References
- Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z (R. Miller, Trans.). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
- Barthes, R. (1981). The death of the author. In J. Caughie (Ed.), Theories of authorship (pp. 208–213). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Betti, E. (1980). Hermeneutics as the general method of the Geisteswissenschaften. (J. Bleicher, Trans.) In J. Bleicher (Ed.), Contemporary hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy and critique (pp. 51–94). London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ( Reprinted from Die Hermeneutik als allgemeine Methodik der Geisteswissenschaften, by E. Betti. 1962, Tübingen: Mohr).
- Darawsheh, W. (2014). Reflexivity in research: Promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 21(12), 560–568.10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.12.560
- Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of philosophy (A. Bass, Trans.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
- Derrida, J. (2001). Forgiveness: A roundtable discussion with Jacques Derrida. In J. Caputo, M. Dooley, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Questioning god (pp. 52–72). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Derrida, J. (2005). Paper machine (R. Bowlby, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary theory ( anniversary ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230.10.1177/146879410200200205
- Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in the class? The authority of interpretative communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Flick, U. (2000). Episodic interviewing. In M. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 75–92). London: Sage.
- Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
- Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method (W. Glen-Doepel, Trans.). London: Sheed and Ward.
- Gadamer, H. G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Gadamer, H. G. (1980). Dialogue and dialectic (P. Christopher Smith, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Gough, B. (2003). Deconstructing reflexivity. In O. Finlay & B. Gough (Eds.), Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences (pp. 21–36). London: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470776094
- Gough, T. (2013). Reception theory of architecture: Its pre-history and afterlife. Architectural Theory Review, 18(3), 279–292.10.1080/13264826.2013.889645
- Hall, S. (2012). Encoding/decoding. In M. Durham & D. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Key works (2nd ed.). (pp. 137–144). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
- Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. MacQuarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper and Row.
- Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Ingarden, R. (1973). The literary work of art (G. G. Grabowicz, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
- Iser, W. (1978a). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Iser, W. (1978b). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Lewis, W., & Johnson, S. (2017). Theatrical reception and the formation of twenty-first-century perception: A case study for the igeneration. Theater and Performance Studies., 27(2), 123–136.
- McCabe, J., & Holmes, D. (2009). Reflexivity, critical qualitative research and emancipation: A Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(7), 1518–1526.10.1111/jan.2009.65.issue-7
- Neville, C., Dickie, R., & Goetz, S. (2014). What’s stopping a career in gerontological nursing? Literature review. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 40(1), 18–27.10.3928/00989134-20131126-02
- Nunning, A. F. (2005). Reconceptualizing unreliable narration: Synthesizing cognitive and rhetorical approaches. In J. Phelan & P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A companion to narrative theory, Vol. 21 (pp. 89–107). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470996935
- Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Parris, D. P. (2009). Reception theory and biblical hermeneutics. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
- Pind, J. L. (2014). Edgar rubin and psychology in denmark: Figure and ground. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-01062-5
- Pope, J. (2006). A future for hypertext fiction convergence. The International Journal of Research into Media Studies, 12(4), 447–465.
- Rubin, E. (1958). Figure and ground. In D. C. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 194–203). Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
- Smyth, K. E. (2009). Enhancing the agency of the listener: Introducing reception theory in a lecture. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(2), 131–140.10.1080/03098770902856660
- Stockwell, P. (2003). Surreal figures. In J. Gavins & G. Steen (Eds.), Cognitive poetics in practice (pp. 13–26). London: Routledge.
- Van Manen, M. (1997a). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London: Althouse Press.
- Van Manen, M. (1997b). From meaning to method. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 345–369.10.1177/104973239700700303
- Van Manen, M. (2002). Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry. London: Althouse Press.
- Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure – ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.
- Zerweck, B. (2001). Historicizing unreliable narration: Unreliability and cultural discourse in narrative fiction. Style, 35(1), 151.