References
- Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press.
- Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press.
- Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Humanities Press.
- Bhaskar, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Verso.
- Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. Verso.
- Braumoeller, B. F., & Goertz, G. (2000). The methodology of necessary conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 844–858. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2669285
- Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. Verso.
- Elder-Vass, D. (2010). The causal powers of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge University Press.
- Falleti, T. G., & Mahoney, J. (2015). The comparative sequential method. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis (pp. 211–239). Cambridge University Press.
- Fletcher, A. J. (2017). Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401
- Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
- Gerring, J. (2010). Causal mechanisms: Yes, But …. Comparative Political Studies, 43(11), 1499–1526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010376911
- Goertz, G. (2006). Assessing the trivialness, relevance, and relative importance of necessary or sufficient conditions in social science. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41(2), 88–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686312
- Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton University Press.
- Gorski, P. (2009). Social “Mechanisms” and comparative-historical sociology: A critical realist proposal. In P. Hedström & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Frontiers of sociology (pp. 147–196). Brill.
- Hacking, I. (2002). Historical Ontology. Harvard University Press.
- Hall, P. (2003). Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative politics. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 373–406). Cambridge University Press.
- Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press.
- Hug, S. (2013). Qualitative comparative analysis: How inductive use and measurement error lead to problematic inference. Political Analysis, 21(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps061
- Joseph, J., & Wight, C. (Eds.). (2010). Scientific realism and international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
- King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
- Kittel, B. (2005). The American political methodology debate: Where is the battlefield? Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.998192
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
- Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press.
- Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. Routledge.
- Lucas, S. R., & Szatrowski, A. (2014). Qualitative comparative analysis in critical perspective. Sociological Methodology, 44(1), 1–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175014532763
- Luke, T. W. (2013). Stultifying politics today: The ‘natural science’ model in american political science—how is it natural, science, and a model? New Political Science, 35(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2013.813686
- Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(4), 245–265. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009173
- Mahoney, J. (2004). Comparative-historical methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110507
- Mahoney, J. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570–597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112437709
- Mahoney, J., Kimball, E., & Koivu, K. L. (2009). The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences. Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 114–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325433
- Paine, J. (2016). Set-theoretic comparative methods: Less distinctive than claimed. Comparative Political Studies, 49(6), 703–741. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014564851
- Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
- Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson and Co.
- Porpora, D. V. (2015). Reconstructing sociology: The critical realist approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy set social science. University of Chicago Press.
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
- Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
- Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). Can one or a few cases yield theoretical gains? In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 305–336). Cambridge University Press.
- Sayer, A. R. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. Routledge.
- Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
- Schutz, A. (1970). Selective attention: Relevances and typification. In A. Schutz (Ed.), On phenomenology and social relations (pp. 111–124). University of Chicago Press.
- Seawright, J. (2002). Testing for necessary and/or sufficient causation: Which cases are relevant? Political Analysis, 10(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.2.178
- Seawright, J. (2018). Why cross-case qualitative causal inference is weak, and why we should still compare. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 16(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2562153
- Sewell, W. H., Jr. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. University of Chicago Press.
- Skocpol, T., & Somers, M. (1980). The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosociological Inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 174–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500009282
- Steinmetz, G. (1998). Critical realism and historical sociology. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40(1), 170–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417598980069
- Steinmetz, G. (2004). Odious comparisons: Incommensurability, the case study, and ‘Small N’s’ in sociology. Sociological Theory, 22(3), 371–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00225.x
- Suganami, H. (2013). Causation-in-the-world: A contribution to meta-theory of IR. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 623–643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813484185
- Tilly, C. (2001). Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.21
- Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge University Press.
- Waldner, D. (2005). It ain’t necessarily so–or is it? Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.998200
- Waldner, D. (2007). Transforming inferences into explanations: Lessons from the study of mass extinctions. In R. N. Lebow & M. I. Lichbach (Eds.), Theory and evidence in comparative politics and international relations (pp. 145-176). Palgrave Macmillan.