A performance profile of learner completion and retention in Australian VET MOOCs

References

• Avenell, P. 2016. “Open Universities Points Finger at Rivals as It Closes VET Business”. In Campus Review, 27. Sydney: Educational Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, A. 2015. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. Vancouver, BC: Tony Bates Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, J., A. Ho, G. Stump, and L. Breslow. 2014. “Changing ‘Course’ Reconceptualizing Educational Variables for Massive Open Online Courses.” Educational Researcher 43 (2): 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flexible Learning Advisory Group. 2013. “MOOCs and VET: Working Report.” In MOOCs and VET: Applying the MOOCs Model to Vocational Education and Training in Australia, edited by VOCED Plus, 1–15. Brisbane: FLAG.
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, S., J. Morgan, and D. Gibson. 2015. “Will MOOCs Transform Learning and Teaching in Higher Education? Engagement and Course Retention in Online Learning Provision.” British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (3): 455–471.10.1111/bjet.2015.46.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J., C. Oswald, and J. Pomerantz. 2015. “Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course.” American Educational Research Journal 52 (5): 925–955.10.3102/0002831215584621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P., and K. Reinecke. 2014. Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. 2014. “Promoting Engagement in Online Courses: What Strategies Can We Learn from Three Highly Rated MOOCs.” British Journal of Educational Technology 47 (2): 320–341. doi:10.1111/bjet.12235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A., I. Chuang, J. Reich, C. Coleman, J. Whitehill, C. Northcutt, J. Williams, J. Hansen, G. Lopez, and R. Petersen. 2015. HarvardX and MITx: Two years of open online courses fall 2012-Summer 2014. SSRN Electronic Journal 10: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. 2014. “Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 15 (1): 133–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. 2015. “Massive Open Online Course Completion Rates Revisited: Assessment, Length and Attrition.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 16 (3): 341–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevat, P. 2014. “Research Report: Cohorts 1 to 12 September 2014.” In Open2Study Research Report, 1–132. Open Universities Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, H., and M. Ebner. 2013. Interaction Possibilities in MOOCs – How Do They Actually Happen. Paper presented at the International Conference on Higher Education Development, Mansoura, Mansoura University.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, H., and M. Ebner. 2014. MOOCs Completion Rates and Possible Methods to Improve Retention - a Literature Review. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, S., and C. Lowe. 2014. “Invasion of the MOOCs: The Promise and Perils of Massive Open Online Courses.” Parlor Press. http://www.parlorpress.com/pdf/invasion_of_the_moocs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maringe, F., and N. Sing. 2014. “Teaching Large Classes in an Increasingly Internationalising Higher Education Environment: Pedagogical, Quality and Equity Issues.” Higher Education 67 (6): 761–782.10.1007/s10734-013-9710-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J, A Williams, and A Lennox. 2013. MOOCs in Vocational Education and Training and Higher Education. Paper presented at the 22nd National Vocational Education and Training Research Conference ‘No Frills’, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Pilli, Olga, and Wilfried Admiraal. 2017. “Students’ Learning Outcomes in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Some Suggestions for Course Design.” Journal of Higher Education 7 (1): 46–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, L., and D. Chunrao. 2016. “Influencing Factors of Success and Failure in MOOC and General Analysis of Learner Behavior.” International Journal of Information and Education Technology 6 (4): 262.10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.697
   Google Scholar
• Rosewell, J., and D. Jansen. 2014. “The OpenupEd Quality Label: Benchmarks for MOOCs.” The International Journal for Innovation and Quality Learning 2014: 88–100.
   Google Scholar
• Skrpnyk, O, P de Vries, and T Hennis. 2015. “Reconsidering Retention in MOOCs: The Relevance of Formal Assessment and Pedagogy.” In EMOOCs 2015, 166–172. Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Spyropoulou, N., C. Pierrakeas, and A. Kameas. 2014. Creating MOOC Guidelines Based on Best Practices. Paper presented at the Proc. of the 6th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Edulearn14).
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M. 2016. “The Discretised Lognormal and Hooked Power Law Distributions for Complete Citation Data: Best Options for Modelling and Regression.” Journal of Informetrics 10 (2): 336–346.10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of London. 2014. Report: Massive Open Online Courses 2014. In International Programmes: University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M. 2015. “MOOCs and the Silicon Valley Narrative.” Journal of Interactive Media in Education 5 (1): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• York, T., C. Gibson, and S. Rankin. 2015. “Defining and Measuring Academic Success.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 20 (5): 2.
   Google Scholar