A Potential Method for the Interpretive Synthesis of Qualitative Research: Issues in the Development of ‘Meta-Interpretation’

References

• Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., et al. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 671–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). (pp. 509–535). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Oxman, A.D.(Eds.) (2001). The Cochrane Collaboration brochure. Retrieved 5 January, 2002 from http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane/cc-broch.htm#BDL.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Young, B., Jones, D., & Sutton, A. (2004). Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence. Report to the Health Development Agency. London: Health Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, L. H. (2003). Synthesis through meta-ethnography: Paradoxes, enhancements and possibili-ties. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 321–344.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D., & Chang, A. (2000). Changing practice: Evidence based practice information sheets for health professionals. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery.
   Google Scholar
• Forscher, B. K. (1963). Chaos in the brickyard. Science, 142, 35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.Fuller(2005, February 18). You call yourself an intellectual? Times Higher Education Supplement, pp. 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J. (1998). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Social Research Update, 22, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, T. P., Jahad, A. R., & Moher, D. (1998). Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 152, 700–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. (1979). Meaning in context. Harvard Educational Review, 119(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesising qualitative studies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2001). Evidence-based policy: The promise of realist synthesis. Evaluation, 8(3), 340–358.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., & Henwood, K.(1996). Grounded theory: Practical implementation. In T.E.John Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 86–101). Leicester: BPS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rantala, K., & Wellstrom, E. (2001). Qualitative comparative analysis and a hermeneutic approach to interview data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4(2), 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Rist, R. (1990). Meta-ethnography. Educational Studies, 21, 364–367.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (1990). Meta-theorising in sociology. Sociological Forum, 5(1), 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K.A., Jones, D.R., Abrams, K.R., Dixon-Woods, M., & Fitzpatrick, R.(1998). Meta-analysis of qualitative and quantitative evidence: An example based on studies of patient satisfaction. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Survey Computing on Thinking Bigger, Thinking Smaller: Learning about Qualitative Research, London, UK,. 15 April.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Little, C., Hamann, M. S., & Jurs, S. G. (2002). Evaluations of after-school programs: A meta-evaluation of methodologies and narrative synthesis of findings. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(4), 387–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. (1966). Policy, poetry and success. Economic Journal, 76(3), 755–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretive phenom-enological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (2003). Validity and qualitative psychology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 232–235). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1997). Doing interpretive phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray, & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 218–240). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Solesbury, W. (2002). The ascendancy of evidence. Planning Theory and Practice, 3(1), 90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). (pp. 435–454). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and tech-niques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1983). Types of synthesis and their criteria. In S. Ward, & L. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use (pp. 343–362). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, S., Jenson, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G. W., & Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative meta-synthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1342–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., & Denyer, D.(2002). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed manage-ment knowledge by means of systematic review. Report to the ESRC (grant no. IMRC19). UK:. Cranfield Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mannen, J., Manning, P. K., & Miller, M. L. (1988). Series editors’ introduction. In G. W. Noblit, & R. D. Hare (Eds.), Meta-ethnography: Synthesising qualitative studies (pp. 5–6). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M.E.(2002). Sports tourism and identity: Developing a sports tourism participation model. Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the European Association of Sports Management, Jyvaskyla, Finland, 4–7 September, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M. E. (2005). Meta-interpretation: A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis—quantitative methods for research synthesis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. (2000). Meta-analysis. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond, & C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). (pp. 414–425). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wright Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research, design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (1991). Meta-theory, meta-method, meta-data analysis: What, why and how? Sociological Perspectives, 34, 377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar