The problem of teleological history education and the possibilities of a multispecies, multiscalar, and non-continuous history

References

• Assmann, Aleida. 2020. Is Time Out of Joint?: On the Rise and Fall of the Modern Time Regime. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). 2021. AustralianHistory Curriculum (Version 8.4). https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/humanities-and-social-sciences/history/
   Google Scholar
• Baratay, Éric. 2017. Biographies Animales. Des Vies Retrouvées. Vol. 2017. Paris: Média Diffusion.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, Keith, and Linda Levstik. 2004. Teaching History for the Common Good. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bevernage, Berber. 2012a. History, Memory, and State-Sponsored Violence: Time and Justice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bevernage, Berber. 2012b. “From Philosophy of History to Philosophy of Historicities: Some Idea on a Potential Future of Historical Theory.” Low Countries Historical Review 127 (4): 113–120. doi:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.8231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, Deborah. 1998. Lost Subjects, Contested Objects: Toward a Psychoanalytic Inquiry of Learning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, Adam. 2021. ‘Making It Sexy: ’ Teachers Hope Revamp Will Aave VCE Australian History. The Age. June 28. Accessed 26 April 2023. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/making-it-sexy-teachers-hope-revamp-will-save-vce-australian-history-20210625-p5848d.html
   Google Scholar
• Carr, David. 2021. Historical Experience: Essays on the Phenomenology of History. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carretero, Mario, and Floor van Alphen. 2014. “Do Master Narratives Change Among High School Students? A Characterization of How National History is Represented.” Cognition & Instruction 32 (3): 290–312. doi:10.1080/07370008.2014.919298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, Arthur. 2018. “Orientation to the Past”: Some Reflections on Historical Consciousness Research in England.” In Contemplating Historical Consciousness: Notes from the Field, edited by Anna Clark and Carla Peck, 32–45. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, David. 2004. Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Anna. 2018. “Teaching Difficult Histories in Australia.” In Teaching and Learning Difficult Histories in International Contexts: A Critical Sociocultural Approach, edited by Terrie Epstein and Carla Peck, 81–94. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Anna. 2021. “10 Things Every Politician Should Know About History,” The Conversation. October 25. Accessed 26 April 2023. https://theconversation.com/10-things-every-politician-should-know-about-history-170626.
   Google Scholar
• Cranny, Michael. 1999. Horizons: Canada Moves West. Toronto: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Danch, Alia Baker. 2023. “The Nonhuman Animal in Social Studies: Critical Animal Studies for Empathy,” Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, Kent. 2004. “A Dialogue on Narrative and Historical Consciousness.” In Theorizing Historical Consciousness, edited by Peter Seixas, 202–211. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, Kent. 2017. “Doing Better Than Just Falling Forward: Linking Subject Matter with Explicit Futures Thinking.” One World in Dialogue 4 (1): 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dozono, Tadashi. 2022. “Race and the Evidence of Experience: Accounting for Race in Historical Thinking Pedagogy.” Critical Studies in Education 63 (4): 468–484. doi:10.1080/17508487.2021.1899951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, Janine Giordano, and Robert Cohen. 2022. “Debating the 1619 Project.” Social Education 86 (1): 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Ronald W. 2004. The Social Studies Wars: What Should We Teach the Children?. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fareld, Victoria. 2022. “Framing the Polychronic Present.” In Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future, edited by Zoltan Simon and Lars Deile, 25–34. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Fudge, Erica. 2017. “What Was It Like to Be a Cow?” In The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies, edited by Linda Kalof, 258–263. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Bill. 2018. “Understanding Curriculum? Notes Towards a Conceptual Basis for Curriculum Inquiry.” Curriculum Perspectives 38: 81–84. doi:10.1007/s41297-017-0038-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hallman-Chong, Stanley, and Charlene Hendricks. 2016. Nelson History 8. Toronto: Nelson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Jones, Nikole. 2019. “Our Democracy’s Founding Ideals Were False When They Were Written. Black Americans Have Fought to Make Them True.” The New York Times Magazine 14. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/1619-america-slavery.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hartog, François. 2015. Regimes of Historicity: Presentism and Experiences of Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, Jonathan. 2009. “Potential and Pitfall in Teaching Big Pictures of the Past.” Teaching History 136: 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes-Warrington, Marnie. 2022. “Infinite History.” In Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future, edited by Zoltan Simon and Lars Deile, 71–78. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Jonker, Ed. 2012. “Reflections on History Education: Easy and Difficult Histories.” Journal of Educational Media, Memory and Society 4 (1): 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Jordheim, Helge. 2014. “Multiple Times and the Work of Synchronization.” History & Theory 53 (4): 498–518. doi:10.1111/hith.10728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keirn, Tim. 2018. “History Curriculum, Standards, and Assessment Policies and Politics: US Experiences.” In The Wiley International Handbook of History Teaching and Learning, edited by Scott Metzger and Lauren McArthur Harris, 11–36. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, M. 2019. History Education for Transitional Justice? Challenges, Limitations and Possibilities for Settler Colonial Australia. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 13 (1): 113–133. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijy026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keynes, Mati. 2021. “Engaging Transitional Justice in Australian History Curriculum: Times, Temporalities and Historical Thinking.” Curriculum Inquiry 51 (4): 1–24. doi:10.1080/03626784.2021.1938972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, LaGarrett. 2020. “Black History is Not American History: Toward a Framework of Black Historical Consciousness.” Social Education 84 (6): 335–341.
   Google Scholar
• Kuukkanen, J.-M. 2020. Philosophy of History: Twenty-First-Century Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Peter. 2004. “Understanding History.” In Theorizing Historical Consciousness, edited by Peter Seixas, 129–164. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, Chris, and Berber Bevernage, eds. 2013. Breaking Up Time: Negotiating the Borders Between Present, Past and Future. Amsterdam: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Macintyre, Stuart, and Anna, Clark. 2004. The History Wars. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, Heather, Jackson Pind, and Sara Karn. 2021. “A ‘Wicked Problem’: Rethinking History Education in the Anthropocene.” Rethinking History 25 (4): 483–507. doi:10.1080/13642529.2021.1992159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, J. 2018. “Teaching History for Truth and Reconciliation: The Challenges and Opportunities of Narrativity, Temporality, and Identity.” McGill Journal of Education 53 (2). doi:10.7202/1058399ar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles J. (2022). Guilt, complicity, and responsibility for historical injustice: towards a pedagogy of complex implication. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 1–17. doi:10.1080/14681366.2022.2064537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, James. 2019. “Seeing and Feeling Difficult History: A Case Study of How Canadian Students Make Sense of Photographs of Indian Residential Schools.” Theory & Research in Social Education 47 (4): 472–496. doi:10.1080/00933104.2019.1626783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, James. 2021. “Curriculum Reform in a Culture of Redress: How Social and Political Pressures are Shaping Social Studies Curriculum in Canada.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 53 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1080/00220272.2020.1822920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, James, and Lindsay Gibson. 2022. “Rethinking Presentism in History Education.” Theory & Research in Social Education 50 (4): 509–529. doi:10.1080/00933104.2022.2115959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council for Social Studies. 2013. Career, College, and Civic Life: C3 Framework for Social Studies Standards. Silver Spring, MD: National Council for Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• New York Department of Education. 2017. New York State Grades 9-12 Social Studies Framework. https://www.nysed.gov/sites/default/files/programs/curriculum-instruction/framework-9-12-with-2017-updates.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nordgren, Kenneth. 2023. “History Curriculum in the Anthropocene: How Should We Tell the Story?” In International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by R.J. Tierney; F. Rizvi, and K. Erkican, 296–307. Vol. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Nxumalo, Fikile. 2020. “Situating Indigenous and Black Childhoods in the Anthropocene.” In Research Handbook on Childhood Nature: Assemblages of Childhood and Nature Research, edited by Amy Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles; Karen Malone, and Elisabeth Barratt Hacking, 535–556. Cham: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Ken. 2003. “Teaching History in Schools: A Canadian Debate.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 35 (5): 585–626. doi:10.1080/0022027032000063544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, Nell. 2019. “How We Think About the Term Enslaved Matters. The Guardian. August 14. Accessed 26 April 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/14/slavery-in-america-1619-first-ships-jamestown
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, Robert J. 2007. “Reading History Curriculum as Postcolonial Text: Towards a Curricular Response to the History Wars in Australia and Beyond.” Curriculum Inquiry 37 (4): 383–400. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietsch, Tamson, and Frances Flanagan. 2020. “Here We Stand: Temporal Thinking in Urgent Times.” History Australia 17 (2): 252–271. doi:10.1080/14490854.2020.1758577.
   Google Scholar
• Rademaker, Laura. 2021. “A History of Deep Time: Indigenous Knowledges and Deep Pasts in Settler-Colonial Presents.” History Australia 18 (4): 658–675. doi:10.1080/14490854.2021.1988651.
   Google Scholar
• Retz, Tyson. 2017. “The Structure of Historical Inquiry.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (6): 612–613. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1101365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retz, Tyson. 2022. “Teaching History on the Scale of the Anthropocene: Three Ethical Challenges.” Historical Encounters Journal 9 (2): 7–17. doi:10.52289/hej9.202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runia, Eelco. 2006. “Presence.” History & Theory 45 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2303.2006.00346.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runia, Eelco. 2010. “Into Cleanness Leaping: The Vertiginous Urge to Commit History.” History & Theory 49 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00525.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüsen, Jörn. 1989. “The Development of Narrative Competence in Historical Learning — an Ontogenetic Hypothesis Concerning Moral Consciousness.” History & Memory 1 (2): 35–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, Jörn. 2005. History: Narration, Interpretation, Orientation. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Edmund. 2011. Evolutionary History: Uniting History and Biology to Understand Life on Earth. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, Glenn, and Kate O’Connor. 2015. “National Agendas in Global Times: Curriculum Reforms in Australia and the USA Since the 1980s.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (5): 609–630. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.969321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, Peter. 2000. “Schweigen! Die Kinder! Or, Does Postmodern History Have a Place in the Schools.” In Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History: National and International Perspectives, edited by Peter Stearns; Peter Seixas, and Sam Wineburg, 19–37. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, Peter. 2017. “A Model of Historical Thinking.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (6): 593–605. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1101363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemilt, Denis. 2000. “The Caliph’s Coin: The Currency of Narrative Frameworks in History Teaching.” In Knowing, Teaching & Learning History, National and International Perspectives, edited by Peter Stearns; Peter Seixas, and Sam Wineburg, 83–101. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shemilt, Denis and Schools Council (Great Britain). 1980. “History 13-16 Project”, History 13-16 Evaluation Study. Edinburgh: Holmes McDougall.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Roger I. 2005. The Touch of the Past: Remembrance, Learning, and Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. 2019. History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21^st. Century. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Zoltán Boldizśar, and Lars Deile, eds. 2022. Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Leanne. 2017. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom Through Radical Resistance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamm, Marek, and Zoltán Boldizsár Simon. 2020. “More-Than-Human History: Philosophy of History at the Time of the Anthropocene.” In Philosophy of History: Twenty-First Century Perspectives, edited by J.M. Kuukkanen, 198–215. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Tamm, Marek., and Peter. Burke, eds. 2018. Debating New Approaches to History. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Terrie, Epstein, and Carla L. Peck, eds. 2018. Teaching and Learning Difficult Histories in International Contexts. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, Robert, and Anders Persson. 2020. “On Historical Thinking and the History Educational Challenge.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (8): 891–901. doi:10.1080/00131857.2020.1712550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilschut, Arie J. 2010. “History at the Mercy of Politicians and Ideologies: Germany, England, and the Netherlands in the 19th and 20th Centuries.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 42 (5): 693–723. doi:10.1080/00220270903049446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wils, Kaat, and Tom Verschaffel. 2012. “Longing for the Present in the History of History Education.” Pedagogica Historicia 48 (6): 793–799. doi:10.1080/00309230.2012.739182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, Michalinos. 2014. “Theorizing ‘Difficult Knowledge’ in the Aftermath of the ‘Affective Turn’: Implications for Curriculum and Pedagogy in Handling Traumatic Representations.” Curriculum Inquiry 44 (3): 390–412. doi:10.1111/curi.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Jonathan. 2022. Whose America?: Culture Wars in the Public Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar