Aligning theory and methodology in mixed methods research: Before Design Theoretical Placement

References

• Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546. Retrieved from http://polisci.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/people/u3827/APSR2001-Validity.pdf10.1017/S0003055401003100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, M. (2013). Structural equation modeling (SEM) in health sciences education researches: An overview of the method and its application. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 13(6), 519–530. Retrieved from http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-2228-en.html
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., & Irajpour, A (2011). Investigating the Indicators of nursing students’ clinical competency: Clinical nursing teachers viewpoints in Isfahan university of medical sciences (Unpublished report). Research ID: 290129. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M, & Irajpour, A. (2014). Optimum characteristics of nursing students’ clinical evaluation: Clinical nursing teachers’ viewpoints in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 13(10), 796–808. Retrieved from http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-2876-fa.html
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M., Irajpour, A., Abdoli, S., & SaberiZafarghandi, M. B. (2012). Clients as mediators of interprofessional collaboration in mental health services in Iran. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(1), 36–42.10.3109/13561820.2011.623803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald, M. M., Radil, A. I., Zhang, X., & Hanson, W. E. (2015). Current mixed methods practices in qualitative research: A content analysis of leading journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(2), 5–33.10.1177/160940691501400205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnault, D., & Fetters, M. D. (2011). RO1 funding for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 309–329. doi:10.1177/1558689811416481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. M. (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. Singapore: SAGE.10.4135/9780857024329
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10.10.2307/2088165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boateng, R. (2014). Research made easy. Accra: Pearl Richards Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 605–634. Retrieved from http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~brian/905-2009/all-papers/Bollen-annurev.psych.53.100901.pdf10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 265. doi:10.1037/a0024448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, M., Hunt, G. E., & Horsfall, J. (2011). Turning mental health nursing problems into quality or research projects. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 32(4), 228–233.10.3109/01612840.2010.547655
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Bestpractices for mixed methods research in the health sciences (pp. 2094–2103). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, L., & Nunez-Smith, M. (2014). Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.  
   Google Scholar
• De Lisle, J. (2011). The benefits and challenges of mixing methods and methodologies: Lessons learnt from implementing qualitatively led mixed methods research designs in Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Curriculum, 18, 87–120. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2139/11308
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270–283.10.1177/1558689808316807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, B. C., Coon, D. W., & Ume, E. (2011). Use of theoretical frameworks as a pragmatic guide for mixed methods studies Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 276–292. doi:10.1177/1558689811412972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everest, T. (2014). Resolving the qualitative-quantitative debate in healthcare research. Medical Practice and Reviews, 5(1), 6–15. doi:10.5897/MPR.2013.0107
   Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015a). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. doi:10.1177/1558689815581222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015b). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213. doi:10.1177/1558689815594687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, M., Wagner, C., & Kawulich, B., (Eds.). (2009). Teaching research in the social sciences (1st ed.). Burlington, VI: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative inquiry. Chicago, IL: Aldin.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G. (2013). Describing mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 141–151. doi:10.1177/1558689812461179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. (2015). Mixed methods research. Qualitative Health Research, 25(6), 775–788.10.1177/1049732315580558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Johnson, R. B. (2013). Coming at things differently. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 103–109. doi:10.1177/1558689813483987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Johnson, R. B. (2015). The oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (1997). From theoretical concept to survey question. In Lars Lyberg & Paul Biemer (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 45–46). New York, NY: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118490013.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Irajpour, A., Alavi, M., Abdoli, S., & Saberizafarghandi, M. B. (2009). Investigating the structure of IPC in the Iranian mental health services (Unpublished report). Research ID: 389116, Isfahan University of medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Irajpour, A., Alavi, M., Abdoli, S., & Saberizafarghandi, M. B. (2012). Challenges of interprofessional collaboration in Iranian mental health services: A qualitative investigation. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 17(2 Suppl), S171–S177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. doi:10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettles, A. M., Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2011). Mixed methods research in mental health nursing. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18(6), 535–542.10.1111/jpm.2011.18.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavery, G. D. (2014). African political party development and the limits of institutional engineering (Order No. 3631487). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1566193150). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1566193150
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584.10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormond, J. E. (2016). Practice research: Planning and delivering (11th ed.). London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Llahana, S. V. (2005). A Theoretical framework for clinical specialist nursing: An example from diabetes. Salisbury: APS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luyt, R. (2012). A framework for mixing methods in quantitative measurement development, validation, and revision. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 294–316. doi:10.1177/1558689811427912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson, M. J., & Rainer Jr, R. K. (2009). The nomological network and the research continuum. Retrieved from http://www.irma-international.org/viewtitle/13990/
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, H. (2006). Nursing theories and models. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2011). Mixed methods as tools for social change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(3), 195–197. doi:10.1177/1558689811418095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 48–76.10.1177/2345678906292462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing qualitative research. In Y. Lincoln & N. Denzin (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative inquiry (pp. 220–235). Menlo Park, CA: Sage. (Reprinted in Y. Lincoln & N. Denzin (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 56-85). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2012). Qualitative health research: Creating a new discipline. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nevid, J. (2012). Essentials of psychology: Concepts and applications. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., Ridenour, C. S., Newman, C., Smith, S., & Brown, R. C. (2013). Detecting low incidents effects: The value of mixed methods research designs in low-n studies. Mid-Western educational researcher, 25(4), 31–46. Retrieved from https://education.fiu.edu/ogs/docs/brown_bag_sept/Introduction%20to%20Type%20V1%20Error/Detecting%20Low%20Incidents%20Effects%20(Newman%20et%20al.).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, A.C. (2011). Defining the nomological network of impression management. Retrieved from http://csuchico-dspace.calstate.edu/handle/10211.4/328
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13645570500402447#.VkrNidIrKM810.1080/13645570500402447
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 17(28), 1–28. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17/onwuegbuzie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orchard, C., Bainbridge, L., Bassendowski, S., Stevenson, K., Wagner, S. J., Weinberg, L., & Sawatsky-Girling, B. (2010). A national interprofessional competency framework. Retrieved from http://www.cihc.ca/files/CIHC_IPCompetencies_Feb1210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., & Rowa-Dewar, N. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3), 369383. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, W. (2007). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts, methodology. Handbook of Child Psychology. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0102/asset/chpsy0102.pdf?v=1&t=iu4pbezp&s=9984269ad2355b76909b0791b57d277534ca4fb9. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0102
   Google Scholar
• Pathirage, C. P. Amaratunga, R. D. G, & Haigh, R. P. (2005). Knowledge management research within the built environment: Research methodological perspectives. Paper presented at the 5th International Postgraduate Conference in the Built and Human Environment, The Lowry, Salford Quays, UK. Retrieved from http://usir.salford.ac.uk/9940/1/262_Pathirage_CP_KNOWLEDGE_MANAGEMENT_RESEARCH_WITHIN_THE_BUILT_ENVIRONMENT_IPRC_2005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative Research. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1993). Theory unmasked: The uses and guises of theory in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 16(3), 213–218.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolowski, J. A., & Banks, C. M. (2012). Modeling and simulation in the medical and health sciences. Singapore: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tavallaei, M., & Abu Talib, M. (2010). A general perspective on role of theory in qualitative research. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(1), 570–755.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 35–50. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2015). Agree to differ.  Paris: UNESCO Publishing and Tudor Rose.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing: Pearson new international edition (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Yvonne Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16. doi:10.1177/1558689809349691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar