IJSRM’s 100th issue

References

• Aaltonen, S. (2017). Challenges in gaining and re-gaining informed consent among young people on the margins of education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(4), 329–341.10.1080/13645579.2016.1170412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannen, J., & Edwards, R. (1998). Editorial. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(1), 1–6.10.1080/13645579.1998.10846859
   Google Scholar
• Brunton-Smith, I., & Tarling, R. (2017). Harnessing paradata and multilevel multiple imputation when analysing survey data: A case study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 709–720.10.1080/13645579.2017.1287842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christakis, N. (2013, July 19). Let’s shake up the social sciences. The New York Times. Retrieved October 2, 2017 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/opinion/sunday/lets-shake-up-the-social-sciences.html
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2016). Exploring the robustness of set theoretic findings from a large n fsQCA: An illustration from the sociology of education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(4), 445–459.10.1080/13645579.2015.1033799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. R. S. (2013). Clustering in the field of social sciences: That is your choice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(5), 403–428.10.1080/13645579.2012.716973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. J., Roberts, G., Doyle, L. W., Anderson, P. J., & Carlin, J. B. (2016). Multiple imputation for missing data in a longitudinal cohort study: A tutorial based on a detailed case study involving imputation of missing outcome data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(5), 575–591.10.1080/13645579.2015.1126486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, L. F., O’Dwyer, M., & Gabe, J. (2013). Seeking university research ethics committee approval: The emotional vicissitudes of a ``rationalised’ process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(1), 65–80.10.1080/13645579.2011.649902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, N. (2012). The politics and ethics of naming: Questioning anonymisation in (archival) research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(4, SI), 331–340.10.1080/13645579.2012.688330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–99.10.1177/0038038507080443
   Google Scholar
• Sharland, E., Holland, P., Henderson, M., Zhang, M. Le, Cheung, S. Y., & Scourfield, J. (2017). Assembling life history narratives from quantitative longitudinal panel data: What’s the story for families using social work? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 667–679.10.1080/13645579.2017.1279915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, L. (in press).Mixed methods research: A method for complex systems. In E. Mitleton-Kelly, A. Paraskevas, & C. Day (Eds.), Edward Elgar handbook of research methods in complexity science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeylen, S., & Clark, G. (2017). An alternative ethics for research: Levinas and the unheard voices and unseen faces. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, s20(5), 499–512. 10.1080/13645579.2016.1220117
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I., (2000, September 14). The racist albatross: Social science, Jorg Haider, and Widerstand. Eurozine, the Netmagazine. Retrieved October 15, 2017, from https://www.iwallerstein.com/the-racist-albatros/
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., Crow, G., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2008). The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 417–428.10.1080/13645570701622231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T., & Gemperle, S. M. (2017). Sequence will tell! Integrating temporality into set-theoretic multi-method research combining comparative process tracing and qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 121–135.10.1080/13645579.2016.1149316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar