KNOWING IS SEEING: distance and proximity in affective virtual reality history

References

• Agnew, V. 2007. “History’s Affective Turn: Historical Reenactment and Its Work in the Present.” Rethinking History 3: 299–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13642520701353108.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, V., J. Lamb, and J. Tomann, eds. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies: Key Concepts in the Field. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, S. J., J. N. Bailenson, and D. Park. 2014. “Short- and Long-term Effects of Embodied Experiences in Immersive Virtual Environments on Environmental Locus of Control and Behavior.” Computers in Human Behavior 39: 235–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bal, M. 2009. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bresler, L., ed. 2004. Knowing Bodies, Moving Minds: Towards Embodied Teaching and Learning. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. 2016. Music and Embodied Cognition: Listening, Moving, Feeling, and Thinking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crary, J. 1988. “Modernizing Vision.” In Vision and Visuality, edited by H. Foster, 29–44. Seattle: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crary, J. 1990. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, O.L., Jr., E. A. Yeager, and S. J. Foster, eds. 2001. Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijin, P. 2014. “Bridges to the Past: Historical Distance and Multiperspectivity in English and Dutch Heritage Educational Resources.” PhD diss., Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N., and D. Wilson. 2000. “In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages.” Language 76 (3): 546–592. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/417135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, J. E. 1997. “Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J. E. 2005. “Primary Metaphors as Inputs to Conceptual Integration.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (10): 1595–1614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grever, M., P. de Bruijin, and C. von Boxtel. 2012. “Negotiating Historical Distance: Or, How to Deal with the past as a Foreign Country in Heritage Education.” Pedagogica Historica 48 (6): 873–887. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2012.709527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldi, J., and D. Armitage. 2014. The History Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbrecht, H. U. 2006. “Presence Achieved in Language (With Special Attention Given to the Presence of the Past.” History and Theory 45 (3): 317–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00367.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampe, B., ed. 2017. Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1988. “Scopic Regimes of Modernity.” In Vision and Visuality, edited by H. Foster, 3–23. Seattle: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1993. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-century French Thought. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, H. 2001. The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. 2017. “Preparing to Teach a Slavery Past: History Teachers and Educators as Navigators of Historical Distance.” Theory and Research in Social Education 45 (1): 75–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1213677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. The Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg, A. 2015. Engaging the Past: Mass Culture and the Production of Historical Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 2015. The past Is a Foreign Country: Revisited. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Modrak, R., with Anthes, B. 2011. Reframing Photography: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, P. 1988. That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. S. 2013a. “Introduction: Rethinking Historical Distance.” In Rethinking Historical Distance, edited by M. S. Phillips, B. Caine, and J. Adeney Thomas, 1–18. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. S. 2013b. On Historical Distance. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runia, E. 2014. Moved by the Past: Discontinuity and Historical Mutation. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P., L. Gibson, and K. Ercikan. 2015. “A Design Process for Assessing Historical Thinking.” In New Directions in Assessing Historical Thinking, edited by Kadriye Ercikan and Peter Seixas, 102–113. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P., and T. Morton. 2013. The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts. Toronto: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Staley, J. D. 2021. Historical Imagination. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, N. 2008. “Metaphor from Body and Culture.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by R. W. Gibbs Jr., 247–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. 2003. Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar