2,150
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Cultivating citizen science for all: ethical considerations for research projects involving diverse and marginalized populations

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 497-508 | Received 17 May 2019, Accepted 10 Dec 2019, Published online: 17 Dec 2019

References

  • Blair, T., & Minkler, M. (2009). Participatory action research with older adults: Key principles in practice. The Gerontologist, 49(5), 651–662.
  • Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009a). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519688.pdf
  • Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009b). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984.
  • Bromley, E., Mikesell, L., Jones, F., & Khodyakov, D. (2015). From subject to participant: Ethics and the evolving role of community in health research. American Journal of Public Health, 105(5), 900–908.
  • Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099–1121.
  • Buman, M. P., Bertmann, F., Hekler, E. B., Winter, S. J., Sheats, J. L., King, A. C., & Wharton, C. M. (2015). A qualitative study of shopper experiences at an urban farmers’ market using the stanford healthy neighborhood discovery tool. Public Health Nutrition, 18(6), 994–1000.
  • Buman, M. P., Winter, S. J., Baker, C., Hekler, E. B., Otten, J. J., & King, A. C. (2011). Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Teams (NEAAT): Engaging older adults in policy activities to improve food and physical environments. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(2), 249–253.
  • Buman, M. P., Winter, S. J., Sheats, J. L., Hekler, E. B., Otten, J. J., Grieco, L. A., & King, A. C. (2013). The stanford healthy neighborhood discovery tool: A computerized tool to assess active living environments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44(4), e41–e47.
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2013). Guidelines for health research involving Aboriginal people (2007-2010). Retrieved from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29134.html
  • Chenhall, R., Senior, K., & Belton, S. (2011). Negotiating human research ethics: Case notes from anthropologists in the field. Anthropology Today, 27(5), 13–17.
  • Chesser, S., & Porter, M. (2019). Charting a future for Canada’s first Age-Friendly University (AFU). Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 40(2), 153–165.
  • Christopher, S., Watts, V., McCormick, A. K. H. G., & Young, S. (2008). Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1398–1406.
  • Clark, A., Holland, C., Katz, J., & Peace, S. (2009). Learning to see: Lessons from a participatory observation research project in public spaces. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 345–360.
  • Clarke, C. (2017). Be the change: Saving the world with citizen science. San Bernardino, CA: No publisher.
  • Cooper, C. (2016). Citizen science: How ordinary people are changing the face of discovery. New York, NY: The Overlook Press.
  • Dawson, E. (2018). Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups. Public Understanding of Science, 27(7), 772–786.
  • Den Broeder, L., Devilee, J., Van Oers, H., Schuit, A. J., & Wagemakers, A. (2016). Citizen science for public health. Health Promotion International, 33(3), 505–514.
  • Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., … Purcell, K. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291–297.
  • DiStefano, A., Quitugua, L., Hui, B., Barrera-Ng, A., Peters, R., Vunileva, I., … Tanjasiri, S. P. (2013). A community-based participatory research study of HIV and HPV vulnerabilities and prevention in two Pacific Islander communities: Ethical challenges and solutions. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(1), 68–78.
  • Eitzel, M. V., Cappadonna, J. L., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R. E., Virapongse, A., West, S. E., … Metcalfe, A. N. (2017). Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 1–20.
  • European Citizen Science Association. (2015). Ten principles of citizen science. Retrieved from https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/engage-us/10-principles-citizen-science
  • Evans, C., Abrams, E., Reitsma, R., Roux, K., Salmonsen, L., & Marra, P. P. (2005). The neighborhood nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen‐science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 589–594.
  • Flicker, S., & Worthington, C. A. (2012). Public health research involving Aboriginal peoples: Research ethics board stakeholders reflections on ethics principles and research processes. Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique, 103(1), 19–22.
  • Fogleman, T., & Curran, M. C. (2008). How accurate are student-collected data? The Science Teacher, 75(4), 30–35.
  • Genoe, M. R., & Dupuis, S. L. (2013). Picturing leisure: Using photovoice to understand the experience of leisure and dementia. The Qualitative Report, 18(11), 1–21.
  • Hannes, K., & Parylo, O. (2014). Let’s play it safe: Ethical considerations from participants in a photovoice research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 255–274.
  • Hemment, D., Ellis, R., & Wynne, B. (2011). Participatory mass observation and citizen science. Leonardo, 44(1), 62–63.
  • Hoover, E. (2016). “We’re not going to be guinea pigs;” Citizen science and environmental health in a Native American community. Journal of Science Communication, 15(1), 1–21.
  • Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Irwin, A. (2002). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
  • King, A. C. (2015). Theory’s role in shaping behavioral health research for population health. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 146–150.
  • King, A. C., Winter, S. J., Sheats, J. L., Rosas, L. G., Buman, M. P., Salvo, D., … Broderick, B. (2016). Leveraging citizen science and information technology for population physical activity promotion. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 1(4), 30–44.
  • Kung, H. (1993). Declaration toward a global ethic. Retrieved from https://parliamentofreligions.org/pwr_resources/_includes/FCKcontent/File/TowardsAGlobalEthic.pdf
  • League of European Research Universities. (2016). Citizen science at universities: Trends, guidelines, and recommendations. Retrieved from https://www.leru.org/files/Citizen-Science-at-Universities-Trends-Guidelines-and-Recommendations-Full-paper.pdf
  • Levine, R., González, R., & Martínez-Sussmann, C. (2009). Learner diversity in earth system science. Review of the NOAA Education Program: Commissioned Papers, Draft, 15,1–74.
  • Lundy, P., & McGovern, M. (2008). Whose justice? Rethinking transitional justice from the bottom up. Journal of Law and Society, 35(2), 265–292.
  • MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Mey, E., & van Hoven, B. (2019). Managing expectations in participatopry research involving older people: What’s in it for whom? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(3), 323–334.
  • Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.
  • Minkler, M. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health, 82(2), ii3–ii12.
  • Mueller, M. P., Tippins, D., & Bryan, L. A. (2012). The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20(1). Retrieved from https://democracyeducationjournal.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=home
  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Government. (2006). Keeping research on track: A guide for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples about health research ethics. Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e65/
  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Government. (2015). National statement on ethical conduct in human research (2007). Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72
  • Pain, R., & Francis, P. (2003). Reflections on participatory research. Area, 35(1), 46–54.
  • Pandya, R. E. (2012). A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 314–317.
  • Ramirez-Andreotta, M. D., Brusseau, M. L., Artiola, J., Maier, R. M., & Gandolfi, A. J. (2015). Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a Superfund site: The Gardenroots case study. International Public Health Journal, 7(1), 1–19. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420190/pdf/nihms633688.pdf
  • Resnik, D. B. (2019). Citizen scientists as human subjects: Ethical issues. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1). Retrieved from https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/10.5334/cstp.150/
  • Resnik, D. B., Elliott, K. C., & Miller, A. K. (2015). A framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen science. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 475–481.
  • Riesch, H. (2015). Citizen science. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 631–636). New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Riesch, H., & Potter, C. (2014). Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 107–120.
  • Rowbotham, S., McKinnon, M., Leach, J., Lamberts, R., & Hawe, P. (2019). Does citizen science have the capacity to transform population health science? Critical Public Health, 29(1), 118–128.
  • Schäfer, T., & Kieslinger, B. (2016). Supporting emerging forms of citizen science: A plea for diversity, creativity and social innovation. Journal of Science Communication, 15(2), 1–12.
  • Sheats, J. L., Winter, S. J., Padilla-Romero, P., Goldman-Rosas, L., Grieco, L. A., & King, A. C. (2013, November). Comparison of passive versus active photo capture of built environment features by technology naïve Latinos using the SenseCam and Stanford healthy neighborhood discovery tool. In Proceedings of the 4th International SenseCam & Pervasive Imaging Conference (pp. 8–15). San Diego, CA: Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library.
  • Standards for citizen science. (2015). Principles and guidelines for citizen science projects at universities and other research institutions. Retrieved from https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/biol/imsb/imsb-dam/events/citizenscience_data/additional_content/standards_for_citizen_science.doc
  • Stevens, M., Vitos, M., Altenbuchner, J., Conquest, G., Lewis, J., & Haklay, M. (2014). Taking participatory citizen science to extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 13(2), 20–29.
  • Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., Bascom, D., & Cabral, A. (2000). Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen‐science project. Science Education, 84(2), 265–275.
  • Tuckett, A. G. (1998). An ethic of the fitting: A conceptual framework for nursing practice. Nursing Inquiry, 5(4), 220–227.
  • Tuckett, A. G., Banchoff, A. W., Winter, S. J., & King, A. C. (2018). The built environment and older adults: A literature review and an applied approach to engaging older adults in built environment improvements for health. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 13(1), 1–9.
  • Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). [online] Kauai, HI: IEEE. Retrieved from http://andreawiggins.com/research/Wiggins2011HICSS.pdf
  • Wiggins, A., & Wilbanks, J. (2019). The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), 3–14.
  • Wilson, E., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2018a). Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 189–199.
  • Wilson, E., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2018b). Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research: Exploring researchers’ experiences. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(1), 7–24.
  • Winter, S. J., Buman, M. P., Sheats, J. L., Hekler, E. B., Otten, J. J., Baker, C., … King, A. C. (2014). Harnessing the potential of older adults to measure and modify their environments: Long-term successes of the Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Team (NEAAT) study. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4(2), 226–227.
  • Winter, S. J., Rosas, L. G., Romero, P. P., Sheats, J. L., Buman, M. P., Baker, C., & King, A. C. (2016). Using citizen scientists to gather, analyze, and disseminate information about neighborhood features that affect active living. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 18(5), 1126–1138.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.