Online tasks and students’ transformative agency: double-stimulation as a design principle for synchronous online workshops

References

• Angus, Lawrence, Barry Golding, Annette Foley, and Peter Lavender. 2013. “Promoting ‘Learner Voice’ in VET: Developing Democratic, Transformative Possibilities or Further Entrenching the Status Quo?” Journal of Vocational Education and Training 65 (4): 560–574. doi:10.1080/13636820.2013.855648.
   Google Scholar
• Aprea, Carmela, and Alberto A. P. Cattaneo. 2019. “Designing Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Vocational Education and Training.” In The Wiley Handbook of Vocational Education and Training, edited by David Guile and Lorna Unwin, 373–393. Hoboken: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119098713.ch19.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Arthur, and Sanne Akkerman. 2019. “The Learning Potential of Boundary Crossing in the Vocational Curriculum.” In The Wiley Handbook of Vocational Education and Training, edited by David Guile and Lorna Unwin, 349–372. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781119098713.ch18.
   Google Scholar
• Barabasch, Antje. 2017. “Finding the Finishing Line – Career Support for Experimentation: Transitions and the Role of Lifelong Learning.” In Vocational Education and Training in Times of Economic Crisis, edited by M. Pilz, 25–40. Vol. 24. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47856-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, Brett, and Michelle Flood. 2015. “The Change Laboratory in Higher Education: Research-intervention Using Activity Theory.” In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, edited by Malcolm Tight and Jeroen Huisman, 141–168. Bingley: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S2056-375220150000001007.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Deniese, and Sarah Prestridge. 2020. “Understanding Fully Online Teaching in Vocational Education.” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 15 (1): 1. doi:10.1186/s41039-020-00138-4.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Yrjö. 1987/2015. Learning by Expanding. Second ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Yrjö, and Annalisa Sannino. 2020. “Toward a Vygotskian Perspective on Transformative Agency for Social Change.” In Revisiting Vygotsky for Social Change, edited by Adolfo Tanzi Neto, Fernanda Liberali, and Manolis Dafermos, 87–111. Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Karen. 2017. “Bounded Agency in Professional Lives.” In Agency at Work, Professional and Practice-Based Learning 20, edited by M. Goller and S. Paloniemi, 17–36. London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_2.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, Ian, Ken Spours, Richard Steer, Frank Coffield, Maggie Gregson, and Ann Hodgson. 2007. “‘The Heart of What We Do’: Policies on Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Learning and Skills Sector.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training 59 (2): 137–153. doi:10.1080/13636820701342442.
   Google Scholar
• Goller, Michael, and Susanna Paloniemi. 2017. “Agency at Work, Learning and Professional Development: An Introduction.” In Agency at Work: An Agentic Perspective on Professional Learning and Development., edited by Michael Goller and Susanna Paloniemi, 1–14. Vol. 20. London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0.
   Google Scholar
• Guile, David. 2011. “Learning at the Boundary: A Commentary.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (1): 55–61. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.010.
   Google Scholar
• Haapasaari, Arja, Yrjö Engeström, and Hannele Kerosuo. 2016. “The Emergence of Learners’ Transformative Agency in a Change Laboratory Intervention.” Journal of Education and Work 29 (2): 232–262. doi:10.1080/13639080.2014.900168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, Paul. 2019. “VET, HRD, and Workplace Learning: Where to from Here?” In The Wiley Handbook of Vocational Education and Training, edited by David Guile and Lorna Unwin, 63–80. Hoboken: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119098713.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Hyslop-Margison, E. J. 2004. “Technology, Human Agency and Dewey’s Constructivism: Opening Democratic Spaces in Virtual Classrooms.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 20 (2): 137–148. doi:10.14742/ajet.1356.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, Thomas, and Jens Drummer. 2018. “Recent Technological Challenges in (Vocational) Education.” In Vocational Teacher Education in Central Asia, edited by Jens Drummer, Gafurjon Hakimov, Mamatair Joldoshov, Thomas Köhler, and Svetlana Udartseva, 3–14. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73093-6_1.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, Philip, and Brett Bligh. 2021. “Video and the Pedagogy of Expansive Learning: Insights from a Research-Intervention in Engineering Education.” In Video Pedagogy, edited by Dilani Gedera and Arezou Zalipour, 123–145. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4009-1_7.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Michael. 1974/1988. “On a Theory of Independent Study.” David Sewart, Desmond Keegan, and Borje Holmbergedited by Distance Education: International Perspectives5,68–94.London:Routledge.10.4324/9781003033950-8
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Damian, Yu Serena, and John Buchanan. 2019. “Political Economy of Vocational Education and Training.” In The Wiley Handbook of Vocational Education and Training, edited by David Guile and Lorna Unwin, 113–136. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, . doi:10.1002/9781119098713.ch7.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, Priscilla. 2015. “Learning to Work during Work Placement: Negotiating Access to Work and Participation through ‘Origination’ and Establishing a ‘Legitimate Presence.’.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training 67 (4): 543–557. doi:10.1080/13636820.2015.1076501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada-Pallarès, Carla, Angelina Sánchez-Martí, Anna Ciraso-Calí, and Pilar Pineda-Herrero. 2019. “Online Vs. Classroom Learning: Examining Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies among Vocational Education and Training Students.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (December). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renshaw, Peter. 2016. “On the Notion of Worthwhile Agency in Reformist Pedagogies.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 10: 60–63. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, Annalisa. 2015. “The Principle of Double Stimulation: A Path to Volitional Action.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 6: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, Annalisa, and Anne Laitinen. 2015. “Double Stimulation in the Waiting Experiment: Testing a Vygotskian Model of the Emergence of Volitional Action.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 4: 4–18. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Raymond. 2018. “Learner Agency and the Negotiation of Practice.” In Integration of Vocational Education and Training Experiences, edited by Sarojni Choy, Gun-Britt Wärvik, and Viveca Lindberg, 107–123. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8857-5_6.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J. 2006. “Dilemmas in Building Shared Transformative Agency.” Activities/@ctivités 3 (1): 43–66. doi:10.4000/activites.1850.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J, and D Newnham. 2013. The Change Laboratory: A Tool for Collaborative Development of Work and Education. Rotterdam: SensePublishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-326-3.
   Google Scholar
• Westerhuis, A. 2009. “VET Research in Relation to VET Policy, Planning and Practice.” In Handbook of Technical and Vocational Education and Training Research, edited by Felix Rauner and Rupert Maclean, 93–156. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8347-1.
   Google Scholar
• Zepke, Nick, Peter Isaacs, and Linda Leach. 2009. “Learner Success, Retention and Power in Vocational Education: A Snapshot from Research.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training 61 (4): 447–458. doi:10.1080/13636820903378376.
   Google Scholar