Personal reflections on cautions and considerations for navigating the path of grounded theory doctoral theses and dissertations: a long walk through a dark forest

References

• Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M. (2008). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A roadmap from beginning to end. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boser, S. (2007). Power, ethics, and the IRB: Dissonance over human participant review of participatory research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1060–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: An illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 305–316. doi:10.1080/13645570802156196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The sage handbook of grounded theory Bryant A. Charmaz K. Sage Thousand Oaks CA 2010
   Google Scholar
• Carey, E. (2010). Navigating the process of ethical approval: A methodological note. The Grounded Theory Review, 9(3), 19–31. Retrieved from http://groundedtheoryreview.com/
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2008, May 14). An introduction to constructing grounded theory. Paper presented at the 4th International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–131. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2003). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. doi:10.1080/13645579.2010.494930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (2002a). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. (2002b). Constructivist grounded theory? Retrieved April 3, 2012, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-02/3-02glaser-e.htm
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(6), 729–750.
   Google Scholar
• Grubs, R. E. (2006). Reimagining grounded theory: An interpretive stance. In N. B. Garman, & M. Piantanida (Eds.), The authority to imagine: The struggle toward representation in dissertation writing (pp. 81–96). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2004). Wrestling with philosophy: Improving scholarship in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 42–55. doi:10.1353/jhe.2003.0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbourn, B. (2006). The qualitative doctoral dissertation proposal. Teachers College Record, 108(4), 529–576. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00660.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A., Gough, B., Lawton, R., & Stratton, P. (2005). How should we supervise qualitative projects? Psychologist, 18(10), 616–618. Retrieved from http://www.thepsychologist.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin, A. M. (2003). Designing a grounded theory study: Some practicalities. Nursing in Critical Care, 8(5), 203–208. doi:10.1046/j.1362-1017.2003.00033.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGhee, G., Marland, G.R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 334–342. Retrieved from http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-2402
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, J. M. (2002). Writing the qualitative dissertation: Understanding by doing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, A. (2006). Coding issues in grounded theory. Issues in Educational Research, 16(1), 52–66. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier.html
   Google Scholar
• Nathaniel, A. K., & Andrews, T. (2007). How grounded theory can improve nursing care quality. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 22(4), 350–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nealon, J., & Giroux, S. (2003). The theory toolbox: Critical concepts for the humanities, arts, & social sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. K., Netting, F. E., & Thomas, M. L. (2008). Grounded theory-managing the challenge for those facing institutional review board oversight. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 28–45. doi:10.1177/1077800407308907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piantanida, M., & Garman, N. B. (1999). The qualitative dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherr, M. (2008). Making plum jam: A cautionary tale. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(8), 1401–1402. doi:10.1177/1077800408324390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K. W., & Howell, D. (2008). Clarifying analysis and interpretation in grounded theory: Using a conditional relationship guide and reflective coding matrix. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(2), 1–15. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index
   Google Scholar
• Shortell, S.M. (1999). The emergence of qualitative methods in health services research. Health Services Research. 34(5), 1083–1090. Retrieved from http://www.hsr.org/
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, C. (2009). Choosing to be present as counselors in training: A grounded theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, J. A., Clair, J. M., & Wilson, K. L. (2009). Problematics of grounded theory: Innovations for developing an increasingly rigourous qualitative method. Qualitative Research, 9(3), 355–381. doi:10.1177/1468794109106605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-H. (2009). Adolescent English language learners in the classroom: Students’ perceptions of using READ 180 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
   Google Scholar