Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: some implications for rapport

References

• Barr, P. N. (2013, December 27). Does skype help or hinder communication. The conversation. Retrieved February 3, 2015, from http://theconversation.com/does-skype-help-or-hinder-communication-21121
   Google Scholar
• Boden, D., & Molotch, H. L. (1994). The compulsion of proximity. In R. Friedland, & D. Boden (Eds.), Now here: Space, time and modernity (pp. 257–286). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), MacArthur foundation series on digital learning – youth, identity, and digital media volume (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, J. Y. (2014). When boys become boys: Development, relationships and masculinity. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14, 603–616.10.1177/1468794113488126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncombe, J., & Jessop, J. (2012). “Doing rapport” and the ethics of “faking friendship”. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Ch. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. (2011). User satisfaction and user experiences with Access Grid as a medium for social science research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 355–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, L. (2010). Using email interviews: Realities toolkit # 09 Retrieved September 1, 2010, from http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/realities/resources/toolkits/email-interviews/09-toolkit-email-interviews.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1956). The Presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. New York, NY: Harper Row.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1983). Interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, M. (2011). Work’s intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Heggen, K. (2009). Rapport and respect: Negotiating ethical relations between researcher and participant. Med Health Care Philos, 12, 291–299.10.1007/s11019-008-9165-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, P. (2012). Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: A research note. Qualitative Research, 12, 239–242.10.1177/1468794111426607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay-Gibson, N. (2009). Interviews via VoIP: Benefits and disadvantages within a PhD study of SMEs. Library and Information Research, 33, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D., & Vogel, C. (2003). Internet research methods: A practical guide for the social and behavioural sciences. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209298
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857020277
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2005). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2008). The internet and research methods. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 304–320). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• James, N., & Busher, H. (2012). Internet interviewing. In J. Gubrium, J. Holstein, A. Marvasti, & K. McKinney (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research (2nd ed.) (pp. 177–191). New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, J. (1992). Communication, rapport and the interview: A social perspective. Communication Theory, 2, 148–156.10.1111/comt.1992.2.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, S. (2009). Qualitative research: Good decision making through understanding people, cultures and markets. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative Research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: “Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and skype video calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 399–429.10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209281
   Google Scholar
• Manning, P. (1992). Erving goffman and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Sinanan, J. (2014). Webcam. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42, 837–855.10.1177/0038038508094565
   Google Scholar
• Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing and Health, 31, 391–398.10.1002/nur.v31:4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, R. (2012). ‘Recruiting and sustaining sample populations over time: Possibilities and challenges’, timescapes methods guides series, guide No. 3
   Google Scholar
• Rettie, R. (2009). Mobile phone communication: Extending goffman to mediated interaction. Sociology, 43, 421–438.10.1177/0038038509103197
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. (2012). Sociology: An introduction. Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Roulston, K. (2014). Interactional problems in research interviews. Qualitative Research, 14, 277–293.10.1177/1468794112473497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saumure, K., & Given, L. (n.d.). Using skype as a research tool: Lessons learned from qualitative interviews with distance students in a teacher-librarianship program. Retrieved May 31, 2015, from http://lrsv.umd.edu/abstracts/Saumure_Given.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seitz, S. (2015). Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: A research note. Qualitative Research, early online publication, 16, 229–235.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. R. (2012). Skype: An appropriate method of data collection for qualitative interviews? The Hilltop Review, 6, 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S. (2012). Evolving creativity in qualitative longitudinal research with children and teenagers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 119–133.10.1080/13645579.2012.649412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, S. (2015). The potentials and pitfalls of using Skype for qualitative (longitudinal) interviews. (NCRM Working Paper). NCRM. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3757/
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S., & Edwards, R. with Stephenson, R. (2011) Researching children’s lateral relationships over time: methodological & ethical lessons from a qualitative longitudinal study. (Families & Social Capital Research Group Working Paper No. 30). London: London South Bank University.
   Google Scholar