Effects of intensive longitudinal data collection on pregnancy and contraceptive use

References

• Axhausen, K. W., Zimmermann, A., Schonfelder, S., Rindsfuser, G., & Haupt, T. (2002). Observing the rhythms of daily life: A six-week travel diary. Transportation, 29, 95–124.10.1023/A:1014247822322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, A., Sariou, S., & Koutsky, L. A. (2002). Obtaining sensitive data through the web: An example of design and methods. Epidemiology, 13, 640–645.10.1097/00001648-200211000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailar, B. A. (1989). Information needs, surveys, and measurement errors. In D. Kasprzyk, G. J. Duncan, G. Kalton, & M. P. Singh (Eds.), Panel surveys (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Wiley.10.1097/00006216-198901320-00003
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, D. (2008). A review and summary of studies on panel conditioning. In S. Menard (Ed.), Handbook of longitudinal research: Design, measurement, and analysis (pp. 123–138). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coxon, A. P. M. (1999). Parallel accounts? Discrepancies between self-report (diary) and recall (questionnaire) measures of the same sexual behaviour. AIDS Care, 11, 221–234.10.1080/09540129948108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi, L. P. (1948). The interview effect in polling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12, 99–111.10.1086/265924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowne, D., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row-Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P. (1950). Field experiments: Changing group productivity. In J. G. Miller (Ed.), Experiments in social process: A symposium on social psychology (pp. 81–96). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P. (1953). Experiments in field settings. In L. Festinger & D. Katz (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences (pp. 98–135). New York, NY: Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garry, M., Sharman, S. J., Feldman, J., Marlatt, G. A., & Loftus, E. F. (2002). Examining memory for heterosexual college students’ sexual experiences using an electronic mail diary. Health Psychology, 21, 629–634.10.1037/0278-6133.21.6.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., McDonald, R., Wan, C. K., Dittus, P. J., & Quinlan, S. (2002). The accuracy of self-reports of condom use and sexual behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1863–1905.10.1111/jasp.2002.32.issue-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., & Bytheway, B. (2001). An evaluation of the use of diaries in a study of medication in later life. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 183–204.10.1080/13645570010029467
   Google Scholar
• Kardes, F. R., Allen, C. T., & Pontes, M. J. (1993). Effects of multiple measurement operations on consumer judgment – Measurement reliability or reactivity. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 280–283.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847–865.10.1093/poq/nfn063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens, P., Tan, E. S., & Knibbe, R. A. (1988). Bias due to non-response in a Dutch survey on alcohol consumption. Addiction, 83, 1069–1077.10.1111/add.1988.83.issue-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32, 669–698.10.1111/padr.2006.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 131–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancarrow, C., & Cartwright, T. (2007). Online access panels and tracking research: The conditioning issue. International Journal of Market Research, 49, 573–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, K. E. E., Carey, M. P., & Vanable, P. A. (2003). Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 104–123.10.1207/S15324796ABM2602_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searles, J. S., Helzer, J. E., & Walter, D. E. (2000). Comparison of drinking patterns measured by daily reports and timeline follow back. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 277–286.10.1037/0893-164X.14.3.277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, A. M. (2007). The case for diet diaries in longitudinal studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10, 365–377.10.1080/13645570701677128
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., Allum, N., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2009). Attitudes over time: The psychology of panel conditioning. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys (pp. 113–126). New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743874
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinsk, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819322
   Google Scholar
• Warren, J. R., & Halpern-Manners, A. (2012). Panel conditioning in longitudinal social science surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 491–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, J., & Lievesley, D. (1989). Evidence of conditioning effects in the British social attitudes panel survey. In D. Kasprzyk, G. J. Duncan, G. Kalton, & M. P. Singh (Eds.), Panel surveys (pp. 319–339). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Welti, K., Wildsmith, E., & Manlove, J. (2011). Trends and recent estimates: Contraceptive use among U.S. teens and young adults. Child Trends Research Brief. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Publication #2011-23.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., Block, L. G., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2006). Simply asking questions about health behaviors increases both healthy and unhealthy behaviors. Social Influence, 1, 117–127.10.1080/15534510600630850
   Google Scholar
• Zwane, A. P., Zinman, J., van Dusen, E., Pariente, W., Null, C., Miguel, E., … Banerjee, A. (2011). Being surveyed can change later behavior and related parameter estimates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 1821–1826.10.1073/pnas.1000776108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar