Email subject lines and response rates to invitations to participate in a web survey and a face-to-face interview: the sound of silence

References

• Aikat, D., & Remund, D. (2012). Of time magazine, 24/7 media, and data deluge: The evolution of information overload theories and concepts. In J. N. Strother, J. M. Ulijin, & Z. Fazal (Eds.), Information overload: An international challenge for professional engineers and technical communicators (pp. 13–40). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22, 887–906.10.1287/orsc.1100.0573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, S., & Smith, A. D. (2006). Improving survey response rates from chief executive officers in small firms: The importance of social networks. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30, 83–96.10.1111/etap.2006.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139–1160.10.1177/0018726708094863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosnjak, M., Neubarth, W., Couper, M. P., Bandilla,  W., & Kaczmirek, L. (2008). Prenotification in web-based access panel surveys: The influence of mobile text messaging versus e-mail on response rates and sample composition. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M., Joyce, E., Kim, T., Anand, V., & Kraut, R. (2007). Introductions and requests: Rhetorical strategies that elicit response in online communities. Proceedings of the third communities and technologies conference, Michigan State University.  London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Callegaro, M., Kruse, Y., Thomas, M., & Nukulkij, P. (2009). The effect of e-mail invitation customization on survey completion rates in an internet panel: A meta-analysis of 10 public affairs surveys. Proceedings of the AAPOR-JSM conference, American Statistical Association.  Hollywood, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbish, L., & Kraut, R. (2006). Email overload at work: An analysis of factors associated with email strain. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2006,  (pp. 431–440). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, W. J., Jr. (2003). Raising response rates in mail surveys of small business owners: Results of an experiment. Journal of Small Business Management, 41, 278–295.10.1111/1540-627X.00082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Gallegos, J. G., & Frey, J. H. (1976). Reducing refusal rates for telephone interviews. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 66–78.10.1086/268268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, W. O., & S. T. Lewycky (2011). Participant recruitment in an online world: Using blog comments and forum posts, Winnipeg, University of Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Fallows, D. (2002). Email at work. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J., Cormack, G. V., & Heckerman, D. (2007). Spam and the ongoing battle for the inbox. Communications of the ACM, 50, 24–33.10.1145/1216016
   Google Scholar
• Goritz, A. S. (2004). Recruitment for online access panels. International Journal of Market Research, 46, 411–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 475–495.10.1086/269338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., & Pedersen, R. T. (2012). Efficiency of different recruitment strategies for web panels. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 238–249.10.1093/ijpor/edr020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, J. D. (2008). Email overload in academia. Rochester Institute of Technology, ProQuest. PhD,  Henrietta.
   Google Scholar
• Jerejian, A., Reid, C., & Rees, C. S. (2013). The contribution of email volume, email management strategies and propensity to worry in predicting email stress among academics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 991–996.10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, M., & Skinner, H. (2005). Challenges of internet recruitment: A case study with disappointing results. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7, e6.10.2196/jmir.7.1.e6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98.10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, S., & Soman, D. (2002). Managing the power of curiosity for effective web advertising strategies. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 1–14.10.1080/00913367.2002.10673672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, M. X., Doku, V., & Tennakoon, L. (2003). Challenges in recruitment of research participants. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9, 229–238.10.1192/apt.9.3.229
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2005). E-mail subject lines and their effect on web survey viewing and response. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 380–387.10.1177/0894439305275912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaresma, R. F. C., Silva, P. R. d., & Marreiros, C. G. (2013). E-mail usage practices in an organizational context: A study with portuguese workers. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 10, 5–20.10.4301/S1807-17752013000100001
   Google Scholar
• Rennecker, J., & Derks, D. (2013). Email overload: Fine-tuning the research lens. In D. Derks & A. B. Bakker (Eds.), The psychology of digital media at work (pp. 1–11). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sappleton, N. (2013). Advancing research methods with new technologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-3918-8
   Google Scholar
• Siu, N., Iverson, L., & Tang, A. (2006). Going with the flow: Email awareness and task management. Proceedings of ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Banff, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Skogs, J. (2013). Subject line preferences and other factors contributing to coherence and interaction in student discussion forums. Computers & Education, 60(1), 172–183.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Spitz, G. (2010). Is everyone online yet and can we survey them there? Travel Forecasting, 2, 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Szóstek, A. M. (2011). Dealing with my emails: Latent user needs in email management. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 723–729.10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, E. C., & Brown, R. F. (2011). A comparison of internet-based participant recruitment methods: Engaging the hidden population of cannabis users in research. Journal of Research Practice, 7, D2.
   Google Scholar
• The Radicati Group. (2011). Email statistics report 2011–2015. Palo Alto, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The Radicati Group. (2013). Email statistics report, 2013–2017. Palo Alto, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, J., Dabbish, L., & Kraut, R. (2011). Should I open this email? Inbox-level cues, curiosity and attention to email. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, CA, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, A. D., & Ragsdell, G. (2012). The impact of e-mail on work–life balance. Aslib Proceedings, 64, 154–177.10.1108/00012531211215178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, S., Matthews, T., Cerruti, J., Badenes,  H., & Tang, T. (2011). Am I wasting my time organizing email? A study of email refinding. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar