Exploring relational engagement practices in stroke rehabilitation using the Voice Centred Relational Approach

References

• Bright F. A. S.(2016). Reconceptualising engagement: A relational practice with people experiencing communication disability after stroke. (Doctoral thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10292/9754
   Google Scholar
• Bright, F. A. S., Kayes, N. M., Worrall, L., & McPherson, K. M. (2015). A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation, 37, 643–654. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.933899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, F. A. S., Kayes, N. M., Cummins, C., Worrall, L., & McPherson, K. M. (2017). Co-constructing engagement in stroke rehabilitation: A qualitative study exploring how practitioner engagement can influence patient engagement. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1–10. doi:10.1177/0269215517694678
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breckenbridge, J. P. (2016). The reflexive role of tanka poetry in domestic abuse research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21, 447–460. doi:10.1177/1744987116649635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. M., Debold, E., Tappen, M., & Gilligan, C. (1991). Reading narratives of conflict and choice for self and moral voice: A relational method. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research, and application (pp. 25–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1991). Listening for voice in narratives of relationship. New Directions for Child Development, 43–62.10.1002/(ISSN)1534-8687
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674731837
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1993). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development. Feminism and Psychology, 3, 11–35.10.1177/0959353593031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, A., Canavan, J., & Miller, M. (2009). Participatory research and the voice centred relational method of data analysis: Is it worth it? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 67–77. doi:10.1080/13645570701606044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charon, J. M. (2010). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2013). The death of data? Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 1–4. doi:10.1177/1532708613487882
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, A. (1998). Interpreting mother-work: Linking methodology, ontology, theory and personal biography. Canadian Woman Studies, 18, 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, A., & Mauthner, N. S. (2002). Knowing responsibly: Ethics, feminist epistemologies and methodologies. In M. Birch, T. Miller, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 123–145). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, A., & Mauthner, N. S. (2008). What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the Listening Guide. Qualitative Research, 8, 399–409. doi:10.1177/1468794106093636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Weller, S. (2012). Shifting analytic ontology: Using I-poems in qualitative longitudinal research [Article]. Qualitative Research, 12, 202–217. doi:10.1177/1468794111422040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412991476
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, K. D., & al Sayah, F. (2011). Arts-based methods in health research: A systematic review of the literature. Arts & Health, 3, 110–145. doi:10.1080/17533015.2011.561357
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Retrieved from www.aut.lconz.ac.nz
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (2007). Social construction and research methodology. In W. Outhwaite & S. Turner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social science methodology (pp. 461–478). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781848607958
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C., Spencer, S. R., Weinberg, K. M., & Bertsch, T. (2005). On the listening guide: A voice-centred relational method. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Emergent methods in social research (pp. 253–271). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work. Psychiatry, 18, 213–231. doi:10.1521/00332747.1955.11023008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1996). Method in madness: Case studies in cognitive neuropsychology. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamer, M. (1999). Listen to the voice: An interview with Carol Gilligan. Women: A Cultural Review, 10, 173–184. doi:10.1080/09574049908578387
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P. J., Clark, W. M., & Ivey, D. C. (2000). Fusing horizons: Exploring qualitative research and psychotherapeutic applications of social constructionism. Contemporary Family Therapy, 22, 241–250. doi:10.1023/A:1007738021412
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Crengle, S., & McCreanor, T. (2006). How Tikanga guides and protects the research process: Insights from the Hauora Tane project. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 29, 60.
   Google Scholar
• Kiegelmann, M. (2009). Making oneself vulnerable to discovery. Carol Gilligan in conversation With Mechthild Kiegelmann. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs090234.
   Google Scholar
• Koelsch, L. E. (2012). The virtual patchwork quilt: A qualitative feminist research method [Article]. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 823–829. doi:10.1177/1077800412456957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontos, P. C., & Poland, B. D. (2009). Mapping new theoretical and methodological terrain for knowledge translation: Contributions from critical realism and the arts. Implementation Science, 4, 868–10. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljundberg, M., Yendol-Hoppey, D., Smith, J. J., & Hayes, S. B. (2009). (E)pistemological awareness, instantiation of methods, and uninformed methodological ambiguity in qualitative research projects. Educational Researcher, 38, 687–699. doi:10.3102/0013189X09351980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimer, J. (2000). The conduct of care: Understanding nursing practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Latimer, J. (2008). Critical constructionism in nursing research. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 153–170). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (1998). Reflections on a voice-centred relational method of data analysis: Analysing maternal and domestic voices. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: Private lies and public texts (pp. 119–144). London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209137
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data. Sociology, 37, 413–431. doi:10.1177/00380385030373002
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling research. Journal of Counseling Research, 52, 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., Coulehan, J., Thorne, S., Bottorff, J. L., Cheek, J., & Kuzel, A. J. (2009). Data expressions or expressing data. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1035–1036. doi:10.1177/1049732309338719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M., & Vinha, H. (2016). Creative interactions with data: Using visual and metaphorical devices in repeated focus groups. Qualitative Research, 16, 9–26. doi:10.1177/1468794114557993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nortvedt, P., Hem, M., & Skirbekk, H. (2011). The ethics of care: Role obligations and moderate partiality in healthcare. Nursing Ethics, 18, 192–200. doi:10.1177/0969733010388926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, S., Byng, S., Gilpin, S., & Ireland, C. (1997). Talking about aphasia. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrovic, S., Lordly, D., Brigham, S., & Delaney, M. (2015). Learning to listen: An analysis of applying the Listening Guide to reflection papers. International Journal of Qualitaive Methods, 1–11, doi:10.1177/1609406915621402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, K., & Schultz, A. S. (2014). Exploring arts-based knowledge translation: Sharing research findings through performing the patterns, rehearsing the results, staging the synthesis. Worldviews of Evidence Based Nursing, 11, 133–139. doi:10.111/wvn.12031
   Google Scholar
• Sorsoli, L., & Tolman, D. L. (2008). Hearing voices: Listening for multiplicity and movement in interview data. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 495–515). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (1995). Care as a basis for radical political judgements. Hypatia, 10, 141–149.10.1111/hypa.1995.10.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, C. (2010). The listening guide for coaching: Exploring qualitative, relational, voice-centered, evidence based methodology for coaches. Coaching, 3, 144–154. doi:10.1080/17521882.2010.497766
   Google Scholar