Difficult data: reflections on making knowledge claims in a turmoil of competing subjectivities, sensibilities and sensitivities

References

• Bondi, L. (2014). Understanding feelings: Engaging with unconscious communication and embodied knowledge. Emotion, Space and Society, 2014,10, 44–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2013.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, A., & Robson, M. (2015). Participants’ reflections on being interviewed about risk and sexual behaviour: Implications for collection of qualitative data on sensitive topics. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(1), 1056–1116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.860747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (2001). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of colour. Sanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2010). The qualitative mandate. Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2008). The reflexive journey: Mapping multiple routes. In L. Finlay & B. Gough (Eds.), Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences (pp. 3–20). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (eds). (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (1998). Dialogues and differences: Writing, reflexivity and the crisis of representation. In Henwood, K., Griffin, C. & Phoenix, A. (Eds.), Standpoints and differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology (pp. 18–44). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V., & Alldred, P. (2012). The ethics of intention: Research as a political tool. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 43–60). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (ed). (1987). Feminism and methodology. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (2004). A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory’s controversiality. Hypatia, 19(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01267.x
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s ‘truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited’: Truth or justice?’. Signs, 22(21), 367–374. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/495161
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. (2004). The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historial materialism. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 35–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K., Griffin, C., & Phoenix, A. (eds). (1998). Standpoints and Differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, & Leavy. (2007). Feminist research practice: A primer. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggart, L. (2012). “I’m pregnant … what am I going to do?” An examination of value judgements and moral frameworks in teenage pregnancy decision making. Health, Risk & Society, 14(6), 533–549. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2012.706263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggart, L. (2018). Moral dilemmas and abortion decision-making: Lessons learnt from abortion research in England and Wales. Global Pubic Health. 14(1), 1–8.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2018.1474482
   Google Scholar
• Hoggart, Lesley; Phillips, Joan; Birch, Angela and Koffman, Ofra (2010). Young people in London: abortion and repeat abortion. Government Office For London, London.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, B. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender and cultural politics. South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Intemann, K. (2010). 25 years of feminist empiricism and standpoint theory: Where are we now? Hypatia, 25(4), 778–795. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (1998). Telling stories: Memory, narrative and experience in feminist research and theory. In Henwood, K., Griffin, C. & Phoenix, A. (Eds.), Standpoints and differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology (pp. 45–64). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., & Rowlands, T. (2012). The interpersonal dynamics of in-depth interviewing. InGubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A., Marvasti, A. B., & McKinney, K. D.(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research. (pp. 99–114). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, J., & Feldman, E. (2019). Class matters: Interviewing across social class boundaries. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1535879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M., & Jessop, J. (eds). (2012). Ethics in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choice. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T. (2004). ‘Interviews’. In C. Seale, G. Giampietro, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 15–33). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ribbens, J., & Edwards, R. (1998). Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, H. (ed). (1981). Doing feminist research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Dorans, E. (2018). Reflexivity and ethical research practice while interviewing on sexual topics. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 747–760. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1490980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolls, L. and Relf, M. (2006) Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in palliative care and bereavement. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, S. (2008). The decision to opt for abortion. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 34(3), 175–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1783/147118908784734765
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan-flood, R., & Gill, R. (2010). Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflection. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seu, I. B. (1998). Shameful women: Accounts of withdrawal and silence. In Henwood, K., Griffin, C. & Phoenix, A. (Eds.), Standpoints and differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology (pp. 135–155). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, C. (1998). Women and Men talk about aggression: An analysis of narrative genre. In Henwood, K., Griffin, C. & Phoenix, A. (Eds.), Standpoints and Differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology (pp. 65–90). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist epistemology and ontology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willot, S. (1998). An outsider within: A feminist doing research with men. In Henwood, K., Griffin, C. & Phoenix, A. (Eds.), Standpoints and differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology (pp. 174–190). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar