Reflections on the value of ethnographic re-studies: learning from the past

References

• Arensberg, C., & Kimball, S. (1964). Culture and community. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C., & Newby, H. (1971). Community studies. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, P. (1980). Tepoztlán reconsidered. Journal of Latin American Lore, 6, 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (1989). The value of re-studies in sociology: The case of clergy and ministers, 1971 to 1985. Sociology, 23, 31–53.10.1177/0038038589023001004
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (1994). The Mead/Freeman controversy: Some implications for qualitative researchers. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Studies in qualitative methodology (Vol. 4). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2003). Revisits: An outline of a theory of reflexive ethnography. American Sociological Review, 68, 645–679.10.2307/1519757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. G. (1981). An ethnographic study of a comprehensive school ( Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. G. (Ed.). (1982). Field research: A sourcebook and field manual. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. G. (1983). Experiencing comprehensive education: A study of Bishop McGregor school. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. (1987). Studying and re-studying Bishop McGregor school. In G. Walford (Ed.), Doing sociology of education. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., & Ragin, C. (Eds.). (2009). The sage handbook of case-based methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Caccamo, R. (2002). Back to Middletown: Three generations of sociological reflections: Three generations of sociological reflections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. (1994). A strong confirmation of the experimenters’ regress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 25, 493–503.10.1016/0039-3681(94)90063-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, G. (2002). Community studies: Fifty years of theorization. Sociological Research Online, 7, 3. Retrieved from www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/7/3
   Google Scholar
• Crow, G. (2012). Community re-studies: Lessons and prospects. The Sociological Review, 60, 405–420.10.1111/sore.2012.60.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, G. (2013). Going back to re-study communities: Challenges and opportunities. Progress in Development Studies, 13, 267–278.10.1177/1464993413490475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, G., & Allan, G. (1994). Community life. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G., Scudder, T., Colson, E., & Kemper, R. (Eds.). (1979). Long-term field research in social anthropology. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, R. (1990). Village on the border (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. (1994). How to avoid the experimenters’ regress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 25, 463–491.10.1016/0039-3681(94)90062-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. (1983/1984). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. (1998). The fateful hoaxing of Margaret Mead: A historical analysis of her Samoan research. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, R. (1966). Conflict in cities. In A. De Reuck & J. Knight (Eds.), Conflict in society. London: Churchill.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (1998). Reading ethnographic research (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2008). Questioning qualitative inquiry. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2014). The limits of social science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hardyck, J., & Braden, M. (1962). Prophecy fails again: A report of a failure to replicate. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 136–141.10.1037/h0048636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimans, F. (1988). Margaret Mead and Samoa. New York, NY: Brighton Video.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes’, L. (1957). A restudy of Manu’an culture: A problem in methodology ( PhD dissertation). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, L. (1987). Quest for the Real Samoa: the Mead-Freeman controversy and beyond. Massachusetts: Bergin and Harvey.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. New York, NY: Chandler.
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, L., Goodall, H., Campbell, E., & Johnson, M. (2004). The other side of Middletown: Exploring Muncie’s African American community. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. (1951). Life in a Mexican village: Tepoztlán restudied. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. (1953a/1970). Tepoztlán restudied: A critique of the folk-urban conceptualization of social change. Rural Sociology, 19, 121–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. (1953b/1970). Controls and experiments in fieldwork. In A. Kroeber (Ed.), Anthropology today. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. (1959). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. (1970). Anthropological essays. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Madge, J. (1963). The origins of scientific sociology. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Marroquín, A. (1953). Course offered at Escuela Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J., & Thomson, R. (2009). Researching social change: Qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa. New York, NY: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. (1930). Growing up in New Guinea. New York, NY: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. (1956). New lives for old: Cultural transformation – Manus, 1928–1951. New York, NY: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. (1976). Discussion: American ethnology: The role of Redfield. (other discussants: J. Collins, E. C. Hughes, & J. Griffin). In J. Murra (Ed.), American anthropology: The early years. Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society 1974, St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paddock, J. (1961). Oscar Lewis’s Mexico. Anthropological Quarterly, 34, 129–149.10.2307/3316672
   Google Scholar
• Radin, P. (1933). The method and theory of ethnology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, R. (1930). Tepoztlán: A Mexican village. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, R. (1950). A village that chose progress: Chan Kom revisited. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, R. (1953). The primitive world and its transformations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, R. (1960). The little community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rigdon, S. (1988). The culture façade: Art, science, and politics in the work of Oscar Lewis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, M. (1969). The myth of community studies. British Journal of Sociology, XX, 134–147. Reprinted in C. Bell & H. Newby (Eds.), The sociology of community. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Vidich, A., Bensman, J., & Stein, M. (Eds.). (1964). Reflections on community studies. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, C. (2004). Robert Redfield and the development of American anthropology. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, D. (1996). Heretic: Based on the life of Derek Freeman. Melbourne: Penguin.
   Google Scholar