Negotiating the ethics of Netnography: developing an ethical approach to an online study of mother perspectives

References

• Al-Sa’Di, R., & Hamdan, J. (2005). “Synchronous online chat” English: Computer mediated communication. World Englishes, 24(4), 409–424.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., & Jirotka, M. (2015). Ethical praxis in digital social research. In P. Halfpenny & R. Procter (Eds.), Innovations in digital research methods (pp. 271–296). Los Angeles: Sage International.
   Google Scholar
• Antoniadou, V., & Dooly, M. (2017). Educational ethnography in blended learning environments. In E. Moore & M. Dooly (Eds.), Qualitative approaches to research on plurilingual education (pp. 237–263). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Internet Researchers [AoIR]. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research 2.0: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Retrieved from https://aoir.org/ethics/
   Google Scholar
• Barak, A., & Miron, O. (2005). Writing characteristics of suicidal people on the internet: A psychological investigation of emerging social environments. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour, 35(5), 507–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, E., & O’Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 233–247.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, C., Forehand, R., & Zegiob, L. (1979). A review of observer reactivity in adult-child interactions. Journal of Behavioural Assessment, 1(2), 167–178.
   Google Scholar
• Bengry-Howell, A., Wiles, R., Nind, M., & Crow, G. (2011). A review of the academic impact of three methodological innovations: Netnography, child-led research and creative research methods. NCRM Working Paper Series 01/11.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, E., & Guerin, S. (2010). “Not the romantic, all happy, coochy coo experience”: A qualitative analysis of interactions on an Irish parenting web site. Family Relations, 59, 14–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA: London.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society [BPS]. (2017). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research (2017). Leicester: BPS.
   Google Scholar
• Brotsky, S., & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the “pro-ana” community: A covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15(2), 93–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruckman, A. (2004). Introduction: Opportunities and challenges in methodology and ethics. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. S. Chen, & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics (pp. 101–104). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bruckman, A., Karahalios, K., Kraut, R., Poole, E., Thomas, J., & Yardi, S. (2010). Revisiting research ethics in the Facebook era: challenges in emerging CSCW research. Proceedings from the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Savannah, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, A. (2008). Understanding and managing legal issues in internet research. In N. Fielding, R. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The sage handbook of online research methods (pp. 42–58). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P., Aram, D., & Tannenbaum, M. (2014). Forums for parents of young children: Parents’ online conversations in Israel and France. International Journal about Parents in Education, 8(1), 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Convery, I., & Cox, D. (2012). A review of research ethics in internet based research. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 6(1), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Civey-Robinson, J., & Patall, E. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a Complicated Thing. Educational Researcher, 5(8), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. (1999). Cybertalk and the method of instances. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing internet research (pp. 107–126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children Schools and Families. (2007). Homework. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218194057/http:/www.teachernet.gov.uk/managemen/atoz/h/homework/
   Google Scholar
• Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievements and adjustments: A literature review. Nottingham: DfES Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., Schroeder, R., & Fry, J. (2009). New techniques in online research: Challenges for research ethics. Twenty-First Century Society, 4(2), 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Farrow, S., Tymms, P., & Henderson, B. (1999). Homework and attainment in primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Fernback, J. (2002). The individual within the collective: Virtual ideology and the realization of collective principles. In S. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 36–54). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, L. (2007). Homework as serious family business: Power and subjectivity in negotiations about school assignments in Swedish families. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(2), 209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, M., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the internet: American Association for the Advancement of Science Workshop Report. Retrieved from https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/migrate/uploads/report2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• French, M., & Bazarova, N. (2017). Is anybody out there?: Understanding masspersonal communication through expectations for response across social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 303–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gatson, S. (2011). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research 4 (pp. 513–528). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, J., Dixit, J., & Green, D. (2002). Studying hate crime with the internet: What makes racists advocate racial violence? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgarten, J. (2000). Parents exist, ok!? London: IPPR.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K., Jones, E., Joshi, H., & Budge, D. (2010). Millennium cohort study fourth survey: A user’s guide to initial findings (2nd ed.). London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, C., Vogel, C., & Laurent, D. (2016). Internet research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2008). Internet research as emergent practice. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 535–542). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2013). The Internet. New York: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, J., & Bruckman, A. (2004). Go away: Participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. Information Society, 20(2), 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J., & Bruckman, A. (2005). Using empirical data to reason about internet research ethics. Paper presented at the ECSCW, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K. (2012). A labour of love: Mothers, emotional capital and homework. Gender and Education, 24(2), 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A., Lawson, C., & Ames, K. (2018). Are you really one of us? Exploring ethics, risk and insider research in a private Facebook community. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on social media and society, Copenhagen Denmark (SMSociety 18), 102–109.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (2015). ‘Intimate mothering publics’: Comparing face-to-face support groups and internet use for women seeking information and advice in the transition to first-time motherhood. Culture,Health & Sexuality, 17(2), 237–251.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. (1996). Researching internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society, 12(2), 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. (1998). On Netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. In J. Alba & J. Wesley Hutchinson (Eds.), NA advances in consumer research (Vol. 25, pp. 366–371). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using Netnography for marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. (2015). Netnography. In R. Mansell & P. Hwa Ang (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society (Vol. 2, pp. 654–660). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lehner-Mear, R. (under review). Good mother, bad mother?: Maternal identities and cyber-agency in the primary school homework debate.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I., Levy-Shiff, R., Appelbaum-Peled, T., Katz, I., Komar, M., & Meiran, N. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of maternal involvement in children’s homework: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madge, C., & O’Connor, H. (2006). Parenting gone wired: Empowerment of new mothers on the internet. Social and Cultural Geography, 7(2), 199–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2019). Primary homework in England: The beliefs and practices of teachers in primary schools. Education 3-13, 47(2), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morahan-Martin, J. (2000). Women and the internet: Promise and perils. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(5), 683–691.
   Google Scholar
• Munt, S., Bassett, E., & O’Riordan, K. (2002). Virtually belonging: Risk, connectivity, and coming out on-line. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 7(2/3), 125–137.
   Google Scholar
• Nonneke, B., Andrews, D., & Preece, J. (2006). Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behaviour. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. (2007). Mothers’ emotional care work in education and its moral imperative. Gender and Education, 19(2), 159–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, P., & Carr, C. (2017). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2018). School Inspection Handbook: Handbook for inspecting schools in England under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, S. (2000). On the matrix: Cyberfeminist simulations. In D. Bell & B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 325–336). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (2005). Mothers’ involvement in their children’s schooling: Social reproduction in action? In G. Crozier & D. Reay (Eds.), Activating participation: Parents and teachers working towards partnership (pp. 22–37). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ribbens-McCarthy, J., with Kirkpatrick, S. (2005). Negotiating public and private: Maternal mediations of home-school boundaries. In G. Crozier & D. Reay (Eds.), Activating participation: Parents and teachers working towards partnership (pp. 59–82). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, N. (2014). A review of homework literature as a precursor to practitioner-led doctoral research in a primary school. Research in Education, 91, 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Sharf, B. (1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the internet. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tackett-Gibson, M. (2008). Constructions of risk and harm in online discussions of ketamine use. Addiction Research & Theory, 16(3), 245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. (1999). Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urwin, C. (1985). Constructing motherhood: The persuasion of normal development. In C. Steedman, C. Urwin, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Language, gender and childhood (pp. 164–202). London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Valtchanov, B., Parry, D., Glover, T., & Mulcahy, C. (2014). Neighborhood at your fingertips: Transforming community online through a Canadian social networking site for mothers. Gender Technology and Development, 18(2), 187–217.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. (2002). Research ethics in internet enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 205–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warton, P. (1998). Mothers’ views about homework in the early years of school. The Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 23(1), 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (2015). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Diaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The social affordances of the internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(13).
   Google Scholar
• Winter, J. (2017). Parenting Identities, Practices and Social Support in Popular Parenting Websites: A narrative approach ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1553153/
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Yuan, R. (1998). Case studies of families doing third-grade homework. Teachers College Record, 100(2), 402–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar