References

• Bambling, M., & King, R. (2014). Supervisor social skill and supervision outcome. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 14(4), 256–262.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Pearson: Harlow.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. S. (1983). Supervision in counseling: II. Contemporary models of supervision: A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(1), 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, J. (2012). Research on psychotherapists’ professional development during and after training. Nordic Psychology, 64(3), 150–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, J., Norberg, J., Sandell, R., & Schubert, J. (2011). Searching for recognition: The professional development of psychodynamic psychotherapists during training and the first few years after it. Psychotherapy Research, 21(2), 141–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V. (2010). Bridging the science and practice of clinical supervision: Some discoveries, some misconceptions. The Clinical Supervisor, 29(1), 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V., Berger, L., Hanus, A. E., Ayala, E. E., Swords, B. A., & Siembor, M. (2014). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a revised framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 434–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, L. A., Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Ancis, J. R. (2001). Psychotherapy trainees’ experience of counterproductive events in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 371–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. A., Hill, C. E., Holmes, S. E., & Freitas, G. F. (2005). Supervisor perspective on the process and outcome of giving easy, difficult, or no feedback to supervisees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. H., & Tanggaard, L. (2009). Beginning therapists’ experiences of what constitutes good and bad psychotherapy supervision with a special focus on individual differences. Nordic Psychology, 61(4), 59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999a). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77(4), 447–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal Of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 10–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Lehrman-Waterman, D., Molinaro, M., & Wolgast, B. (1999b). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(3), 443–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., & Lehrman-Waterman, D. E. (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38(3), 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Langemar, P. (2008). Kvalitativ forskningsmetodik i psykologi [Qualitative research methods in psychologhy]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Mehr, K. E., Ladany, N., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2015). Factors influencing trainee willingness to disclose in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9(1), 44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee’s perspective. Journal Of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 384–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norberg, J., Axelsson, H., Barkman, N., Hamrin, M., & Carlsson, J. (2016). What psychodynamic supervisors say about supervision: Freedom within limits. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(2), 268–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ögren, M.-L., & Sundin, E. C. (2009). Group supervision in psychotherapy. Main findings from a Swedish research project on psychotherapy supervision in a group format. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 37(2), 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., & Rønnestad, M. H., & the Collaborative Research Network of the Society for Psychotherapy Research. (2005). How psychotherapists develop: A study of therapeutic work and professional growth (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Sánchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L. O., Wright, L. K., … Rodolfa, E. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 197–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2012). The developing practitioner: Growth and stagnation of therapists and counselors. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoltenberg, C. D., & McNeill, B. W. (2010). IDM supervision, an integrative developmental model for supervising counselors and therapists (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Strømme, H. (2012). Confronting helplessness: A study of the acquisition of dynamic psychotherapeutic competence by psychology students. Nordic Psychology, 64(3), 203–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veilleux, J. C., Sandeen, E., & Levensky, E. (2014). Dialectical tensions supervisor attitudes and contextual influences in psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 44(1), 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet [Swedish Research Counsil]. (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning [Research ethics within humanistic-social research]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. E. (2015). The learning alliance in psychoanalytic supervision: A fifty-year retrospective and prospective. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32(3), 451–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar