelli, A. Aguilar, Arboleda, J., Meletti, C. and D’Amico, V. 2017. R-CRISIS. Program and platform for computing seismic hazard.
  • Pagani, M., D. Monelli, G. Weatherill, L. Danciu, H. Crowley, V. Silva, P. Henshaw, L. Butler, M. Nastasi, L. Panzeri, et al. 2014. Open quake engine: An open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismological Research Letters 85 (3):692–702. doi:10.1785/0220130087.
  • Rossetto, T., N. Peiris, J. E. Alarcon, E. So, S. Sargeant, M. Free, V. Sword-Daniels, D. Del Re, C. Libberton, E. Verrucci, et al. 2011. Field observations from the Aquila, Italy earthquake of April 6, 2009. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (1):11–37. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9221-7.
  • Smerzini, C., C. Galasso, I. Iervolino, and R. Paolucci. 2014. Ground motion record selection based on broadband spectral compatibility. Earthquake Spectra 30 (4):1427–48. doi:10.1193/052312EQS197M.
  • Woessner, J., D. Laurentiu, D. Giardini, H. Crowley, F. Cotton, G. Grünthal, G. Valensise, R. Arvidsson, R. Basili, M. B. Demircioglu, et al. 2015. The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: Key components and results. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (12):3553–96. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9795-1.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.