References
- Atack, I. (2006). Nonviolent political action and the limits of consent. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 53(111), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.3167/004058106780446449
- Beauchamp, T. L. (2007). The ‘four principles’ approach to health care ethics. In A. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper, & J. R. McMillan (Eds.), Principles of health care ethics (2nd ed., pp. 3–10). John Wiley & Sons.
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
- Bell, K. (2014). Resisting commensurability: Against informed consent as an anthropological virtue. American Anthropologist, 116(3), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12122
- Bengry-Howell, A., & Griffin, C. (2012). Negotiating access in ethnographic research with ‘hard to reach’ young people: Establishing common ground or a process of methodological grooming? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(5), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.600115
- Beres, M. A. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514539652
- Browne, B. C., & McBride, R.-S. (2015). Politically sensitive encounters: Ethnography, access, and the benefits of “hanging out”. Qualitative Sociology Review, 11(1), 34–48. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/archive_eng.php
- Brunger, F., & Russell, T. (2015). Risk and representation in research Ethics: The NunatuKavut experience. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(4), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615599687
- Bull, J. R. (2010). Research with Aboriginal peoples: Authentic relationships as a precursor to ethical research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(4), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.13
- Butz, D. (2008). Sidelined by the guidelines: Reflections on the limitations of standard informed consent procedures for the conduct of ethical research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 7(2), 239–259.
- Caringella, S. (2009). Addressing rape reform in law and practice. Columbia University Press.
- Choudry, A. (2015). Learning activism: The intellectual life of contemporary social movements. University of Toronto Press.
- Coram, S. (2011). Rethinking indigenous research approval-the perspective of a ‘stranger’. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102038
- Cox, L. (2014). Movements making knowledge: A new wave of inspiration for sociology? Sociology, 48(5), 954–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514539063
- Crow, G., Wiles, R., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2006). Research ethics and data quality: The implications of informed consent. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595231
- D’Arcangelis, C. L. (2018). Revelations of a white settler woman scholar-activist: The fraught promise of self-reflexivity. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, 18(5), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708617750675
- Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
- England, K. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x
- Foster, S. S., & Glass, R. D. (2017). Ethical, epistemic, and political issues in equity-oriented collaborative community-based research. In L. L. Rowell, C. D. Bruce, J. M. Shosh, & M. M. Riel (Eds.), The Palgrave International handbook of action research (pp. 511–525). Palgrave Macmillan US.
- Glass, K. C., & Kaufert, J. (2007). Research ethics review and aboriginal community values: Can the two be reconciled? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2007.2.2.25
- Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
- Guillemin, M., Gillam, L., Rosenthal, D., & Bolitho, A. (2012). Human research ethics committees: Examining their roles and practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.38
- Hammersley, M. (2015). On ethical principles for social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.924169
- Hoff, S. (2015). Locke and the nature of political authority. The Review of Politics, 77(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670514000813
- Hudson, M. (2009). Think globally, act locally: Collective consent and the ethics of knowledge production. International Social Science Journal, 60(195), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.01706.x
- Khanlou, N., & Peter, E. (2005). Participatory action research: Considerations for ethical review. Social Science & Medicine, 60(10), 2333–2340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.004
- Kidman, J. (2007). Engaging with Māori communities: An exploration of some tensions in the mediation of social sciences research. Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga.
- Kirsch, G. E. (2005). Friendship, friendliness, and feminist fieldwork. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4), 2163–2172. https://doi.org/10.1086/428415
- Lahman, M. K., Geist, M. R., Rodriguez, K. L., Graglia, P., & Deroche, K. K. (2011). Culturally responsive relational reflexive ethics in research: The three rs. Quality & Quantity, 45(6), 1397–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9347-3
- Lester, J., & Anders, A. D. (2018). Engaging ethics in postcritical ethnography: Troubling transparency, trustworthiness, and advocacy. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3060
- Lewis, S. J., & Russell, A. J. (2011). Being embedded: A way forward for ethnographic research. Ethnography, 12(3), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138110393786
- Lie, R., & Witteveen, L. (2017). Visual informed consent: Informed consent without forms. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1116835
- Locke, J., & Macpherson, C. B. (1980). Second treatise of government. Hackett Publishing Company.
- Majic, S., & Showden, C. R. (2019). Redesigning the study of sex work: A case for intersectionality and reflexivity. In S. Dewey, C. Izugbara, & I. Crowhurst (Eds.), Handbook of sex industry research (pp. 42–54). Routledge.
- Morrow, V., & Richards, M. (1996). The ethics of social research with children: An overview. Children & Society, 10(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.1996.tb00461.x
- Nairn, K., Higgins, J., & Sligo, J. (2012). Children of Rogernomics: A neoliberal generation leaves school. Otago University Press.
- O’Malley, V. (2019). The New Zealand wars = Ngā Pakanga o Aotearoa. Bridget Williams Books.
- Pachirat, T. (2017). Among wolves: Ethnography and the immersive study of power. Routledge.
- Pillow, W. S., & Mayo, C. (2014). Feminist ethnography: Histories, challenges, and possibilities. In S. Hesse-Bieber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. (pp. 187–205) SAGE.
- Plankey-Videla, N. (2012). Informed consent as process: Problematizing informed consent in organizational ethnographies. Qualitative Sociology, 35(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9212-2
- Plows, A. (2008). Social movements and ethnographic methodologies: An analysis using case study examples. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1523–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00091.x
- Reardon, J. (2001). The human genome diversity project: A case study in coproduction. Social Studies of Science, 31(3), 357–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031003002
- Roth, W.-M., & von Unger, H. (2018). Current perspectives on research ethics in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3155
- Rousseau, J.-J. (2012). Rousseau: The basic political writings: Discourse on the sciences and the arts, discourse on the origin of inequality, discourse on political economy, on the social contract, the state of war ( D. A. Cress, Trans; D. Wootton Ed, 2nd ed.). Hackett Publishing Company.
- Routledge, P. (2003). River of resistance: Critical collaboration and the dilemmas of power and ethics. Ethics, Place and Environment, 6(1), 66–73.
- Schrag, B. (2006). Research with groups: Group rights, group consent, and collaborative research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0049-0
- Swan, D. J., & Collins, M. A. (2008). Sign on the dotted line: The informed consent process (ICP) as induced compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(11), 2637–2647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00407.x
- Thomas-Hughes, H. (2018). Ethical ‘mess’ in co-produced research: Reflections from a U.K.-based case study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1364065
- Tolich, M., & Fitzgerald, M. H. (2006). If ethics committees were designed for ethnography. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2006.1.2.71
- Van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2011). Procedural routines: The application form and the consent form. In W. C. Van den Hoonaard (Ed.), The seduction of ethics: Transforming the social sciences (pp. 122–143). University of Toronto Press.
- Viruru, R., & Cannella, G. S. (2006). A postcolonial critique of the ethnographic interview. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge (pp. 175–191). Left Coast Press.
- West-McGruer, K. (2020). There’s ‘consent’ and then there’s consent: Mobilizing Māori and Indigenous research ethics to problematize the western biomedical model. Journal of Sociology. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783319893523
- Wood, B., & Kidman, J. (2013). Negotiating ethical challenges in youth research. In K. te Riele & R. Brooks (Eds.), Negotiating the ethical borders of visual research with young people (pp. 149–162). Routledge.