Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori?

References

• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? In S. E. Baker & R. Edwards (Eds.), How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research (pp. 8–11). Southampton: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Ando, H., Cousins, R., & Young, C. (2014). Achieving saturation in thematic analysis: Development and refinement of a codebook. Comprehensive Psychology, 3, 1–7. doi:10.2466/03.CP.3.4
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. Southampton: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, V. (2002). Sample survey: Principles and methods (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? In S. E. Baker & R. Edwards (Eds.), How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research (pp. 15). Southampton: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R. (2000). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. D. (2008). Historical development and defining issues of constructionist research. In J. F. Holstein & J. A. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 41–64). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, C. R. (2005). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 19, 426–432. doi:10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analyses, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 739–743. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? In S. E. Baker & R. Edwards (Eds.), How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research (pp. 18–19). Southampton: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2015). Response to Fugard and Potts: Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 689–691. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. E. Clarke (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127–154). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). (pp. 651–679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clift, R. (2016). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and principles for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., & Washburn, S. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1001–1014. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00350-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203412497
   Google Scholar
• Dukes, S. (1984). Phenomenological methodology in the human sciences. Journal of Religion and Health, 23, 197–203. doi:10.1007/BF00990785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1319–1320. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473913882
   Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2015). Themes, variables, and the limits to calculating sample size in qualitative research: A response to Fugard and Potts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 685–686. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwhistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-driven interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25, 1229–1245. doi:10.1080/08870440903194015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 669–684. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2015). Response to comments. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 693–694. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2016). ‘Shine bright like a diamond’? A reply to Braun and Clarke. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 745–746. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1205794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1408–1416 http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/9/fusch1.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, R. (2015). How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge? Journal of Building Engineering, 1, 2–12. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (2001). Social construction in context. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. K., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–122. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy, P. (2008). Doing pragmatics (3rd ed.). London: Hodder-Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 29, 3–22. doi:10.1177/1525822X16639015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagaman, A. K., & Wutich, A. (2017). How many interviews are enough to identify metathemes in multisited and cross-cultural research? Another perspective on guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) landmark study. Field Methods, 29, 23–41. doi:10.1177/1525822X16640447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with ethnography?. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2015). Sampling and thematic analysis: A response to Fugard and Potts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 687–688. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27, 591–608. doi:10.1177/1049732316665344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S. L. (1994). A theoretical model for caring with women with chronic non-malignant pain. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 94–122. doi:10.1177/104973239400400107
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, C., Nixon, A., & Wild, D. (2010). Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research. Expert Reviews in Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 10, 269–281. doi:10.1586/erp.10.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzel, A.J. (1999). Sampling in qualitative research. In B. F Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research, (2nd ed., pp. 33–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54, 11–22. doi:10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z. (2004). Monte Carlo simulation. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, Vol. 2 (pp. 662–664). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 220–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 3–5. doi:10.1177/104973200129118183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 327–344. doi:10.1080/13645570701401305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013). ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13, 190–197. doi:10.1177/1468794112446106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality and Quantity, 41, 105–121. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parse, R. R. (1990). Parse's research methodology with an illustration of the lived experience of hope. Nursing Science Quarterly, 3, 9–17. doi:10.1177/089431849000300106
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 41–60). New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4615-6989-3
   Google Scholar
• Ray, M. A. (1994). The richness of phenomenology: Philosophic, theoretic and methodologic concerns. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 117–133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., Moore, A. J., Bernard, M., Jordan, K. L., & Sim, J. (2015). Living well with chronic pain in later life: The role and meaning of activity and involvement. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 39, 200–213. doi:10.1080/01924788.2015.1063329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Elam, G., Tennant, R., & Rahim, N. (2014). Designing and selecting samples. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 111–146). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203413081
   Google Scholar
• Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., & Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313–338. doi:10.1525/aa.1986.88.2.02a00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 18, 179–183. doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2008). Theoretical saturation. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, Vol. 2 (pp. 875–876). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., … Jinks, C. (2017). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446282243
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (1985). Qualitative methodology and sociology: Describing the social world. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, V.-T., Porcher, R., Falissard, B., & Ravaud, P. (2016). Point of data saturation was assessed using resampling methods in a survey with open-ended questions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 80, 88–96. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, V.-T., Porcher, R., Tran, V.-C., & Ravaud, P. (2017). Predicting data saturation in qualitative surveys with mathematical models from ecological research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 82, 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijnsoever, F. (2015). (I can’t get no) saturation: A simulation and guidelines for minimum sample sizes in qualitative research. Research Innovation Studies Utrecht Working Paper Series 15.05. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W., Smits, L., Kotz, D., Budé, L., Spigt, M., Serroyen, J., & Crutzen, R. (2015). A simple formula for the calculation of sample sizes in pilot studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68, 1375–1379. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, C. A. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 83–101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. (2009). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar