Developing behavioural services to meet defined standards within a national system of specialist education services

References

• Gresham FM, McIntyre LL, Olson-Tinker H, Dolstra L, Mclaughlin V, Mei V. Relevance of functional behavioral assessment research for school-based interventions and positive behavioral support. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2004;25:19–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberto IA, Troutman AC. Applied behavior analysis for teachers, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Carr EG, Durand VM. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1985;18:111–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr EG, Mclaughlin DM, Horner RH, Turnbull AP, Marquis JG. Positive behavioral support for people with developmental disabilities. Washington DC: American Association on Mental Retardation; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper J, Heron T, Heward W. Applied behavior analysis. Columbus: Merrill; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Durand VM. Severe behavior problems: A functional communicative approach. New York: Guilford Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gable RA, Quinn MM, Rutherford RB, Howell K. Addressing problem behaviors in schools: use of functional assessments and behavior intervention plans. Preventing School Failure 1998;42:106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Horner RH. Functional assessment: contributions and future directions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994;27:401–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolivette K, Barton-Arwood S, Scott TM. Functional behavioral assessment as a collaborative process among professionals. Education and Treatment of Children 2000;23:298–313.
   Google Scholar
• Reid R, Maag JW. Functional assessment: A method for developing classroom-based accommodations and interven- tions for children with ADHD. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties 1998;14:9–42.
   Google Scholar
• LaVigna G, Donnellan A. Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies. New York: Irvington; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• LaVigna GW, Willis TJ, Donnellan AM. The role of positive programming in behavioral treatment. In: Cipani E, editor. The treatment of severe behavior disorders. Monographs of the American Association on Mental Retardation 1989;12:59–83.
   Google Scholar
• Luiselli J, Cameron M. Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sugai G, Lewis-Palmer T, Hagan-Burke S. Overview of the functional assessment process. Exceptionality 2000;8:149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton JP, Walker SC. A diagnostician’s primer on functional behavioral assessment. Diagnostique 1999;25:45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker M, Sigafoos J, Bushell H. Use of noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of challenging behavior. Behavior Modification 1998;22:529–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigle KL. Positive behavioral support as a model for promoting educational inclusion. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped 1997;22:36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Smith C, Cooke T. Collaboratively managing the behaviour of a reception class pupil. Educational Psychology in Practice 2000;16:235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Pitchford M. Understanding and helping a boy with problems: a functional approach to behaviour problems. Educational Pyschology in Practice 1997;13:115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Norgate R. Reducing self-injurious behavior in a child with severe learning difficulties: enhancing predictability and structure. Educational Psychology in Practice 1998;114:176–182.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson JR. Dealing with the challenging behavior of students with severe intellectual disability. Special Education Perspectives 1997;6:71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Beamish W, Bryer F, Wilson L. Positive behavioural support: an example of practice in the early years. Special Education Perspectives 2000;9:14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni O. A positive behaviour support: a preliminary evaluation of a school-wide plan for implementing AAC in a school for students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 2003;28:283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVigna G, Willis T. Challenging behavior: a model for overcoming the barriers to integration in the community. Journal of the Norwegian Association for Behavior Analysis 1996;23:43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Prochnow JE. Functional behaviour assessment of children. New Zealand Psychological Society Bulletin 1998;90:18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson JR, Roberts ML, Bullis M, Albers C, Ohland B. Functional behavioral assessment: Looking beyond applied behavior analysis. NASP Communique, 27 Bethesda, MS: National Association of School Pyschologists; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Noell GH. New directions in behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly 1996;11:187–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriver MD, Watson TS. A survey of behavior analysis and behavioral consultation courses in school psychology; implica- tions for training school psychologists. Journal of Behavioral Education 1999;9:211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer TR, Northrup J. Some implications of functional analysis for school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly 1996;11:76–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JL, Albin RW, Mesaros RA, Dunlap G, Morelli R. Issues in providing training to achieve comprehensive behavioral support. In: Reichle J, Wacher D, editors. Communicative alternatives to challenging behavior: Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: Brookes; 1993. pp. 363–406.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JL, Russo A, Dunlap G, Albin RW. A team training model for building the capacity to provide positive behavioral supports in inclusive settings. In: Koegel L, Koegel R, Dunlap G, editors. Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore: Brookes; 1996. pp. 467–490.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap G, Hieneman M, Knoster T, Fox L, Anderson J, Albin R. Essential elements of inservice training in positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 2000;2:22–32.
   Google Scholar
• LaVigna GW, Christian L, Liberman RP, Camacho RS, Willis TJ. Training professionals in the use of positive methods for community integration of persons with develop- mental disabilities. Psychiatric Services 2002;53:16–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan A, LaVigna GW, Schuler AL, Woodward PE. A strategy for widespread dissemination of inservice training of classroom personnel. Teacher Education and Special Education 1982;5:36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson A, Jauernig R, Wilken P, Radler G. Behavioural Treatment of challenging behaviour: a cost benefit analysis of a service delivery model. Behaviour Change 1995;12:216–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markey U, Markey DJ, Quant B, Santelli B, Turnbull A. Operation positive change: PBS in an urban context. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 2002;4:218–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVigna GW, Willis TJ. A model for multi-element support plan planning and outcome measurement. In: Berkell D, editor. Autism: Identification, education, and support plan. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992. pp. 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan AM, Mirenda P, Mesaros R, Fassbender L. A strategy for analyzing the communicative functions of behavior. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 1984;11:201–212.
   Google Scholar
• LaVigna GW, Willis TJ. Counter-intuitive strategies for crisis management within a non-aversive framework. In: Allen D, editor. Behaviour management in intellectual disabilities: Ethical responses to challenging behavior. Kidderminster, UK: British Institute of Learning Disabilities; 2002. pp. 89–103.
   Google Scholar
• LaVigna GW, Willis TJ. Episodic severity: an overlooked dependent variable in the application of behavior analysis to challenging behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, in press.
   Google Scholar
• LaVigna G, Willis T, Shaull J, Abedi M, Sweitzet M. The periodic service review: A total quality assurance system for human services and education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• LaVigna GW, Willis TJ, Shaull JF, Abedi M, Sweitzer M. Effective consultation for classroom and community settings. In: Cipani EC, Spooner F, editors. Curricular and instruc- tional approaches for persons with severe disabilities. Needham Heights, MA; Allyn and Bacon; 1994. pp. 387–403.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf MM. Social validity: the case for subjective measure- ment or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1978;11:203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis T, LaVigna G. Behavioral assessment report and intervention plan: Evaluation instrument. Los Angeles: Institute for Applied Behavior Analysis; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Carr E. The motivation of self-injurious behavior: a review of some hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin 1977;84:800–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr E. Functional equivalence as a mechanism of response generalization. In: Horner R, Dunlap G, Koegel R, editors. Generalization and maintenance. Life-style changes in applied settings. Baltimore: Brookes; 1988. pp. 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Ciminero A, Calhoun K, Adams H. Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Durand M. The motivational assessment scale. In: Hersen M, Bellack A, editors. Dictionary of behavioral assessment techniques. New York: Pergamon Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins R. The functions of assessment: Implications for selection and development of devices for assessing repertoires in clinical, educational, and other settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1979;12:501–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins R. Selection of target behaviors. In: Nelson R, Hayes S, editors. Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment. New York: Guilford; 1986. pp. 331–385.
   Google Scholar
• Iwata B, Dorsey M, Slifer K, Bakman K, Richman G. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities 1982;3:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill R, Horner R, Albin R, Sprague J. Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Sulzer-Azaroff B, Mayer R. Behavior analysis for lasting change. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes SN, Nelson RO, Jarrett RB. The treatment utility of assessment: a functional approach to evaluating assessment quality. American Psychologist 1987;5:251–253.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan AM, LaVigna GW, Zambito J, Thvedt J. A time limited intensive intervention program model to support community placement for persons with severe behavior problems. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 1985;10:123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson A, Wilken P, Jauernig R, Radler G. Regionally based teams for the treatment of challenging behaviour: a three-year outcome study. Behaviour Change 1995;12:209–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill MT, Kratochwill TR, Elliott SN. Functional assess- ment in consultation: a treatment utility study. School Psychology Quarterly 1998;13:116–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar