Teaching social research methods after the critical turn: challenges and benefits of a constructivist pedagogy

References

• Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Sydney: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. P., & Esmark, A. (2007). New publics with/out democracy. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2010). The sage handbook of governance. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blalock, Jr., H. M. (1987). Some general goals in teaching statistics. Teaching Sociology, 15, 164–172.10.2307/1318031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2003). The craft of research (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226065694.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, G. S., Gillmore, G. M., Pershing, J. L., & Bates, K. A. (1998). Teaching quantitative research methods: A quasi-experimental analysis. Teaching Sociology, 26, 14–28.10.2307/1318676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2005). The critical turn to public sociology. Critical Sociology, 31, 313–326.10.1163/1569163053946291
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. (1982). What is this thing called science? St. Lucia: University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. (1983). Liberalism and sociology: LT hobhouse and political argument in England 1880–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9, 139–160.10.1177/1468794108098034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyrhauge, H. (2014). Teaching qualitative methods in social science: A problem-based learning approach. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 10, 442–455.
   Google Scholar
• Earley, M. A. (2014). A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 242–253.10.1080/13562517.2013.860105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282838.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2003). Postmodern interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.10.1023/A:1024834510939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2005). Should social science be critical? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35, 175–195.10.1177/0048393105275279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawker, J., McMillan, A., & Palermo, C. (2013). Enduring mentoring partnership: A reflective case study and recommendations for evaluating mentoring in dietetics. Nutrition & Dietetics, 70, 339–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kilburn, D., Nind, M., & Wiles, R. (2014). Learning as researchers and teachers: The development of a pedagogical culture for social science research methods? British Journal of Educational Studies, 62, 191–207.10.1080/00071005.2014.918576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33, 390–410.10.1080/0308514042000225716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leston-Bandeira, C. (2013). Methods teaching through a discipline research-oriented approach. Politics, 33, 207–219.10.1111/ponl.2013.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M., & Thacker, A. (1997). The impact of Michel Foucault on the social sciences and humanities. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marfleet, B. G., & Dille, B. J. (2005). Information literacy and the undergraduate research methods curriculum. Journal of Political Science Education, 1, 175–190.10.1080/15512160590961793
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (2002). Theories and methods in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Michrina, B. P., & Richards, C. (1996). Person to person: Fieldwork, dialogue, and the hermeneutic method. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, V. (2005). Constructing a teacher of qualitative methods: A reflection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 419–435.10.1080/1364557032000232871
   Google Scholar
• Oldland, E. (2011). Transition from clinical manager to university lecturer: A self-reflective case study. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 779–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, J. (2010). Undergraduate research-methods training in political science: A comparative perspective. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43, 121–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105, 1623–1640.10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., Saunders, C., Rainsford, E., & Thompson, E. (2014). Improving research methods teaching and learning in politics and international relations: A ‘reality show’ approach. Politics, 34, 85–97.10.1111/ponl.2014.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41, 885–899.10.1177/0038038507080443
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P. (2003). Is this the curriculum we want? Doctoral requirements and offerings in methods and methodology. Political Science and Politics, 36, 379–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, L. (2014). “Digging deep”: Self-study as a reflexive approach to improving my practice as an artist, researcher and teacher. Perspectives in Education: Self-Study of Educational Practice: Re-Imagining our Pedagogies, 32, 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Spigner-Littles, D. A., & Chalon, E. (1999). Constructivism: A paradigm for older learners. Educational Gerontology, 25, 203–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, G., Naidu, S., Jegede, O., & Austin, J. (2001). Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: An exploratory investigation. Learning and Instruction, 11, 87–111.10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00017-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, C., Garner, M., & Kawulich, B. (2011). The state of the art of teaching research methods in the social sciences: Towards a pedagogical culture. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 75–88.10.1080/03075070903452594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Victoria: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, H. (2013). Constructive learning and the design of a tourism postgraduate research methods module. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 13, 52–74.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2013). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. New York, NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar