QCA as competing or complementary method? A qualitative comparative analysis approach to protest event data

References

• Ayoub, P. M. (2010). Repressing protest: Threat and weakness in the European context, 1975–1989. Mobilization, 15, 465–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2011). Using case‐based approaches to analyse large datasets: A comparison of Ragin’s fsQCA and fuzzy cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 31–48.10.1080/13645579.2010.483079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, C. (1995). Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression: An inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 683–713.10.2307/2111650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, C., & Soule, S. A. (2009). Velvet glove, iron fist or even hand? Protest policing in the United States, 1960–1990. Mobilization, 14(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, C., Soule, S. A., & Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Protesting while black? The differential policing of American activism, 1960 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 76, 152–178.10.1177/0003122410395370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 21, 44–68.10.1111/1467-9558.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., Soule, S. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2003). Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. American Sociological Review, 68, 581–606.10.2307/1519740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzosi, R. (2010). Quantitative narrative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., Elms, H., & Lacey, R. (2008). Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 695–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, R. (2004). A Meta-analysis of workplace ethnographies: Race, gender, and employee attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33, 4–38.10.1177/0891241603259808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida, A., Yonetani, M., & Kosaka, K. (2006). Determinants of linguistic human rights movements: An analysis of multiple causation of LHRs movements using a boolean approach. Social Forces, 84, 1937–1955.10.1353/sof.2006.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527–553.10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. (1997). Dynamics of repression and mobilization: The German extreme right in the 1990s. Mobilization, 2, 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. G. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leahey, E. (2005). Alphas and asterisks: The development of statistical significance testing standards in sociology. Social Forces, 84(1), 1–24.10.1353/sof.2005.0108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., Olzak, S., & Soule, S. A. (2009). Dynamics of collective action. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/group/collectiveaction/cgi-bin/drupal
   Google Scholar
• McPhail, C., Schweingruber, D., & McCarthy, J. (1998). Policing protest in the US: 1960–1995. In D. Della Porta & H. Reiter (Eds.), Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies (pp. 49–69). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, T. (2006). What you use matters: Coding protest data. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39, 281–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. E. (2008). Repression and crime control: Why social movement scholars should pay attention to mass incarceration as a form of repression. Mobilization, 13(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (1994). Constructing social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2006). The limitations of net-effects thinking. In B. Rihoux & H. Grimm (Eds.), Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis: Beyond the quantitative-qualitative divide (pp. 13–41). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/0-387-28829-5
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, A., Abrahamson, E., Starbuck, W. H., & Fidler, F. (2011). Researchers should make thoughtful assessments instead of null-hypothesis significance tests. Organization Science, 22, 1105–1120.10.1287/orsc.1100.0557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, A. B. (1998). Theoretical mechanisms and the empirical study of social processes. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 238–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511663901
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1995). To explain political processes. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1594–1610.10.1086/ajs.1995.100.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar