The scholar, the wealthy and the powerful: notes on academic culture in elite-focused fieldwork

References

• Aguiar, Luis L. M., and Christopher J. Schneider. 2012. Researching Amongst Elites: Challenges and Opportunities in Studying Up, 549 p. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Louise. 2002. “‘It’s easier that you’re a girl and that you’re Asian’: Interactions of ‘race’ and Gender Between Researchers and Participants.” Feminist Review 72 (1): 108–132.10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaud, Stéphane, and Florence Weber. [1997] 2003. Guide de l’enquête de terrain: produire et analyser des données ethnographiques, 2010 [A Handbook for Social Science Fieldwork: Producing and Analysing Ethnographic Data]. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc. 1973. “L’espace positionnel. Multiplicite des positions institutionnelles et habitus de classe.” Revue Française de Sociologie 14 (1): 3–25.10.2307/3320321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1967. “Systems of Education and Systems of Thought.” International Social Science Journal 19 (3): 338–358.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. “The Scholastic Point of View.” Cultural Anthropology 5 (4): 380–391.10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00030
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, Jean-Claude Chamboredon, and Jean-Claude Passeron. [1968] 1991. The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, Michael, ed. 2000. Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Randall. 1979. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, Kevin J. 2007. “Methodological Dilemmas and Opportunities in Interviewing Organizational Elites.” Sociology Compass 1 (1): 208–221.10.1111/soco.2007.1.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Eymeri, Jean-Michel. 2001. La fabrique des énarques [The Making of Enarques]. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Gluckman, Max. 1940. “Analysis of a Social Situation In Modern Zululand.” Bantu Studies 14 (1): 1–30.10.1080/02561751.1940.9676107
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, Rosanna, and Jonathan Imber, eds. 1995. Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods. London: Sage.10.4135/9781483327341
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, Hanna. 1995. “Research as a Communication Act: A Study on Israeli Women in Local Politics.” In Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods, edited by Jonathan B. Hertz and Rosanna Imber, 171–186, 210 p. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, Karen. 2012. “Studying Up’ Wall Street: Reflections on Theory and Methodology.” In Researching Amongst Elites: Challenges and Opportunities in Studying Up, edited by Luis L. M. Aguiar and Christopher J. Schneider, 549 p. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Adam, and Jane Kenway. 2015. “Canvassing Conversations: Obstinate Issues in Studies of Elites and Elite Education.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 28 (9): 1005–1032.10.1080/09518398.2015.1077536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowska, Longina. 2012. “Land, Historicity, and Lifestyle: Capital and Its Conversions among the Gentry in Poland.” In The Anthropology of Elites: Power, Culture, and the Complexities of Distinction, edited by Jon Abbink and Tijo Salverda, 45–69. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, Jane, and Julie McLeod. 2004. “Bourdieu’s Reflexive Sociology and ‘spaces of points of view’: Whose Reflexivity, which Perspective?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 25 (4): 525–544.10.1080/0142569042000236998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, Michèle, and Ann Swidler. 2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing.” Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153–171.10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurens, Sylvain. 2007. “‘Pourquoi’ et ‘comment’ poser les questions qui fâchent ?”. Genèses 69 (4): 112-127.
   Google Scholar
• Legavre, Jean-Baptiste. 1992. “Off the Record. Mode d’emploi d’un instrument de coordination.” Politix 5 (19): 135–158.10.3406/polix.1992.1533
   Google Scholar
• Lilti, Antoine. 2015. The World of the Salons: Sociability and Worldliness in Eighteenth-Century Paris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauger, Gérard. 2013. “De ‘l’homme de marbre’ au ‘beauf’.” Savoir/Agir 26 (4): 11–16.10.3917/sava.026.0011
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Claire, and Peter Aggleton. 2015. “Researching Elite Education: Affectively Inferred Belongings, Desires and Exclusions.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 28 (9): 1065–1080.10.1080/09518398.2015.1074751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, Mike, Sam Friedman, Laurie Hanquinet, and Andrew Miles. 2015. “Cultural Sociology and New Forms of Distinction.” Poetics 53: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offerlé, Michel. 2013. Les patrons des patrons. Histoire du Medef [The Bosses of Bosses. A History of MEDEF]. Paris: Odile Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrander, Susan A. 1993. “‘SURELY YOU’RE NOT IN THIS JUST TO BE HELPFUL’ Access, Rapport, and Interviews in Three Studies of Elites.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22 (1): 7–27.10.1177/089124193022001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinçon, Michel, and Monique Pinçon-Charlot. 1997. Voyage en grande bourgeoisie: journal d’enquête. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Ringer, Fritz K. 1992. Fields of Knowledge: French Academic Culture in Comparative Perspective, 1890–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabot, Emmanuèle. 1999. “Dr Jekyl, Mr H(i)de: The Contrasting Face of Elites at Interview.” Geoforum 30 (4): 329–335.10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serre, Delphine, and Anne-Catherine Wagner. 2015. “For a Relational Approach to Cultural Capital: A Concept Tested by Changes in the French Social Space.” The Sociological Review 63: 433–450.10.1111/1467-954X.12292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Katherine. 2006. “Problematising Power Relations in ‘elite’ Interviews.” Geoforum 37 (4): 643–653.10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, Loïc J. D. 1995. “Towards an Archeology of Academe: A Critical Appreciation of Fritz Ringer’s ‘Fields of Knowledge’.” Acta Sociologica 38 (2): 181–186.10.1177/000169939503800205
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1922] 1968. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. New York: Bedminister Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willemez, Laurent, Muriel Surdez, Fabienne Pavis, and Hélène Chamboredon. 1994. “S’imposer aux imposants. A propos de quelques obstacles rencontrés par des sociologues débutants dans la pratique et l’usage de l’entretien.” Genèses 16 (1): 114–132.
   Google Scholar
• van Zanten, Agnès, and Claire Maxwell. 2015. “Elite Education and the State in France: Durable Ties and New Challenges.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 36 (1): 71–94.10.1080/01425692.2014.968245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar