References
- Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1992). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.
- Beitin, B. K. (2012). Interview and sampling. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 243–254). Sage.
- Bourque, C. J., & Bourdon, S. (2017). Multidisciplinary graduate training in social research methodology and computer-assisted qualitative data analysis: A hands-on/hands-off course design. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(4), 475–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1135882
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
- Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2020). Elicited metaphor analysis: Researching teaching and learning. In M. R. M. Ward & S. Delamont (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 488–505). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Davidson, J., Paulus, T., & Jackson, K. (2016). Speculating on the future of digital tools for qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(7), 606–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415622505
- Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
- Dowling, R., & Wilson, M. (2017). Digital doctorates? An exploratory study of PhD candidates’ use of online tools. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1058720
- Este, D., Sieppert, J., & Barsky, A. (1998). Teaching and learning qualitative research with and without qualitative data analysis software. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 138–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1998.10782247
- Friese, S. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS. ti. SAGE Publications Limited.
- Gibbs, G. R. (2014). Count: Developing STEM skills in qualitative research methods teaching and learning. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/count-developing-stem-skills-qualitative-research-methods-teaching-and-learning
- Gilbert, L. S. (2002). Going the distance: “Closeness” in qualitative data analysis software. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210146276
- Gilbert, L. S., Jackson, K., & Di Gregorio, S. (2014). Tools for analyzing qualitative data: The history and relevance of qualitative data analysis software. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, & M. J. Bishop, (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 221–236). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5
- Gouseti, A. (2017). Exploring doctoral students’ use of digital technologies: What do they use them for and why? Educational Review, 69(5), 638–654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1291492
- Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with Nvivo. SAGE Publications Limited.
- Leitch, J., Oktay, J., & Meehan, B. (2016). A dual instructional model for computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software integrating faculty member and specialized instructor: Implementation, reflections, and recommendations. Qualitative Social Work, 15(3), 392–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015618773
- Mangabeira, W. C., Lee, R. M., & Fielding, N. G. (2004). Computers and qualitative research: Adoption, use, and representation. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303262622
- Marshall, H. (2002). What do we do when we code data. Qualitative Research Journal, 2(1), 56–70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285842091_What_do_we_do_when_we_code_data
- Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Sage.
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
- Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
- Paulus, T., & Bennett, A. M. (2017). ‘I have a love–hate relationship with ATLAS.ti’TM: Integrating qualitative data analysis software into a graduate research methods course. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 40(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1056137
- Paulus, T., Pope, E. M., Woolf, N., & Silver, C. (2019). It will be very helpful once I understand ATLAS.ti: Teaching ATLAS.ti using the five-level QDA method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1510662
- Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
- Salmona, M., & Kaczynski, D. (2016). Don’t blame the software: Using qualitative data analysis software successfully in doctoral research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2505
- Silver, C. (2018). CAQDAS at a Crossroads: Choices, Controversies and Challenges. In A. Costa, L. Reis, F. Souza, & A. Moreira (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research. ISQR 2017, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, (Vol. 621, pp. 1–13). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_1
- Silver, C., & Lewins, A. (2014). Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-step Guide. Sage.
- Silver, C., & Rivers, C. (2016). The CAQDAS postgraduate learning model: An interplay between methodological awareness, analytic adeptness and technological proficiency. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(5), 593–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1061816
- Wan, W., & Low, G. (2015). Introduction. In W. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse (pp. 1–14). John Benjamins.
- Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2016). Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (QDAS)? Reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using ATLAS. ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 597–617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315596311
- Woolf, N., & Silver, C. (2018). Qualitative analysis using ATLAS.ti: The five-level QDA method. Routledge.
- Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.