Examining student profiles for dealing with wickedness

References

• Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., and T. Bruining. 2016. “Multilevel Boundary Crossing in a Professional Development School Partnership.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 25 (2): 240–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1147448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arenas, A., C. Tabernero, and E. Briones. 2006. “Effects of Goal Orientation, Error Orientation and Self-Efficacy on Performance in an Uncertain Situation.” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 34 (5): 569–586. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.5.569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford, S. J., and L. L. Cummings. 1985. “Proactive Feedback Seeking: The Instrumental Use of the Information Environment.” Journal of Occupational Psychology 58 (1): 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00181.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avvisati, F., G. Jacotin, and S. Vincent-Lancrin. 2013. “Educating Higher Education Students for Innovative Economies: What International Data Tells Us.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1 (1): 223–240. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-1(1)-2013pp223-240.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, T. S., and J. M. Crant. 1993. “The Proactive Component of Organizational Behavior: A Measure and Correlates.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 14 (2): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, S., M. R. Hallowell, W. Alruqi, and R. Salas. 2021. “Modeling the Relationship Between Personal Risk Tolerance, Work-Related Risk Tolerance, and Risk-Taking Behavior of Construction Workers.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 147 (4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butter, R., and W. van Beest. 2015. “Hoe herkent u innovators in uw organisatie” [How to recognize innovators in your organisation]?” Md: Tijdschrift voor Talent en Managementontwikkeling 2015 (4): 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Butter, R., and W. van Beest. 2017, June. “Psychometric Validation of a Tool for Innovation Competencies Development and Assessment Using a Mixed-Method Design.” Paper presented at EURAM, Glasgow, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Caliński, T., and J. Harabasz. 1974. “A Dendrite Method for Cluster Analysis.” Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 3 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927408827101.
   Google Scholar
• Caratozzolo, P., A. Alvarez-Delgado, and S. Hosseini. 2020, April. “Metacognitive Awareness and Creative Thinking: The Capacity to Cope with Uncertainty in Engineering.” Paper presented at the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, Al Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Chatenier, E. D., J. M. Verstegen, H. A. Biemans, M. Mulder, and O. F. Omta. 2010. “Identification of Competencies for Professionals in Open Innovation Teams.” R&D Management 40 (3): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, N., and A. Davis. 2011. “Absorptive Capacity at the Individual Level: Linking Creativity to Innovation in Academia.” The Review of Higher Education 34 (3): 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2011.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin Crick, R., and C. Goldspink. 2014. “Learner Dispositions, Self-Theories and Student Engagement.” British Journal of Educational Studies 62 (1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2014.904038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y.1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., R. Engeström, and M. Kärkkäinen. 1995. “Polycontextuality and Boundary Crossing in Expert Cognition: Learning and Problem Solving in Complex Work Activities.” Learning and Instruction 5 (4): 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00021-6.
   Google Scholar
• Funke, J., A. Fischer, and D. V. Holt. 2018. “Competencies for Complexity: Problem Solving in the Twenty-First Century.” In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Research and Applications, edited by E. Care, P. Griffin, and M. Wilson, 41–53. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_3.
   Google Scholar
• Gonczi, A. 2003. “Teaching and Learning of the Key Competencies.” In Contribution to the Second DeSeco Symposium, edited by D.S. Rychen, L.H. Salganik, and M.E. McLaughlin, 119–131. Neuchatel, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Statistical Office.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, P. A., Jr. 2000. “Cluster Analysis.” In Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modelling, edited by H.E.A. Tinsley and S.D. Brown, 297–321. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grohs, J. R., G. R. Kirk, M. M. Soledad, and D. B. Knight. 2018. “Assessing Systems Thinking: A Tool to Measure Complex Reasoning Through Ill-Structured Problems.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 28:110–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guile, D., and L. Unwin. 2020. “Expertise as a ‘Capacity for Action’: Reframing Vocational Knowledge from the Perspective of Work.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 74 (1): 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1858939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulikers, J., and C. Oonk. 2016. ““Het waarderen van leren met partijen buiten de school” [Appreciating learning with partners outside the school].” OnderwijsInnovatie 3 (4): 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gulikers, J., and C. Oonk. 2019. “Towards a Rubric for Stimulating and Evaluating Sustainable Learning.” Sustainability 11 (4): 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, P. 2017. “The Integrated View on Competence.” In Competence-Based Vocational and Professional Education: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, edited by M. Mulder, 203–228. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_10.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2008. “Wicked Problems in Public Policy.” Public Policy 3 (2): 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2019. “Forty Years of Wicked Problems Literature: Forging Closer Links to Policy Studies.” Policy and Society 38 (2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., and J. Alford. 2015. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration & Society 47 (6): 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., and W.-N. Xiang. 2016. “Why is an APT Approach to Wicked Problems Important?” Landscape and Urban Planning 154:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hero, L.-M., E. Lindfors, and V. Taatila. 2017. “Individual Innovation Competence: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” International Journal of Higher Education 6 (5): 103–121. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p103.
   Google Scholar
• Karakowsky, L., and A. Elangovan. 2001. “Risky Decision Making in Mixed-Gender Teams: Whose Risk Tolerance Matters?” Small Group Research 32 (1): 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keinänen, M., and R. Butter. 2018. “Applying a Self-Assessment Tool to Enhance Personalized Development of Students’ Innovation Competences in the Context of University-Company Cooperation.” Journal of University Pedagogy 2 (1): 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Keinänen, M. M., and L. Kairisto-Mertanen. 2019. “Researching Learning Environments and Students’ Innovation Competences.” Education + Training 61 (1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2018-0064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leys, C., M. Delacre, Y. L. Mora, D. Lakens, and C. Ley. 2019. “How to Classify, Detect, and Manage Univariate and Multivariate Outliers, with Emphasis on Pre-Registration.” International Review of Social Psychology 32 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. 1988. “A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83 (404): 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin-Garcia, J. A., M.Á. Andreu-Andrés, L. Atares-Huerta, L. E. Aznar-Mas, A. Garcia-Carbonell, F. González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, B. Montero Fleta, M. J. Perez-Peñalver, and F. Watts. 2016. “Proposal of a Framework for Innovation Competencies Development and Assessment (FINCODA).” WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management 7 (2): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v7i2.6472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, M., and T. A. Wolfer. 2021. “Using the Reflective Judgment Model to Understand and Appraise Effective Reasoning by Social Work Students.” Journal of Social Work Education 59 (1): 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2021.1970064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, M. 2014. “Conceptions of Professional Competence.” In International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-Based Learning, edited by S. Billett, C. Harteis, and H. Gruber, 107–137. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_5.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., and P. A. Alexander. 2000. “A Motivated Exploration of Motivation Terminology.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A. 1996. “Studying Context: A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Models, and Distributed Cognition.” In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, edited by B.A. Nardi, 69–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neubert, J., T. Lans, M. Mustafic, S. Greiff, and P. Ederer. 2017. “Complex Problem-Solving in a Changing World: Bridging Domain-Specific and Transversal Competence Demands in Vocational Education.” In Competence-Based Vocational and Professional Education: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, edited by M. Mulder, 953–969. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_44.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., and B. W. Head. 2017. “Wicked Tendencies in Policy Problems: Rethinking the Distinction Between Social and Technical Problems.” Policy and Society 36 (3): 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. 2007. “From ‘Pure’ to ‘Hybrid’ Professionalism: Present-Day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domains.” Administration & Society 39 (6): 761–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M., S. Douglas, K. Geuijen, and M. van der Steen. 2019. “Weaknesses of Wickedness: A Critical Perspective on Wickedness Theory.” Policy and Society 38 (2): 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1617970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odello, T., E. Hill, and E. Gómez. 2008. “Challenge Course Effectiveness: The Impact on Leadership Efficacy and Work Efficacy Among College Students.” Journal of Unconventional Parks, Tourism and Recreation Research 1 (1): 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Penttilä, T., and L. Kairisto-Mertanen. 2013. “Developing Innovation Competences Through Boundary Crossing in a Social Learning Environment. In Lehto, A., and Penttilä, T. (Eds.), Pedagogical Views on Innovation Competencies and Entrepreneurship. Innovation Pedagogy and Other Approaches, 34–44. Turku: Turku University of Applied Science.
   Google Scholar
• Pihie, Z. A. L., and A. S. A. Sani. 2009. “Exploring the Entrepreneurial Mindset of Students: Implications for Improvement of Entrepreneurial Learning at University.” The Journal of International Social Research 2 (8): 340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy sciences 4 (2): 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosso, B. D. 2014. “Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams.” Organization Studies 35 (4): 551–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613517600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and Y.-J. Lee. 2007. “‘Vygotsky’s Neglected legacy’: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory.” Review of Educational Research 77 (2): 186–232 https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychen, D. S. E., and L. J. E. Salganik. 2001. Defining and Selecting Key Competencies. Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Santandreu-Mascarell, C., D. Garzon, and H. Knorr. 2013. “Entrepreneurial and Innovative Competences, are They the Same?” Management Decision 51 (5): 1084–1095. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2012-0792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şeremet, M., M. Haigh, and E. Cihangir. 2021. “Fostering Constructive Thinking About the ‘Wicked Problems’ of Team-Work and Decision-Making in Tourism and Geography.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 45 (4): 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1869924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., N. Shaw, and J. Tredinnick. 2015. “Practice-Based Learning in Community Contexts: A Collaborative Exploration of Pedagogical Principles.” In Practice-Based Learning in Higher Education, edited by S. Kennedy, S. Billett, S. Gherardi, and L. Grealish, 141–157. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1994. “Working Relations of Technology Production and Use.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2:21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00749282
   Google Scholar
• Ten Dam, G., and M. Volman. 2004. “Critical Thinking as a Citizenship Competence: Teaching Strategies.” Learning and Instruction 14 (4): 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. J. A. M., A. Dewulf, G. Breeman, and S. J. Stiller. 2015. “Governance Capabilities for Dealing Wisely with Wicked Problems.” Administration & Society 47 (6): 680–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712469195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornau, K., and M. Frese. 2013. “Construct Clean‐Up in Proactivity Research: A Meta‐Analysis on the Nomological Net of Work‐Related Proactivity Concepts and Their Incremental Validities.” Applied Psychology 62 (1): 44–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00514.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman, M. E., J. Van Keulen, and J. M. Voogt. 2019. “Design Principles for Addressing Wicked Problems Through Boundary Crossing in Higher Professional Education.” Journal of Education & Work 32 (2): 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1610165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman, M. E., J. Van Keulen, and J. M. Voogt. 2021. “Using Problems with Wicked Tendencies as Vehicles for Learning in Higher Professional Education: Towards Coherent Curriculum Design.” The Curriculum Journal 32 (3): 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman, M. E., J. Van Keulen, and J. M. Voogt. 2022. “Teacher Strategies That Foster students’ Boundary-Crossing Expertise When Addressing Problems with Wicked Tendencies.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2022.2138509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 2000. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems.” Organization 7 (2): 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, W., G. Weckman, and W. Holland. 2011. “A Survey of Methodologies for the Treatment of Missing Values within Datasets: Limitations and Benefits.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 12 (1): 15–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220903470205.
   Google Scholar