References
- Apramian, T., Cristancho, S., Watling, C., & Lingard, L. (2017). (Re)grounding grounded theory: A close reading of theory in four schools. Qualitative Research, 17(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116672914
- Bearman, M., & Dawson, P. (2013). Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education. Medical Education, 47(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12092
- Belgrave, L. L., & Seide, K. (2019). Coding for grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 167–185). Sage.
- Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Bowers, A. W., & Creamer, E. G. (2020). A grounded theory systematic review of environmental education for secondary students in the United States. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 1–18. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1770446.
- Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Introduction: Grounded theory research: Methods and practices. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 1–28). Sage.
- Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research practice. Oxford University Press.
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Charmaz, K. (2017). Continuities, contradictions, and critical inquiry in grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691771935. Article 160940691771935. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917719350
- Conn, V. S., Isaramalai, S., Rath, S., Jantarakupt, P., Wadhawan, R., & Dash, Y. (2003). Beyond MEDLINE for literature searches. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00177.x
- Cooper, H. M. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by step approach (4th ed.). Sage.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
- Covan, E. K. (2007). The discovery of grounded theory in practice: The legacy of multiple mentors. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 58–74). Sage.
- Creamer, E. G. (2018). Enlarging the conceptualization of mixed method approaches to grounded theory with intervention research. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 919–934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772642
- Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
- Dey, I. (2007). Grounding categories. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 167–190). Sage.
- Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135581960501000110
- Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(5), 654–663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01897.x
- Finfgeld, D. L. (1999). Courage as a process of pushing beyond the struggle. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 803–814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122298
- Finlayson, K., & Dixon, A. (2008). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A guide for the novice. Nurse Researcher, 15(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2008.01.15.2.59.c6330
- Friese, S. (2019). Grounded theory analysis and CAQDAS: A happy pairing or remodeling GT to QDA? In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 282–312). Sage.
- Glaser, B. G. (2007). Doing formal theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 97–113). Sage.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2006). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. (Original work published 1967).
- Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
- Guetterman, T. C., Babchuk, W. A., Howell Smith, M. C., & Stevens, J. (2017). Contemporary approaches to mixed methods–grounded theory research: A field-based analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817710877
- Heyvaert, M., Hannes, K., & Onghena, P. (2017). Using mixed methods research synthesis for literature reviews. Sage.
- Higgins, J., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. (Version 5.1.0). Cochrane Institute. http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/
- Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–289). Sage.
- Hood, J. C. (2007). Orthodoxy vs. power: The defining traits of grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 151–164). Sage.
- Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600407
- Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (Fifth ed.). International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf
- Kastner, M., Tricco, A. C., Soobiah, C., Lillie, E., Perrier, L., Horsley, T., Welch, V., Cogo, E., Antony, J., & Straus, S. E. (2012). What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), Article 114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-114
- Kearney, M. H. (2001). Enduring love: A grounded formal theory of women’s experience of domestic violence. Research in Nursing & Health, 24(4), 270–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.1029
- Kearney, M. H. (2007). From the sublime to the meticulous: The continuing evolution of grounded formal theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 127–150). Sage.
- Kelle, U. (2007). The development of categories: Different approaches in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 191–213). Sage.
- Kelle, U. (2019). The status of theories and models in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 68–88). Sage.
- Lau, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Schmid, C. H. (1997). Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(9), 820–826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008
- Lempert, L. B. (2007). Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 245–264). Sage.
- McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity: The literature review in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 334–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04436.x
- Morse, J. M., & Clark, L. (2019). The nuances of grounded theory sampling and the pivotal role of theoretical sampling. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 145–166). Sage.
- Nelson, J. (2017). Using conceptual depth criteria: Addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 17(5), 554–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116679873
- Noblit, G. W., Hare, R. D., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage.
- Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
- Ralph, N., Birks, M., & Chapman, Y. (2015). The methodological dynamism of grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915611576
- Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E
- Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., Stern, P. N., & Morse, J. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 311–326). Sage.
- Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349(jan02 1), g7647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
- Stern, P. N. (2007). On solid ground: Essential properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 114–126). Sage.
- Thornberg, R., & Dunne, C. (2019). Literature review in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 206–221). Sage.
- Timonen, V., Foley, G., & Conlon, C. (2018). Challenges when using grounded theory: A pragmatic introduction to doing GT research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918758086
- Urquhart, C. (2019). Grounded theory’s best kept secret: The ability to build theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 89–106). Sage.
- Whittemore, R. (2005). Analysis of integration in nursing science and practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(3), 261–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00045.x
- Whittemore, R., Chao, A., Jang, M., & Minges, K. E. (2014). Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview. Heart & Lung, 43(5), 453–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014
- Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51