25,313
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The new special educational needs (SEN) legislation in England and implications for services for children and young people with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties

&

References

  • Audit Commission. 2002. Statutory Assessment and Statements of SEN: In Need of Review? Policy Focus. Wetherby: Audit Commission Publications.
  • Black, A., and B. Norwich. 2013. Initial Analysis of Pathfinder Replies to IPSEA Questionnaire. Unpublished Report for IPSEA (available from authors).
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cartwright, N. 2007. “Are RCTs the Gold Standard?” Bioscience 2: 11–20.
  • Children and Families Act. 2014. “Council for Disabled Children.” http://www.councilfordisabledchildren.org.uk/resources/cdcs-resources/health-briefing-on-the-children-and-families-act-2014
  • Conservative Party. 2010. “Commission on Special Needs in Education; the Second Report.” Accessed November 5, 2014. http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/files/special_needs_in_education.pdf
  • Cooper, P., and B. Jacobs. 2011. From Inclusion to Engagement: Helping Students Engage with Schooling Through Policy and Practice. London: Wiley.
  • Corrigan, E. 2014. “Person Centred Planning ‘In Action’: Exploring the Use of Person Centred Planning in Supporting Young People’s Transition and Re-Integration to Mainstream Education.” British Journal of Special Education 41 (3): 268–288. doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12069.
  • Craston, M., G. Thom, and R. Spivack. 2013. Evaluation of SEND Pathfinder Programme: Processes and Implementation. London: SQW, DFE RR295.
  • DFE. 2011. Support and Aspiration: A New Approach to Special Educational Needs. London: DFE.
  • DFE. 2014. SEN and Disability Code of Practice: Statutory Guidance for Organisations Who Work with and Support Children and Young People with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities. London: DFE.
  • DfES. 2006. The Common Assessment Framework for Children and Young People: Practitioners’ Guide. Nottingham: DfES.
  • Eaton, A. 2010. “The Role of the Educational Psychologist in Promoting Effective Multi-Agency Collaborations.” DEdPsych thesis, University of Exeter. Accessed November 5, 2014. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10036/110333/EatonA.pdf?sequence=2 30.07.14
  • Falvey, M. A., M. Forest, J. Pearpoint, and R. L. Rosenberg. 2003. All My Life’s a Circle. Toronto: Inclusion Press.
  • Frederickson, N., and T. Cline, eds. 1995. Assessing the Learning Environments of Children with Special Educational Needs. London: Educational Psychology Publishing.
  • Gray, P., and B. Norwich. 2014. “An Overview of Issues Emerging as the Policy Context Changes. The Coalition Government’s Policy on SEN: Aspirations and Challenges.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 14 (2): 122–127. doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12027_3.
  • Hollenweger, J. 2011. “Development of an ICF-Based Eligibility Procedure for Education in Switzerland.” BMC Public Health 11 (4): S7–8. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S7.
  • House of Commons. 2006. Special Educational Needs. Education Select Committee Report, House of Commons.
  • Lamb, B. 2013. Accountability the Local Offer and SEND Reform: A Cultural Revolution? In How Will Accountability Work in the New SEND Legislative System? SEN Policy Research Forum. Accessed November 5, 2014. http://www.sen-policyforum.org.uk/page.php?id=171
  • Lamb Enquiry. 2009. SEN and Parental Confidence. Nottingham: DCSF.
  • Mount, B., and K. Zwernik. 1988. It’s Never Too Early, It’s Never Too Late: A Booklet about Personal Futures Planning for Persons with Developmental Disabilities, Their Families and Friends, Case Managers, Service Providers and Advocates. Minneapolis, MN: Metropolitan Council.
  • Norwich, B. Forthcoming. “Changing Policy and Legislation and Its Radical Effects on Inclusive and Special Education in England.” British Journal of Special Education.
  • Ofsted. 2010. The Special Educational Needs and Disability Review. Reference 090221. London: Ofsted.
  • Ofsted. 2014. The Framework for Inspecting Schools in England under Section 5 of the Education Act 2005 (As Amended). Reference 120100. Manchester: Ofsted.
  • Rost, J. C. 1997. “Moving from Individual to Relationship: A Postindustrial Paradigm of Leadership.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 4 (4): 3–16. doi:10.1177/107179199700400402.
  • Sanderson, H., T. Smith, and L. Wilson. 2010. One Page Profiles in Schools: A Guide. Stockport: HSA Press.
  • Sanderson, H., J. Thompson, and J. Kilbane. 2006. “The Emergence of Person-Centred Planning as Evidence-Based Practice.” Journal of Integrated Care 14 (2): 18–25. doi:10.1108/147690182006000014.
  • SEC. 2013. “Analysis of Changes between the Draft Provisions and Children and Families Bill.” Accessed November 5, 2014. http://www.councilfordisabledchildren.org.uk/what-we-do/special-educational-consortium/read-our-latest-news-stories/2013/analysis-of-changes-between-the-draft-provisions-and-children-and-families-bill
  • Smull, M. W., and H. Sanderson. 2005. Essential Lifestyle Planning for Everyone. Annapolis, MD: The Learning Community.
  • Tondora, J., R. Miller, and L. Davidson. 2012. “The Top Ten Concerns about Person-Centered Care Planning in Mental Health Systems.” The International Journal of Person Centered Medicine 2 (3): 410–420.
  • Townsley, R., D. Abbott, and D. Watson. 2004. Making a Difference? Exploring the Impact of Multi-Agency Working on Disabled Children with Complex Health Care Needs, Their Families and the Professionals Who Support Them. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Warnock, M., and B. Norwich. 2010. Special Educational Needs: A New Look. Edited by L. Terzi. London: Continuum Publishers.
  • Wedell, K. 1981. “Concepts of Special Educational Needs.” Education Today 31 (1): 39–48.
  • Wolpert, M., N. Humphrey, J. Belsky, and J. Deighton. 2013. “Embedding Mental Health Support in Schools: Learning from the Targeted Mental Health in Schools (TaMHS) National Evaluation.” Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 18 (3): 270–283. doi:10.1080/13632752.2013.819253.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.