Genre and history/historying

References

• AndrewsT., and F.Burke. 2007. “What Does It Mean to Think Historically?” Perspectives: American Historical Association. http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2007/0701/0701tea2.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• AnkersmitF. R.1983. Narrative Logic: A Semantic Analysis of the Historian's Language. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• AnkersmitF. R.1990. “Reply to Professor Zagorin.” History and Theory293 (3 (October)): 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ApplebyJ., L.Hunt, and M.Jacob. 1994. Telling the Truth About History. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• BarthesR.1986. The Discourse of History. The Rustle of Language. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• ChapmanA.2013. “Is Sid Meier's Civilisation History?” Rethinking History17 (3): 523–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CohenR.1986. “History and Genre.” New Literary History17 (2): 203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DantoA.1985. Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de CerteauMichel. 1988. The Writing of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DonnellyM., and C.Norton. 2010. Doing History. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• EltonG. R.1967. The Practice of History. London: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• EltonG. R.1991. Return to Essentials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FootS.2005. “Finding the Meaning of Form: Narrative in Annals and Chroniclers.” In Writing Medieval History, edited by NancyPartner, 88–108. London: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• FryeN.1957. The Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genette, G., and T.Todorov, eds. 1986. Théorie des Genres [Theories of Genre]. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• HempelC.1942. “The Function of General Laws in History.” Journal of Philosophy39: 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• JenkinsK.1997. “Why Bother with History?” Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory & Practice1 (1): 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JenkinsK.1999. After History. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• JenkinsK., and A.Munslow. 2004. The Nature of History Reader. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• MarwickA. 1970. The Nature of History. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MelmanB.1993. “Gender, History and Memory: The Invention of Women's Past in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” History and Memory5 (1 Spring – Summer): 5–41.
   Google Scholar
• MunslowA.2007. Narrative and History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MunslowA.2011. “The Historian-Author.” Spiel30 (1): 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• MunslowA.2012. A History of History. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MunzP.1997. “The Historical Narrative.” In Companion to Historiography, edited by MichaelBentley, 851–872. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• NortonC.2006. “Fiction or Non-Fiction? Ottoman Accounts of the Siege of Nagykanizsa.” In Tropes for the Past: Hayden White and the History/Literature Debate, edited by K.Korhonen, 119–132. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• PhillipsM. S.2003. “Histories, Micro- and Literary: Problems of Genre and Distance.” New Literary History34: 211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RicoeurP.1984. The Reality of the Historical Past. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SalberM.2003. “Histories, Micro- and Literary: Problems of Genre and Distance.” New Literary History34 (2): 211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SeitelP.2003. “Theorizing Genres: Interpreting Works.” New Literary History34 (2): 275–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SouthgateB.2000. Why Bother with History?London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• SternF.1970. The Varieties of History: From Voltaire to the Present. New York: Meridian Books.
   Google Scholar
• SzijártóI. M.2013. “Co-Authoring History: Montpellier, the Vendée, and the Co-Authorship of the Sources.” Humanities2: 449–461. doi:10.3390/h2040449.
   Google Scholar
• ToshJ.2013. The Pursuit of History. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• VernonJ.1994. “Who's Afraid of the ‘Linguistic Turn’? The Politics of Social History and Its Discontents.” Social History19 (1 (January): 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VeyneP.1971. Comment on ecrit l'histoire: Essai d'dpistemologie [Writing History: Essay on Epistemology]. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• WandelT.2000. “Michel de Certeau's Place in History.” Rethinking History4 (1): 55–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhiteH.1966. “The Burden of History.” History and Theory5 (2): 111–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhiteH.1973. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth Century Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WhiteH.2003. “Anomalies of Genre: The Utility of Theory and History for the Study of Literary Genres.” New Literary History34 (3): 597–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZeleňákE.2011. “Modifying Alun Munslow's Classification of Approaches to History.” Rethinking History15 (4): 523–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar