Transcribing screen-capture data: the process of developing a transcription system for multi-modal text-based data

References

• Antaki, C. (2011). CA tutorial: Transcription. Retrieved March 23, 2015, from http://homepages.lboro.ac.uk/~ssca1/transintro1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, M., MacMillan, K., & Brown, S. D. (2004). It’s a scream: Professional hearing and tape fetishism. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 349–374.10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avital, S., & Streeck, J. (2011). Terra incognita: Social interaction among blind children. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 169–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K. (2009). The emergence of on-line community. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 35–68). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beisswenger, M. (2008). Situated chat analysis as a window to the user’s perspective: Aspects of temporal and sequential organization. 5 ( Article 6). Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1532
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J. (2014). Multi-modal transcription: A case study. In S. Norris & C. D. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, images and texts: A reader in multimodality (pp. 155–170). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Mavers, D. (2011). Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 191–206.10.1080/13645579.2011.563616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, I., & de Roock, R. (2013). Capturing the sociomateriality of digital literacy events. Research in Learning Technology, 21. Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/21281. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21.21281
   Google Scholar
• Bird, C. M. (2005). How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 226–248.10.1177/1077800404273413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1439–1465.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, N. S. (2005). Receiving social support online: An analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 580–584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12, 419–442.10.1177/1461445610370126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, C. (2009). Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2005). Conversation analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 71–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., Walker, T., & Ogden, R. (2013). Self-repair and action construction. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 71–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J. W. (1991). Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics, 1, 71–106.10.1075/prag
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. (2003). The transcription of discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 321–348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 337–367.10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses and the achievement of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 372–302.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62, 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633.10.1525/aa.1994.96.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18, 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2010). Reproducing or constructing? Some questions about transcription in social research. Qualitative Research, 10, 553–569.10.1177/1468794110375230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2011). Gesture and institutional interaction. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 276–288). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2013). Transcription. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57–76). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (n.d.). Advice on setting up a word document for transcription. Retrieved July 24, 2014, from http://www.paultenhave.nl/Transcription%20-%20WORD.html
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/enhanced/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x/
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4, Article 1. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H. (2011). Data collection and transcription in discourse analysis: A technological history. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 9–21). London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, E., & Sunakawa, C. (2011). “A full inspiration tray”: Multimodality across real and virtual spaces. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 194–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lapadat, J. C. (2000). Problematizing transcription: Purpose, paradigm and quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 203–219.10.1080/13645570050083698
   Google Scholar
• Lapadat, J. C., & Lindsay, A. C. (1998, April 13–17). Examining transcription: A theory-laden methodology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lapadat, J. C., & Lindsay, A. C. (1999). Transcription in research and practice: From standardization of technique to interpretive positionings. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 64–86.10.1177/107780049900500104
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. (in press). Captures and blow-ups: On finally being able to read video recordings.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J. (in press). Affordances and practices: The use of screen-capture data to understand disrupted turn adjacency in instant messaging interaction. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J., & Potter, J. (2014). Conversation analysis and electronic interactions: Methodological, analytic and technical considerations. In H. Lim & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Innovative methods and technologies for electronic discourse analysis (pp. 370–393). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J., & Stokoe, E. (2014). Repair: Comparing Facebook ‘chat’ with spoken interaction. Discourse & Communication, 8, 181–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, N., & Damico, J. S. (2002). A transcription toolkit: Theoretical and clinical considerations. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16, 299–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics. (pp. 42–72) London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281–307.10.1191/1478088705qp045oa
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, E., & Stokoe, E. (2014). The order of ordering: Requests, objects and embodied conduct in a public bar. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heineman, & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, F., & Robinson, J. D. (2004). Interobserver agreement on first-stage conversation analytic transcription. Human Communication Research, 30, 376–410.10.1111/hcre.2004.30.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in society, 29, 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (n.d.). Transcription module. Retrieved March 23, 2015, from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/schegloff/TranscriptionProject/
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Hollway, W., & Mishler, E. G. (2005). Commentaries on Potter and Hepburn, ‘Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 309–325.10.1191/1478088705qp046cm
   Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar