Method and Measurement in Sociology, fifty years on

References

• Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 304–325.10.1177/107780049700300304
   Google Scholar
• Baker C. D. (2001). Ethnomethodological analysis of interviews. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 777–796). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicourel, A. V. (1964). Method and measurement in sociology. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicourel, A. V. (1968). The social organization of juvenile justice. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cicourel, A. V. (1974). Theory and method in a study of argentine fertility. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cicourel, A. V., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1963). The educational decision-makers. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. (1992). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., Tolmie, P., & Rouncefield, M. (2013). Cooking for pleasure. In P. Tolmie & M. Rouncefield (Eds.), Ethnomethodology at play (pp. 21–52). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967/1997). Practical sociological reasoning: Some features in the work of the Los Angeles suicide prevention center. In M. Travers & J. F. Manzo (Eds.), Law in action: Ethnomethodological & conversation analytic approaches to law (pp. 25–41). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s programme: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism (A. W. Rawls, ed.). Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17.10.2307/2095141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2004). International comparisons of student attainment: Some issues arising from the PISA study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 319–330.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2014). Using league table rankings in public policy formation: Statistical issues. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 1, 385–399.10.1146/annurev-statistics-022513-115615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C., Mair, M., & Sharrock, W. (2011). From methodology to methodography: A study of qualitative and quantitative reasoning in practice. Methodological Innovations Online, 6, 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hester, S., & Francis, D. (1994). Doing data: The local organization of a sociological interview. The British Journal of Sociology, 45, 675–695.10.2307/591889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housley, W., & Smith, R. J. (2011). Telling the CAQDAS code: Membership categorization and the accomplishment of ‘coding rules’ in research team talk. Discourse Studies, 13, 417–434.10.1177/1461445611403258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsuse, J., & Cicourel, A. (1963). A note of the uses of official statistics. Social Problems, 11, 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, K. (2013). More studies in ethnomethdology. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1991). Method: Measurement – ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 77–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., Livingston, E., & Garfinkel, H. (1983). Temporal order in laboratory life. In K. D. KnorrCetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 205–238). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday life and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1, G. Jefferson, ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444328301
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41, 885–899.10.1177/0038038507080443
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1953). Common-sense and Scientific Interpretation in Human Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1954). Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences. Journal of Philosophy, 51, 257–272.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2010). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D. (2005). Benchmarking in universities: League tables revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 31, 353–371.10.1080/03054980500221975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Witzel, A., & Mey, G. (2004). I am NOT opposed to quantification or formalization or modeling, but do not want to pursue quantitative methods that are not commensurate with the research phenomena addressed. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 5(3), 41. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0403412
   Google Scholar