What was I thinking? A theoretical framework for analysing panel conditioning in attitudes and (response) behaviour

References

• Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412993869
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Axinn, W. G., Jennings, E. A., & Couper, M. P. (2015). Response of sensitive behaviors to frequent measurement. Social Science Research, 49, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, J. S., Gatny, H. H., Kusunoki, Y., & Schulz, P. (2016). Effects of intensive longitudinal data collection on pregnancy and contraceptive use. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(2), 205–222. doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.979717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 637–653. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, M. (2015). Panel conditioning. Wirkungsmechanismen und Konsequenzen wiederholter Befragungen [Panel conditioning. Underlying mechanisms and consequences of repeated interviewing]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Bizer, G. Y., Tormala, Z. L., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitude strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 646–653. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, R. G., Reeder, L. G., Kanouse, D., Kinder, D. R., Nagy, V. T., & Judd, C. M. (1977). Interviewing changes attitudes – Sometimes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41(1), 56–64. doi:10.1086/268352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Reinartz, W. J. (2004). The short- and long-term effects of measuring intent to repurchase. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 566–572. doi:10.1086/425091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, A. R. (1968). Response validity: Vote report. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(4), 588–606. doi:10.1086/267648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi, L. P. (1948). The interview effect in polling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(1), 99–111. doi:10.1086/265924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, T. F., de Bresser, J., Delaney, L., & Winter, J. (2017). Can survey participation alter household saving behaviour? Economic Journal. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, M., Toepoel, V., & van Soest, A. (2011). Nonparametric tests of panel conditioning and attrition bias in panel surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(1), 32–56. doi:10.1177/0049124110390765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dholakia, U. M. (2010). A critical review of question-behavior effect research. Review of Marketing Research, 7(7), 145–197. doi:10.1108/S1548-6435(2010)0000007009
   Google Scholar
• Duan, N., Alegria, M., Canino, G., McGuire, T. G., & Takeuchi, D. (2007). Survey conditioning in self-reported mental health service use: Randomized comparison of alternative instrument formats. Health Services Research, 42(2), 890–907. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00618.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagle, D. E., & Proeschold-Bell, R. J. (2015). Methodological considerations in the use of name generators and interpreters. Social Networks, 40, 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Chen, J.-M., McDonel, E. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(4), 339–357. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(82)90058-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–238. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, D., & Holmberg, S. (1992). The Hawthorne effect in election studies: The impact of survey participation on voting. British Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 240–247. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006359
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Carnot, C. G., Beach, R., & Young, B. (1987). Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 315–318. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern-Manners, A., Warren, J. R., & Torche, F. (2014). Panel conditioning in a longitudinal study of illicit behaviors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(3), 565–590. doi:10.1093/poq/nfu029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagodzinski, W., Kühnel, S. M., & Schmidt, P. (1987). Is there a “socratic effect” in nonexperimental panel studies? Consistency of an attitude toward guestworkers. Sociological Methods & Research, 15(3), 259–302. doi:10.1177/0049124187015003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (1995). Repetition and evaluative extremity. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 43–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-Y., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2010). A computational model of the citizen as motivated reasoner: Modeling the dynamics of the 2000 presidential election. Political Behavior, 32(1), 1–28. doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9099-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroh, M., Winter, F., & Schupp, J. (2016). Using person-fit measures to assess the impact of panel conditioning on reliability. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(4), 914–942. doi:10.1093/poq/nfw025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. doi: 08884080/91/030213-24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1940). “Panel” studies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 4(1), 122–128. doi:10.1086/265373
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & McGraw, K. M. (1991). Where is the schema? Critiques. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1357–1380.10.2307/1963950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, C. B. (2005). Unintentional voter mobilization: Does participation in preelection surveys increase voter turnout? ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601(1), 155–168. doi:10.1177/0002716205278151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz, N. A., & Lair, T. J. (1994). Getting better? Change or error in the measurement of functional limitations. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 20(3), 237–262. doi:10.3233/JEM-1994-20305
   Google Scholar
• Morwitz, V. G., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2004). The mere-measurement effect: Why does measuring intentions change actual behavior? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 64–74. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morwitz, V. G., Johnson, E., & Schmittlein, D. (1993). Does measuring intent change behavior? Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 46–61. doi:10.1086/209332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancarrow, C., & Cartwright, T. (2007). Online access panels and tracking research: The conditioning issue. International Journal of Market Research, 49(5), 573–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 747–766. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roßmann, J. (2017). Satisficing in Befragungen. Theorie, Messung und Erklärung [Satisficing in surveys. Theory, measurement and explanation]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.10.1007/978-3-658-16668-7
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, A. M., O’Brien, N., French, D. P., Glidewell, L., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2015). The question-behavior effect: Genuine effect or spurious phenomenon? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analyses. Health Psychology, 34(1), 61–78. doi:10.1037/hea0000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifeling, T. A., Cheng, C., Reiter, J. P., & Hillygus, D. S. (2015). Accounting for nonignorable unit nonresponse and attrition in panel studies with refreshment samples. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 3(3), 265–295. doi:10.1093/jssam/smv007
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, S. J. (1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 211–221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberstein, A. R., & Jacobs, C. A. (1989). Symptoms of repeated interview effects in the consumer expenditure interview survey. In D. Kasprzyk, G. J. Duncan, G. Kalton, & M. P. Singh (Eds.), Panel surveys (pp. 289–303). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. K., Gerber, A. S., & Orlich, A. (2003). Self-prophecy effects and voter turnout: An experimental replication. Political Psychology, 24(3), 593–604. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, E. (1997). Increasing health club attendance through self-prophecy. Marketing Letters, 8(1), 23–31. doi:10.1023/A:1007977025902
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, E., & Greenwald, A. G. (1999). Social influence by requesting self-prophecy. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 61–89. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0801_03
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, E., Kareklas, I., Devezer, B., & Sprott, D. E. (2016). A meta-analytic synthesis of the question-behavior effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 441–458. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, E., & Obermiller, C. (1996). To cheat or not to cheat: Reducing cheating by requesting self-prophecy. Marketing Education Review, 6(3), 95–103. doi:10.1080/10528008.1996.11488565
   Google Scholar
• Steinbrecher, M., Roßmann, J., & Bergmann, M. (2013). The short-term campaign panel of the German longitudinal election study 2009: Design, implementation, data preparation, and archiving. GESIS – Technical Reports 2013/20. Köln: GESIS.
   Google Scholar
• Struminskaya, B. (2016). Respondent conditioning in online panel surveys: Results of two field experiments. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 95–115. doi:10.1177/0894439315574022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., Allum, N., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2009). Attitudes over time: The psychology of panel conditioning. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys (pp. 113–126). Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743874
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 289–338. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60010-6
   Google Scholar
• Toepoel, V., Das, M., & van Soest, A. (2008). Effects of design in web surveys comparing trained and fresh respondents. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 985–1007. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toepoel, V., Das, M., & van Soest, A. (2009). Relating question type to panel conditioning: Comparing trained and fresh respondents. Survey Research Methods, 3(2), 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819322
   Google Scholar
• Warren, J. R., & Halpern-Manners, A. (2012). Panel conditioning in longitudinal social science surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 491–534. doi:10.1177/0049124112460374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, J., & Lievesley, D. (1987). Attrition in a panel study of attitudes. Journal of Official Statistics, 3(3), 267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, J., & Lievesley, D. (1989). Evidence of conditioning effects in the British social attitudes panel. In D. Kasprzyk, G. J. Duncan, G. Kalton, & M. P. Singh (Eds.), Panel surveys (pp. 319–339). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilding, S., Conner, M., Sandberg, T., Prestwich, A., Lawton, R., Wood, C., … Sheeran, P. (2016). The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 196–230. doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1245940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T., & Eckman, S. (2012). Panel conditioning: Change in true value versus change in self-report. In Proceedings of the Survey Methods Research Section (pp. 4726–4736). Alexandria, VA: ASA.
   Google Scholar